Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

Should I Put My Students on a Melting Iceberg?

October 10, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The lucky ones are on the iceberg. Too many others are in the frigid water, the 21st century U.S. death we just call poverty. Bedford/St. Martin's, the publisher, called Monday looking for a student from 2007 for permission to publish his English 111 essay in a textbook. I can’t find the student.

More than a year ago I won a modest fellowship to write about the finances and other inequities in community colleges. I’m embedded at Bunker Hill Community College in Boston, with no plans to leave. Every story I file unearths few answers and more questions. My editor here at Inside Higher Ed is anxious to move on to the movie deal and has suggested, often, that a summation is in order. The story continues to be the questions.

Why is educating the poor such a dreary issue, when even droning Al Gore can win a Nobel Prize on global warming? Isn’t spewing of millions of bright but undereducated people into the economy as dangerous and expensive for society as any environmental toxins? How has the environment cornered all the glamour in public policy? Look at all those happening environmental organizations and ideas: The Sierra Club. The Nature Conservancy. The World Wildlife Fund. Earthwatch and Lester Brown and Plan 3.O. I watched the documentary, Everything’s Cool. I just don’t see, as in the film, a bunch of white kids from elite colleges spending Saturday at a conference about educating the poor.

We know the six million credit students now in community colleges have little chance of completing even an associate degree. Yet, community college is voluntary. These are individuals who, against the odds, choose education over extra food in the kitchen and who, often on top of 50- and 60-hour work schedules, choose to come to school and learn.

Here’s an e-mail from a student last week: “My 10 mo. old daughter is very sick and I have been at the hospital since last night. She will get monitored all day today to track her progress. I will email some assignments later today. Thanks in advance!” His daughter has meningitis. He did e-mail me the homework.

Causes need a visual. I can’t find one for community colleges. With the Wal-Marting of America, the students have perfectly normal clothes. Their pain and their wounds are of the soul. In theory, I have no trouble making comparison of these students with James Nachtwey’s Thirty-Seven Pictures the World Must See. In 2008 terms, the lives of my students are close enough to Walker Evans from Let Us Now Praise Famous Men or even Jacob Riis, who coined How the Other Half Lives. Community colleges compared with Third World suffering? However true, I’d be laughed off the American Council on Education conference panel on that topic, if ACE ever had the guts to have such a panel.

Do we, the people, really want to educate the poor?

Federal policies today shut the doors to the poor as tightly as state laws kept James Meredith out of Ole Miss in 1961. Recent reauthorizations of the federal Higher Education Act futz around at the edges. No one has a plan to open the doors to the millions shut out.

Before the fall semester opened, a friend called about a Boston public school student who had been denied a federal Pell Grant, the primary aid for the poor, because he could not produce a W-2 for 2007. But this student had no income for 2007. Now what? He had to prove that he had no income. (Proving a negative?) Another adult student, self-supporting and living alone, was at last persuaded to return to school. He had to turn back from registering because he couldn’t produce his mother’s federal tax form. Those students enrolled, but no one knows how many students had no one to help. These situations are not the work of untrained bureaucrats. These are federal requirements that institutions ignore at their peril.

Remember, winners of these federal grants – barely $4,000 for a full year and usually less -- do not receive the funds in a brown paper bag of unmarked tens and twenties that they could, say, spend on food for their families. Remember that all the students this fall at Williams and Yale and the rest of the Ivies, and at Amherst and Grinnell, receive federal subsidies via tax policy of at least $25,000 per student. Fair enough. Do our federal policies require the children whose parents are wealthy to submit their parents’ tax forms to enroll and receive the $25,000 federal subsidy? No.

Why aren’t there any national leaders?

How about the Congressional Caucus for Community Colleges, now up to 33 Senators and 205 House members? I’ve been in polite contact with the staffers of that for more than a year. Any plans? Anything on the table? Any meetings? Nope.

The trade associations – the American Association of Community Colleges and the Association of Community College Trustees – have all the work they can handle with the immediate crises, losing even more funding. Campuses have as presidents great leaders – Cha Guzman at Palo Alto Community College (Texas) and Gail Mellow at LaGuardia Community College and Mary Fifield at Bunker Hill Community College are ones I’ve seen in action. The presidents of the 1,200 community colleges have 48-hour days just keeping their strained campuses operating.

No one today has a plan on the table for these motivated students, for the 6.5 million credit or the 5 million non-credit or trade school students. You’d think some presidential candidate might be looking for 11.5 million votes.

What about community college faculty?

In the public debates that do exist, the plight of community college students has most of the attention. What about the faculty? These are people who teach four and five and even six classes each semester. These are classes of 20 and 30 and 40 students who arrive through open enrollment. These are not the homogenized groupings, carefully sorted by an admissions office that one finds at flagship state universities and the elite privates. These faculty are exhausted. I have not found a solid plan for faculty relief.

What’s the point of improving student aid alone for community college students without equal relief for faculty workloads? Sending more students to an already exhausted faculty makes no sense. Adding to the complexity, an overworked faculty is, sadly, a key component of the low cost of attending community college.

I e-mailed some questions to the press offices of the unions that represent community college faculty, the National Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the American Association of University Professors (AAUP). That’s for another column. The AFT replied right away and has given the matter solid thought. The replies of the NEA, my union, fall short, for now, of what I’d expect for my $835.75 in dues. The AAUP did not reply at all. That one stings. Back in my management days, I was on a team that found money for raises for AAUP faculty.

Whose job is educating the poor? Or, is “Random Acts of Kindness” a viable national education policy?

Management and Leadership 101 are clear that making something happen requires someone whose job depends on that something happening.

Who is accountable for educating the poor? Who is responsible for able, motivated students who want to be in college but can't find the money, just for skills never mind four-year degrees? Policy groups such as the Institute for College Access and Success, led by Bob Shireman, and Education Trust, led by Kati Haycock, are effective advocates for these students. No individual or institution, however, is accountable for the students left out.

I mean the student from from my course last semester, who dodged bullets and dead bodies to get to high school in Africa. A colleague and I tracked her down last week because she's not here this semester. "Hi Wick Sloane, am so happy to get your email, i try to register for the fall but i was having some problem with financial Aid, and i could not afford to pay for myself. but i am trying to start in the spring.” Our national policy is random acts of kindness.

The U.S. higher education system has emerged, without ill intent as far as I can see, to favor institutions over students. If institutional budgets are in balance that's sufficient. No one pays a penalty for able students left out when classes start each semester. Why not?

Will my students all live through this semester?

A student last spring won a James Baldwin Scholarship at Hampshire College. It’s a wonderful program, with the counseling and support to ensure that the poor can make the transition to a four-year college. This student’s Boston high school had launched him to Hampshire; we just gave him a cup of Gatorade as he ran by. He planned to spend the summer working near his home, the same neighborhood where another of my students was shot and killed. We checked in over the summer. A lot. The week before Labor Day I learned that the student had arrived at Hampshire and moved into his room and begun orientation. In a move uncharacteristic of my genus and species, dead white male, I found tears in my eyes. He was safe at Hampshire. He was alive.

Can a nation that can back into and finance a $3-trillion dollar war in Iraq and then find $800 billion more for the federal bailouts of financial institutions run by deficient M.B.A.s claim the inability to finance a basic education for the 11.5 million in community colleges? As to these poor, must we admit to being only the nation that ignored genocides in Rwanda and starvation in Darfur. Or are we a better country than that?

One I can answer: Why do community colleges rock?

Ken Burns, the filmmaker, came to Bunker Hill Community College for a talk last year. Afterwards, Burns said of the students, “I saw the future of America. The future looks good.”

I am not publishing the photos I took of my students, to learn their names quickly. I don’t have permission, and I decided not to ask. These are citizens, not poster children. A great visual for an obscure columnist may not be good for them. (The students on the iceberg are models from clip art.) Their languages are Arabic and Somali and Creole and French and Spanish and Russian and English. My favorite photo is the man who is a U.S. Marine veteran, from Boston, who served in Iraq standing beside a Moroccan woman in a white headscarf.

Walt Whitman would know why community colleges rock -- it’s “I Hear America Singing” all the way.

I HEAR America singing, the varied carols I hear;
Those of mechanics -- each one singing his, as it should be, blithe and strong;
The carpenter singing his, as he measures his plank or beam,
The mason singing his, as he makes ready for work, or leaves off work;
The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat -- the deckhand singing on the steamboat deck;
The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench -- the hatter singing as he stands;
The wood-cutter’s song -- the ploughboy’s, on his way in the morning, or at the noon intermission, or at sundown;
The delicious singing of the mother -- or of the young wife at work -- or of the girl sewing or washing -- Each singing what belongs to her, and to none else;
The day what belongs to the day -- At night, the party of young fellows, robust, friendly,
Singing, with open mouths, their strong melodious songs.

Wick Sloane, who writes The Devil’s Workshop for Inside Higher Ed, won a fellowship to write about community colleges from the Hechinger Institute at Teachers College, Columbia University. This is the sixth of his reports from that work. He is also the author of the just published “Common Sense,” a pamphlet asking if the bachelor’s degree is obsolete. Download the pamphlet free here.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Should I Put My Students on a Melting Iceberg?

  • Faculty
  • Posted by Sean Murphy , Professor of English at College of Lake County on October 10, 2008 at 11:40am EDT
  • The section about exhausted faculty members in this article interests me. I still wonder how faculty at my college teach 5 classes face-to-face. About 7 years ago, I opted to teach 2 online courses so I could be the type of teacher I wanted to be with my 3 face-to-face classes.

    The larger issue, though, seems to be one of attraction. Are community colleges attracting faculty who have the intellectual curiosity and depth of disciplinary knowledge to honor our students' efforts, students who fit school into complicated and busy lives?

    I read in an article written by a PhD at a community college who claimed that it takes a gallon of wisdom to impart a drop of knowledge.

    To my way of thinking, a 30-credit MA in English or any other discipline (a pint of wisdom?) does not prepare future faculty members to work in a community college, to know the discipline they teach, to understand the landscape of higher education and the community college movement's place within it, or to engage the complexities of being a public intellectual. Indeed, many MAs are hostile to PhDs, universities, and thoughtful reflection.

    Answers? None at the ready, I'm afraid.

  • @ Mr. Murphy
  • Posted by Adam Schenck , English instructor on October 10, 2008 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Saying a 30-credit MA isn't enough to make a great instructor is an unfair generalization. At every level of education, it's a matter of motivation: *doing the work* as well as having the insight to realize *what is real teaching*. I'm one of those people with "only" an MA, and I just found that I was the only faculty member in my department who students reviewed as "giving a lot of good feedback" on student writing. And I thought I was doing the minimum.

    Further, good teaching puts the integrity of the discipline (be it English, sociology, accounting, etc.) above the self-interest of one individual student. That means being sympathetic to students, but never lowering standards. Again, the credential of the instructor -- MA, MBA, PhD -- doesn't matter here.

    You are right, however, in that some teaching-only instructors with an MA regard research-I and -II PhD professors as absent-minded Laputans. Tacking more coursework onto a 30-credit MA wouldn't have an effect on this. And I think the critique does have some credence. In fact, I agree with that argument, as a person who went through a top-40 MA program where the teaching of English composition was usually regarded as a waste of time.

    In sum, the credential of the educator matters far less than whether the educator has the insight, motivation, and skill to do the work that makes good teaching.

  • the problem is here
  • Posted by bradley bleck , instructor at Spokane Falls CC on October 10, 2008 at 1:15pm EDT
  • One indicator of the level of caring about what goes on in the community colleges can be found right here on IHE. It's the dearth of comments regarding anything to do with community colleges. Maybe it's because it's seen as someone else's problem, or maybe people in higher ed just don't know, or just don't care, still seeing the community college as a lesser institution because we work first and foremost to educate the student. If the rest of higher ed doesn't care, how can anyone else be expected to?

  • CC
  • Posted by DFS on October 10, 2008 at 4:20pm EDT
  • If you want to teach, then come to the community college. Please don't send resumes which are bereft of statements on why you want a job with us. If it's apparent that you just want some kind of job security on your way to bigger and better things, please don't waste our time; just move on to those things.

    If you want to teach people, then come on board. Some will want to go on for more education; some will not. All will want to learn. This is evident by the hurdles they are overcoming before your very eyes.

    The CC students are more representative of our society. If you don't want this venue, then move on.

    But if you can interact with your students, and help them make decisions which enable them to achieve their goals -- even if they did't realize that those goals were within their reach -- then you have truly made a difference in their lives, and thus in the world.

    We know how it usually turns out for you at the university level. How aware are you of each of them? How much impact can you have on them? Sometimes enough, but sometimes not.

    It all depends on you, and how you want to spend your day, each day.

  • Attitudes
  • Posted by Enough with the class war on October 11, 2008 at 5:40am EDT
  • DFS: take the chip off your shoulder. It's one of the unattractive things that prevents talented people from applying for jobs in community colleges.

  • Mutual Aid Societies
  • Posted by R.J. O'Hara at The Collegiate Way on October 11, 2008 at 5:40am EDT
  • Wick Sloane always makes me think. That's a high compliment. This time he's got me thinking about "House systems as mutual aid societies":

    http://collegiateway.org/news/2008-community-colleges

  • Re: Attitudes
  • Posted by DFS on October 11, 2008 at 8:55pm EDT
  • Sorry about that. I re-read my stuff and I think I came across the way you said I did.

    We are presently going through resumes from some "great" people. The more senior ones here -- belonging most definitely to your picture -- are opposed to those I want to interview; e.g., one has a list of some 20 publications, followed by another list of some 25 patents. How can one not want to interview this guy? Yes, he's old, but so what? (These people with pull will prevail.)

    But several have stated that they are pursuing their doctorates, while their resumes arrive as part of some "bulk" communication. This is what I should have identified as the "waste of time."

    I guess that I'm just wishing for some of these actually intriguing people to also provide a customized thought about us. (Should they or should they not have to do this?) This would be something I could then employ in their favor. (In fact, if we just hired the lot of them -- while replacing all of us -- I think we could serve our CC better!)

    Again, I apologize for appearing to be of such an obstructionist nature. I guess that I didn't understand that many people encountered such attitudes when applying at our "lowly-regarded" institutions.

  • Posted by Geoffrey Hooker , former instructor, mathematics at Northern Virginia Community College on October 14, 2008 at 5:20am EDT
  • I wonder, with all the increasing costs and decreasing student abilities (I had one student who could not do 37 x 10 without a calculator), if we are looking at the last generation of universal college education.

    Does college increase salaries? Studies show that people who go to college (and finish) typically earn more. Who goes to college? Smart kids and kids whose parents are rich. Who would make more money anyway? Smart people and people whose parents are rich.

  • Damned Straight!!!
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on October 14, 2008 at 4:00pm EDT
  • As I recall, during the past few years DFS and I have been on opposite sides of what I consider to be important issues in InsideHigherEd. On the other hand ...

    1. it is my opinion that (i) community colleges are already incredibly important in higher education today and (ii) if our system of higher education were properly structured (forget about Margaret Spellings’ recommendations), our community colleges would be at the center of both higher education in these United States and an intelligent revision of how we can restructure higher education in a manner that is consistent with a liberal-arts-centered, life-long learning model of learning.

    2. DFS’s “Re:Attitudes” post above is the best thing I have read in InsideHigherEd in, what?, maybe four years.

    Now, DFS, if you’ve got a job for one of those “old timers” ...

  • Dr. Manley (et.al.)
  • Posted by DFS on October 14, 2008 at 5:30pm EDT
  • We just had a department meeting this afternoon to decide on the interviewees (God, how I sometimes hate our language!).

    I was amazed that one of the powerful decided out of hand to oppose a Nigerian woman because she happened to graduate with a 4.0 from one particular historically black institution in our state.

    The department chair stated that oral communication was not the problem, and reminded us that the woman's GPA was very good. This was pointless, since the woman opposed to the Nigerian is part of a married couple who -- conveniently denied Chair opportunities due to their marriage and employment here -- has both been teaching here for over 35 years, her husband for 40.

    So much pull; so little responsibility . . .

    Further, the selection process was predetermined in favor of someone we could predict would furnish 10 years of their life -- in other words, old-timers need not apply.

    The good news is that one of the "accepted" applicants is a black man -- a former student here -- but he doesn't have our requisite graduate credit hours in our discipline, so the plan is to let him teach developmental stuff while pursuing a correct graduate degree.

    He went to another historically black university -- the same one I attended for two degrees -- so I presume that the Nigerian woman chose the "unfavored" place to attend.

    What really irks me is that we could not collectively set aside minimal time to give her a chance, while she lives now in the next county.

    Now, never fear, Dr. Manley, the Power Couple will retire soon, and so the standards will change back to what they should have been already.

    If I give you my email address, I'll be doomed. But, I'm still trying to do the right thing . . .

  • I would like to return . . .
  • Posted by DFS on October 14, 2008 at 7:45pm EDT
  • Just to say that this was an excellent article. This is obviously something on the minds of us all. Thanks.