Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

More Than Appearances

October 22, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

This past week, Morehouse College, a historically black, all-male college, instituted a dress code, which details what students should wear to various college functions and activities and what they should not. The items that are not allowed include: caps, do-rags, and hoods in the classrooms, cafeteria and indoors; sun glasses and grillz; clothing with lewd comments; sagging pants and pajamas in public; and women’s clothing and accessories.

Morehouse students have had mixed reactions to the new policies. Some students feel that these rules hinder their freedom of speech and expression – as adults, they should be able to wear what they want when they want. Other students think the policy is long overdue. When you are admitted to Morehouse, they feel, you become a Morehouse man and follow in a long tradition of great African American men such as civil rights leaders Martin Luther King Jr. and Julian Bond or national health leaders Louis W. Sullivan and David Satcher. This kind of legacy requires dressing and carrying oneself in a professional way.

Last year, my colleague Shaun Harper and I wrote an article published in the Journal of Negro Education entitled “The Consequences of Conservatism at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” Ironically, much of the article focused on campus dress codes at black colleges. As part of our research, we reviewed the dress codes at all of the black colleges in the United States. We found similar dress codes to the one instituted at Morehouse and we called these codes into question as scholars typically do. We wondered what kind of impact conservative dress codes would have on the individual autonomy of students and argued that these often puritanical codes are part of a long history of black colleges compensating for negative views by white society of black people.

However, as I think about the new Morehouse dress code, I am reminded that much of America (read: white America) does not see African Americans as individuals. If a young white male dresses in pajamas or saggy pants, and a lewd t-shirt on a predominantly white campus, he is seen neither as a representative of his race nor his campus. And let’s be honest, anyone who visits campuses these days, including some of the most prestigious in the country, will see many white male students displaying more of their underwear than most of us want to see, wearing caps inside, and displaying crude T-shirts. But when a young black male wears saggy pants, pajamas, or a do-rag, many Americans see him as a representative of all black America (and in this case, Morehouse College). The stakes are higher for black men because of American racism. The stakes are higher for Morehouse College as well.

There are those who argue that when one gains admission to a college, one signs up for the rules of that college – to be a Morehouse man in this case. There are others who claim that more learning takes place when we take decisions about clothing and fashion out of students’ hands. For me, the most convincing argument is made by those who want to change the nation’s perceptions of young black men and it seems that Morehouse College is making this argument. The institution’s president wants the students to dress like professional men because he wants them to become professional men.

When I first saw the dress code, I immediately forwarded it to a good friend who graduated from Morehouse about 20 years ago. He was happy to see the code and responded that with regard to Morehouse, “Many are called but few are chosen” – reminding me that Morehouse was a standard setter, not a trend follower.

Yet, it does seem like there could be a middle ground. Perhaps when attending school functions and classes, these young men could be expected to dress professionally but in their personal time, they could be free to express their individuality – seems like that is what most adults do once they are in the “real world.” But then again, the stakes are higher for the young, black men at Morehouse, aren’t they?

One of the most controversial aspects of the dress code is the banning of women’s clothing and garb. Even though the Morehouse administration consulted the college’s gay students group and the majority of these students voted in favor of the rules, including the ban on women’s garb, this rule may give some pause. I am not an expert on this topic, but I do wonder what will happen if a Morehouse man wants to become a Morehouse woman? What happens to the transgender Morehouse man? Does he go to another college or stay at Morehouse? I don’t have the answer, but I think the Morehouse dress code raises some important questions about race, sexuality, and masculinity that we in higher education should tackle head on and hesitate to avoid. As my friend said, Morehouse College is a standard setter and has the opportunity to be out in front on discussing these issues.

By raising issues about cross-dressing and dress and appearance generally, Morehouse is forcing discussions and more thought about the way society views black men. And Morehouse is making sure that its black men – who already defy stereotypes with their ambition and intelligence – will do so with their attire as well.

Marybeth Gasman is associate professor of education at the University of Pennsylvania. A historian of higher education, her books include Envisioning Black Colleges: A History of the United Negro College Fund(Johns Hopkins University Press). She is also the co-editor of Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Triumphs, Troubles, and Taboos (Palgrave).

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on More Than Appearances

  • Morehouse Dress Code
  • Posted by Louis Gallien , Distinguished Professor at Regent University on October 22, 2009 at 7:30am EDT
  • Professor Gasman does a good job in problematizing the initiation of a dress code at Morehouse.

    If we contextualize this further to the special traditions and ethos of women's college and evangelical Christian colleges, we find that their traditions are equally questioned and when they make decisions based on the exclusive nature of their institutions, the same reaction that people read from the Morehouse decision repeats itself.

    The real dilemma for all three types of institutions is their survival in this Century: women's colleges are down to 54, HBCU's and evangelical institutions hover just over the 100 mark. Plagued by low endowments, poor demographics (only two percent of all evangelical and women's colelge alumni send their children to such colleges), rural environments, the distinctive nature of these institutions look increasing anachronistic. If so, they probably will not survive into the next Century. The issue is: Are they important enough to matter?

  • Showing some class?
  • Posted by Andrea Campbell , Associate Prof/Communication Arts at St. Thomas University on October 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Excellent pionts - but the author left out that other factor of class. Isn't some of the identity and values being regulated here that of the upper middle class? Is it more class than ethnicity? Which identity marker is more powerful/significant? What is the role of black middle class versus white America in the dilemma?

  • Questions
  • Posted by Jameel A. Scott , Student at University of Maryland on October 22, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Over the past few days I have been inundated with questions and comments surrounding this dress code issue. It is surprising to me that out of all the possible reasoning for a top tier HBCU to be in the news and get so much coverage, this is what was put forth. A few months ago, splattered all over the news were articles about style and dress at HBCUs, which singled Morehouse out as one of the campuses where students had great style of dress and fashion. Before that was articles about a white valedictorian. However, with all this said and after reading Marybeth’s response a few questions arise for me. First how do we attack racism? A loaded question, which can be answered in many ways, but I most interested in looking at this question from the context of black students and their sense of autonomy of dress and conduct. Racism has been apart of our society since its genesis and continues to plague us today. Additionally, can we expand the conversation to the dichotomy between the essence of us building up our young men within the boundaries of our controlled areas, and the intended and purposed perceptions and achievements put forth to the general public about our young men.

  • Morehouse dress code
  • Posted by rosanne soifer , adjunct prof. Music Business in Digital Media Arts at Touro College, NYC on October 22, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Thanks for addressing a somewhat bothersome issue. I include a  dress code ( no droopy pants, underwear showing, elaborate headgear, pulled down caps, sunglasses, etc.) in my class handout. The primary  reason I give for doing so is : Appropriateness to a  business/academic environment---which many of them have never experienced before.   A large number of  the students  in our  program are males, non-traditional students, low income, minority--or a combination of any of these demographics. By having a dress code, I feel I can at least attempt to level the playing field for them when it comes to finding a job and being taken seriously!

  • Morehouse
  • Posted by Mike Williams , Vice President for Advancement at Faith-Based institution on October 22, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • I applaud Morehouse for this bold and counter-cultural move. Dr. Gasman certainly is correct when she discusses the prevalence of bigotry that still pervades our society. However, I believe the Morehouse move transcends a discussion of race. It appears to be an attempt on their part to promote a culture that fosters of leadership--a culture that even extends into what is determined as appropriate dress. The “real world” that I live in ignores people who wear clothing with lewd comments, pajamas in public, or pants hanging around your ankles regardless of the color of their skin. I think that they want a Morehouse man to be a person of influence. Why dilute that influence with dress unbecoming of a professional?
    The most disturbing part of this piece is the comment made by Mr. Gallien where he asks the question whether women’s colleges, HBCU’s, and evangelical colleges are important enough to matter. The irony of this question is almost humorous. We criticize Morehouse for being intolerant of what they deem inappropriate self expression. In the same comment, we are intolerant of institutions with distinctive missions, traditions, and cultures. Tolerance is a two-way street.

  • Response
  • Posted by Louis Gallien , Distinguished Professor at Regent University on October 22, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I did not state that they were not worthwhile nor important, since I have either graduated from one and have taught at the two other's mentioned. My concern is survival. I failed to mentioned there are only five men's colleges around (two of those are coordinate--Hobart and St. John's and Morehouse with Spelman right across the street and free cross-registration is almost a coordinate) So, men's institutions are a goner--so to speak..(Wabash, H-Sydney)

    Dress codes, creeds, drinking, dancing, transgendered issues will be largely irrelevant if "exclusive" institutions do not survive. I call this with the advent of the Obama administration the spirit of inclusion.

    So, my larger issue is: Who will send their children to these institutions if faithful alumni are choosing less expensive public institutions or more prestigious academically-reputable (whatever that is to folks) institutions?

  • Racism? Bigotry?
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on October 23, 2009 at 11:00pm EDT
  • A good article. Good responses. With one exception, in my opinion: the assumption that to equate the negative style choices by young black men with the black community in general is an example of racism and bigotry. Not at all. It is a fact that the styles in question originated in the ghetto and are standard garb for young thugs and gang members who reside there. Reality is reality.