Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

The 4% Principle

July 13, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

An unexpected e-mail arrives. The newish dean has been relieved of his duties. Failed administrative tenures are too common. What tends to go wrong and what can administrators do to avoid flaming out?

No two flameouts are identical, but there are identifiable patterns and themes. More often than not, failed administrators are smart enough, and hard working enough, but don’t have the requisite interpersonal skills. In short, absent positive traditions and mechanisms that help foster mutual respect among faculty members, interpersonal conflicts increase in number and intensity until a tipping point is reached where faculty morale spirals downward and program quality is compromised to the point that a change in leadership is the only way forward.

Another way of approaching the problem is to ask, what do the best administrators get right? What distinguishes their leadership? Surely many things, but to highlight one, the most effective administrators create positive traditions and put in place mechanisms that foster mutual respect among those they lead.

My university’s president models this especially well. For example, last December, despite serious economic challenges, we had our traditional winter luncheon. Everyone enjoyed excellent food, exceptional music, and friendly conversation. Also, as always, every employee who had worked for five or more years (in five year increments) was recognized and received a gift certificate to the bookstore.

A cynic might argue that the luncheon celebration contributed to a reduced faculty salary pool, but that would miss the point altogether. It’s a relationship-building tradition that defies simple cost-benefit analysis. My president knows that the quality of our relationships will determine how well we collaborate on interdisciplinary programs, how thoughtfully we update general university requirements, and how effectively we set priorities in light of severe budget restrictions.

Some of the president’s community-building activities are subtler and less visible, like the personal notes he writes to people who get promoted or garner recognition for their teaching, service, or scholarship. He also takes care to distribute personal tributes about deceased members of the community, mostly emeritus professors. So far I haven’t known the former faculty members, but as I read the tributes and learn about their backgrounds and contributions, I get the sense that I’m part of an institution that’s much larger than myself, an institution that has a positive legacy in the Pacific Northwest.

Last year I was a Fulbright visiting lecturer at Hedmark University College, in Hamar, Norway. Like every faculty group, Hedmark faculty had to negotiate political, philosophical, and curricular differences. Monthly, they called “time out” from the hard work of resolving differences and enjoyed a simple, but beautiful lunch complete with cloth tablecloths, candles, desserts, cheese and crackers. Wine bottles were raffled off, a flutist and violinist played a few exquisite pieces, a couple of funny stories were told and people lingered before returning to their offices.

I’m a new lower case “a” administrator, hopefully improving as I go, coordinating a small master’s teacher certification program. My lesson learned from recent events is that the best administrators are intentional about building relationships and fostering mutual respect. They don’t assume people will naturally get along; instead, they create traditions and put in place mechanisms that foster dialogue, help people better understand one another, and build a reservoir of mutual respect.

I’m labeling this the “4 percent principle.” I wonder if things would have turned out differently for our former dean if he had set aside 2 of every 50 hours to think about new traditions, to write personal notes, and to think creatively about how to foster mutual respect? More personally, will I develop “4 percent principle” discipline?

Many administrators would probably argue they can’t afford to take even an hour to write personal notes and “think creatively about how to foster mutual respect.” Recent experience tells me I can’t afford not to.

Ronald S. Byrnes is associate professor of education and movement studies at Pacific Lutheran University

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The 4% Principle

  • Administrators
  • Posted by Jeff Senese , VPAA at Johnson and Wales University on July 13, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • I have a few comments to Bynes. First, the assumption that administrators are ineffective interpersonally is not supported by the reality that most rise because of these skills. Second, many higher level administrators are "asked" to step down for political reasons (e.g., a new president or provost, tec.) rather than due to performance issues. The fact of the matter is, and I have been an administrator since 1997, that one can do all the right things and still be removed. That written, I agree with your basic premise that being genuine and personal is a key to longevity. In my case I have written cards since day one and I also routinely have lunch or dinner or breakfast with individuals and groups to just talk to people. The other thing that is very important is to walk through the labs and facilities from time to time (even once a semester) to see and be seen.

  • Jeff Senese
  • Posted by DFS on July 13, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Whoa. The administrators are adept interpersonally, but only among administrators and administrator wannabees..

    Else, they would be satisfied, and therefore truly altruistically motivated, to be adept with their students, whom they obviously don't value as much as their own pocketbooks or the subsequently acquired power over their former peers.

    Such is the mind-set of bureaucrats, and the exception, we must remember, is rare.

  • Honoring Relationships
  • Posted by Steve Wright , Pastor at Village Pres on July 16, 2009 at 3:15pm EDT
  • The 4% Principal can be applied to a variety of institutions. Byrnes says it well. While it is true "one can do all the right things and still be removed," the focus here is on the necessity of fostering mutually supportive relationships. Taking the time to write a personal tribute honoring a deceased emeritus professor demonstrates the value of every team member. Doesn't everyone want to belong to that kind of institution? I know I do.

  • very good advice.....
  • Posted by Patrick Sanaghan , partner at The Sanaghan Group on July 18, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Mr Byrnes provides any higher education leader with wise advice on building "relational capital", which is essential to a leader's success. One of a leaders primary responsibilities is building a sense of community and connection on their campus. This is not easy to do. It takes time, attention , discipline and authenticity. Many of his suggestions are helpful.

    Relationships matter in higher education more than most organizations, because of the unique nature of shared governance on campuses, and the need for cross boundary collaboration across campus to get things done. In my experience, effective leaders are not only smart, they have good relational skills. This doesn't mean lots of charm and charisma, which can be a liability on many campuses.

    It does mean they are respectful, they listen well (a rare trait by the way) acknowledge others accomplishments, pay attention to meaningful traditions and treat people with care. It is the difference between "smartship " and real leadership. Thanks for the ideas, keep them coming.