Search Views


Browse Archives

Views

The View From the Peanut Gallery

March 21, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Time to call the game on higher education reform. To throw open the window and scream, “I can’t take it anymore!” I’ve been at this for decades. Nothing unusual about my day today.  

Two uniformed doormen opened the doors of the five-star Copley Plaza Hotel for me today. I was, after all, on my way into the gold leaf, mirrored Versailles lobby, as Testimony # 38, at a public hearing by the U.S. Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. So my tag said.  

Where better to look down the money hole of U.S. higher education than Copley Square? Named after an aristocratic 18th-century painter, the square is a trapezoid. Why didn’t Susan Hockfield, president of MIT, use this as an example in her testimony about the need for math education?  

Tobacco chiefs declaring no relation between cancer and smoking could learn from college presidents and cost. In the morning, speaking by invitation only, were presidents and chancellors. The foxes on henhouse security. No one gagged when Larry Bacow, president of Tufts University, really said, “Our costs are completely beyond our control.” No one even laughed.

Of the presidents, only Mary Fifield of Bunker Hill Community College actually brought suggestions or mentioned the odds against low-income students graduating from college or the scandal of merit scholarships for the rich at the expense of Pell Grants to the poor.

Bacow and Hockfield were long gone for the only voice raised in outrage all day. Jason Pramas, a student at the University of Massachusetts at Boston, testified, “Needless to say, we’re skeptical about the commission. It seems stacked with corporate representatives, conservative think tanks, Bush appointees,” he said. “And holding a bare handful of meetings and small public hearings like this one seems a rather poor way of taking the pulse of American higher education.”  

At the hotel front desk, I asked Tenneal Banks if she planned to testify. “No, I’m working.” Every day, she leaves Providence, R.I., at 5 a.m. to work in Boston at the hotel. She’s back for night school at Johnson and Wales University every evening. A full course load. What would she say to the commission? Too hard to raise the money to pay for her education.

Sean Comeau, a staffer on the concierge floor, also wasn’t testifying. He had years of loans to pay off.  He thought the commission should give more status to community colleges. “No one at my high school would admit that’s where they were going.  But it’s the only way in for lots of people.”  

Did the Copley Plaza have a tuition reimbursement plan, I asked another, who just laughed.  “You can’t have my name or I’ll get into trouble,” she said.  

I had signed up for the hearing on the Web a couple weeks ago.  E-mail last week brought confirmation of my three minutes to testify.  

“We encourage you to address the following issues and questions:

  • How accessible is higher education today? Is this changing?
  • Do students have access to the institutions best suited to their needs and abilities?
  • What is the real cost of educating college students?

And so on. With Pell Grants frozen (and Bush proposing yet another year’s freeze), with commercial banks charging usurious interest rates for student loans, with cuts in student aid, why not the Copley Plaza? At $279 plus tax per night, the best rate according to the hotel’s Web site, I figure the hearing cost at least two Pell Grants. Henry Hardenbergh, architect of the Copley Plaza, also designed the Plaza in New York. As Terry Perlin, my History 101 professor years ago at Williams College, used to say, “I have nothing against fiction. But who needs it? The truth is unbelievable.” The February commission meeting was at a seaside resort in San Diego.  

I have this crazy idea that the U.S. can afford to educate everyone to a level of literacy and math sufficient to have choices in their own lives. I’ve done hard time as the CFO of a state university system. I packed my day-job colleagues at work off to India this week and took a day off to testify. In a hotel basement conference room. Ninety-nine percent white audience. Few younger than 40. Most of us older.  

Here’s the set piece. I’ve heard it hundreds of times. The presidents go on with the usual prattle about how much more college graduates earned. Never mind that the earnings come long after student loans are due. And the presidents are long gone by the afternoon public testimony, where even students at the supposedly less expensive state schools described their staggering debt load. Where were the students from Harvard or MIT? Or my schools, Williams and Yale?

Nine presidents had the morning to themselves, with no time limits. We, the people, had three minutes each and a timer with lights and a buzzer. Yellow light for 30 seconds remaining. Red light and the buzzer meant stop talking. Nearly 50 speakers, students, trade groups, a brave young woman with Down syndrome whose federal aid had been cut, crammed into the same time as the nine presidents.  

Joshua Chaisson, from the University of Southern Maine, one of the only students, stood beside me at the back of the room in the morning.  

“I’m the only person from all of the state of Maine. That pisses me off,” he said. “None of the presidents or chancellors. The students are more active than the people paid $250,000 to run the system.” Chaisson is the first generation in his family to go to college. A junior economics major, he’d skipped three classes to be there.  

On my way out -- I’d hit the red light and the buzzer -- I stopped for commissioner David Ward, president of the American Council on Education. I gave him a gentle pat on the back. He was talking to a reporter.  

“Go for it. We’re expecting great things from you,” I said. He rolled his eyes and said, “Right.”  

Wick Sloane is chief operating officer at Generon Consulting in Massachusetts.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The View From the Peanut Gallery

  • Usurious?
  • Posted by B.J. on March 21, 2006 at 6:11am EST
  • From Webster's, a definition of usurious: "an unconscionable or exorbitant rate or amount of interest; specifically: interest in excess of a legal rate charged to a borrower for the use of money."

    The former can be argued until pigs fly out of the debaters' butts. The latter is quite clear; were commercial banks really charging usurious rates, they'd be ENRON'ed.

    Also: whether one student spoke, or thousands spoke, the bottom line's the same: money is money. Even the now-defunct USSR and Mao's China borrowed money from Wall Street. I imagine good ol' Uncle Joe saying, "get in line, kid."

  • Delightful!
  • Posted by Isaac Bickerstaff on March 21, 2006 at 8:20am EST
  • I must say, some of Inside Higher Ed's readers do provide the most entertaining spectacle. What ever could the point of the above comment be? How could it be related to the topic of the above essay? Oh, that is where the fun is to be found. We will puzzle and puzzle and puzzle.

    Well played, sir!

  • A 1800's era novel come to life ...
  • Posted by Alan Lott , Professor on March 21, 2006 at 9:50am EST
  • "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness . . . it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair".

    It is amazing how Dickens could have seen the future so clearly or is this just history repeating itself? For me, I was the first, and only, child in my family to graduate from college. Although I reached my goal of becoming a college professor, I will make my last student loan payment when I am 71 years old. Was the cost (personal and monetary) worth it? I am honestly not sure.

    A pity that K-20 education doesn't have a decent (no cap on total amount and available to all) loan payback program ... why don't we? Perhaps we could lure and retain more of the "best and the brightest" and attract more lower income students if we offered this kind of incentive.

  • Community colleges -- an alternative to student debt
  • Posted by B.J. on March 21, 2006 at 12:20pm EST
  • Having attended community college (early high school grad) and taught at a CC -- I see the best of America. People with a strong work ethic, positive attitudes, and practical common sense.

    They aren't wringing their hands, crying "the sky is falling." They decided to do something about their situation, themselves. Better than drowning in debt and whining at Ordinary State U.

  • Tuition and Quality
  • Posted by Quaker Prof on March 22, 2006 at 5:15pm EST
  • I enjoyed this piece, but I wonder why more of us are not talking about one source of tuition increases: "competitiveness" in the price-is-quality game.

    I was once on the alumni board of my small alma mater, a private liberal arts college. We were told matter of factly at one meeting that the college set its tuition by taking a national index of tuition levels at private colleges and adding a fixed percentage to it. If the index increased, so did tuition. Alumni funds were used to subsidize scholarships, many of which were only necessary because of the mechanical increases in tuition. This, apparently, is common practice at private colleges.

    Asked why they used this approach, they said that otherwise, parents would think that the quality of the college was lower than that of high-priced peers.

    This assumes, basically, that parents evaluate universities using two measures- price and what the neighbors will think, and I think it commits a crime against students who leave college with massive debt.