Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Upwardly Mobile Academic: Marvin Krislov

Oberlin College’s next president, Marvin Krislov, has plenty of experience tackling controversy. As general counsel at the University of Michigan, he played a key role in the university’s successful defense before the U.S. Supreme Court of the right to use affirmative action in admissions. He is moving to Oberlin to succeed Nancy Dye, president since 1994. Dye has faced faculty criticism in recent years as Oberlin struggled with tight budgets and she announced her plans to retire as president last year following complaints from faculty leaders about whether the board was adequately reviewing her performance. Krislov responded to questions via e-mail about his interest in moving to Oberlin.

Q: Your education and your academic career to date have been at research universities. What is the attraction for you to a liberal arts college/conservatory?

A: Oberlin is one of our nation’s greatest institutions of higher education, and I deeply admire its historic and ongoing commitment to inclusion and excellence. A liberal arts education is especially pertinent in challenging times that demand flexible, broad thinking. My family and I also are committed to the performing arts and I look forward to supporting the Oberlin Conservatory and enjoying the many arts-related activities on campus.Many of the facilities are comparable to those at a graduate school — the supercomputer; four libraries housing 2.3 million items; a world-class museum and conservatory of music; more than 400 concerts and recitals as well as 40 theater and dance productions and two
operas each year; and so on.

On the other hand, a small, residential liberal arts college embodies an intense sense of community and an engagement in ongoing campus conversations that are more difficult at a large university. Furthermore, the faculty emphasis on teaching over research, and the ability to interact with students on a consistent basis, distinguishes Oberlin from a larger research university.

Q: The economics of liberal arts colleges are increasingly challenging — at Oberlin and elsewhere — leading institutions to consider changes in enrollment policy, aid policy, mission, etc. What are your thoughts on how liberal arts colleges can best succeed these days financially?

A: Liberal arts colleges and other higher education institutions have enormous cost pressures that are likely to increase in the coming years. Private support is extremely important so that liberal arts colleges can continue to provide high quality education to diverse students. There will inevitably be important discussions about priorities. But I think it critical to keep in mind the mission and the core values at an institution like Oberlin, even in the face of budgetary pressure.

Q: Oberlin is a college where professors and students take shared governance (and critiquing the president) very seriously. What’s your approach to leading in an environment where the relatively small size can lead to extra scrutiny, and where there have been tensions about decision-making?

A: It speaks highly of the dedication to Oberlin that faculty, staff and students feel the stake in its governance and its future. I applaud that sentiment and support the values of shared governance. I plan to learn as much as I possibly can about the various views on campus and to lead discussions that are productive, open and honest. While there may be times where people have differences of opinion, I would hope that this approach would promote mutual respect and understanding. During the presidential search process, but even more so at the open forums during my visit to campus last week, it was clear that Oberlin students, especially, are very confident in expressing their opinions. I think that’s a healthy situation.

Q: How will your background as a lawyer and as a lawyer for a university affect your perspective as president?

A: My background as a lawyer can help me understand and analyze various perspectives on issues, and may allow me to think about the processes for making decisions. As someone who has worked inside many institutions, I hope that I have learned how to listen to people with different views and to try to mediate those perspectives. I have been privileged to teach courses both in the undergraduate political science department and in the law school at the University of Michigan and I would draw upon those experiences as a teacher and mentor as well.

Q: At Michigan, one of your top issues was affirmative action, which voters there have now rejected in a referendum. If other states follow, do you think private colleges like Oberlin will play more of a role than perhaps public universities in educating diverse student bodies?

A: Oberlin is very proud of its history in this regard — do you see Oberlin positioned to do new things in diversifying the student body? Oberlin has an historic commitment to diversity. Besides the obvious milestones — it was the first institution of higher education in America to adopt a policy to admit students of color (1835) and the first college to award bachelor’s degrees to women (1841) in a coeducational program — the college has found ways under many historical and economic circumstances to reaffirm its commitment to these fundamental values. Oberlin continues to support these values today. In association with the college’s 2005 strategic plan, the trustees adopted a resolution to “significantly improve our admissions yield and retention of African American and other students of color, as well as first-generation and low income students.” I have been honored to support the University of Michigan’s strong commitment to diversity and inclusion. Oberlin’s historic commitment to these values inspires me as well. I am confident that Oberlin will continue to lead in educating diverse populations and to making higher education affordable and accessible.

Scott Jaschik

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

As a student here at Oberlin, I would say the general opinion of the student body regarding Mr. Krislov’s upcoming presidency is “cautiously optimistic.” He’s saying all the right things, and he appears to be listening to our opinions (something we felt Nancy Dye rarely if ever did), but we’re going to wait and see.

Tim, Student at Oberlin College, at 12:50 pm EDT on May 17, 2007

“I have been honored to support the University of Michigan’s strong commitment to diversity and inclusion.”

This is Orwellian language. Mr. Krislov supported racial discrimination in admissions to a public university, a policy wisely and clearly rejected by the people of Michigan and one which will again be unconsitutional in less than 25 years. Oberlin is a private insitution and is as free to practice discrimination in admissions as Wellesley College but let’s talk clearly about what happens under the guise of affirmative action.

End It Now, at 9:40 am EDT on May 18, 2007

another UM person rewarded

This is at least the fourth member of the Michigan hierarchy who has been “rewarded” with a college presidency (see also Cornell, Syracuse, Columbia) for taking the lead in the affirmative action case. A perverse result when the court struck down half of Michigan’s policies as illegal and accepted the other half despite the mismatch between numbers of minorities admitted and claims that a critical mass was needed for learning.

faculty member, at 2:00 pm EDT on May 18, 2007

Faculty Member, I am trying to follow your logic.

There seems to be a contradiction in your argument. First of all, schools get sued all the time. Most of their lawsuits are defended by outside counsel, and in-house counsel usually takes a hands-off approach. In this case, you either fault him for being involved and not winning, or not being involved in not winning.

On the law school side, U. Michigan prevailed. Therefore, you either credit him for winning (and taking a hands-on approach), or nothing. Instead, you seem to blame him for winning, because the court agreed with him. (It would seem that you were somehow victimized by affirmative action, and therefore you have an axe to grind against the policy.)

In-house counsel, by themselves, can only recommend against (or in favor) of an affirmative action policy. No matter what your views on AA, you must realize that the two sides are extremely polarized. For that reason, most in-house counsel do not think it is their role to take a position on whether AA is good policy or not. As the Supreme Court decided, at least some AA is legal, and as many schools seem to indicate, it is good policy. You seem to be arguing that a GC should guess which way a referendum or popular vote will go in the future.

(“End it now” calls it “racial discrimination” when, at worst, the only people hurt were white kids with lower grades than other white kids. It isn’t as if U. Michigan actually prohibited white kids from attending. In reality, most white kids, because of their socio-economic background were better able to live their lives in a way that met U. Michigan’s criteria for admission.)

Whatever the case, folks like Krislov will always have to deal with controversial issues. There will be no pleasing everyone. Moreover, it is likely that in the future, more GCs, and law school professors will be presidents of colleges, and since the legal matters often arouse passions amongst the masses, you will have plenty of presidents to criticize for the positions they took at their old job.

Larry, at 9:55 am EDT on May 19, 2007

Krisolv and Oberlin and End it Now

Question for “End It Now” — I truly do not follow your concluding statement about Wellesley College and its right, since it is a “private” institution, to practice discrimination in admissions.

Being “private” (independent) or “public” (state) does not exempt an institution from many laws or regulations prohibting discrimination. Now, if you mean that Wellesley does not have to admit men, I think that is because its charter defines it as a college for women. Please explain your comment.

John Thelin

John Thelin, Professor at University of Kentucky, at 8:35 am EDT on May 22, 2007

Oberlin’s Reaction to Krislov

The “cautiously optimistic” language comes from the headline printed in the Oberlin Review’s story related to the campus reaction to Mr. Krislov’s visit. Please visit www.oberlinreview.org if you wish to read more about the campus reaction to Mr. Krislov.

Katie, “Cautiously Optimistic” at Oberlin College, at 4:35 am EDT on May 23, 2007

An Excellent Choice for Oberlin

Mr. Krislov is an excellent choice for Oberlin. Most of the criticisms of his selection appear to be from people who will never be satisfied until (a) they are consulted and (b) their position on issue X or Y is adopted in toto. It’s impossible to find someone who will be ‘acceptable’ to all the different constituencies at Oberlin.

OldObie, at 2:15 pm EDT on June 7, 2007

Wellesley’s legal status

John — Wellesley’s ability to admit only women comes not from its charter, but from the fact that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 provides a specific exemption for private, single-sex institutions. Thus, that is why Wellesley has remained single sex while the Citadel was forced to admit women.

Don Heller, Professor at Pennsylvania State University, at 1:40 pm EDT on June 14, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Upwardly Mobile Academic: Marvin Krislov

or search for jobs directly.

Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center-Downtown Denver

Posting Description: The University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine is seeking a new Chairperson for ... see job

Director — Office of Equal Opportunity and Access
Western Illinois University

APPOINTMENT: Position available May 1, 2009. Start date negotiable. QUALIFICATIONS: Master’s Degree, a minimum of three ... see job

Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Bennington College

The CIO will play an integral role in providing leadership for addressing questions of how technology impacts teaching, ... see job

Director of Business & Enterprise Services (DBES)
University of California, Los Angeles

Under the general direction of the Deputy University Librarian (DUL) and University Librarian (UL), the Director of Business ... see job

Associate Claims Counsel
United Educators Insurance

United Educators Insurance, the premier risk management and insurance company serving colleges, universities, and K-12 public ... see job

Executive Director of Tilikum Center for Retreats and Outdoor Ministries
George Fox University

George Fox University seeks an Executive Director for its Tilikum Center for Retreats and Outdoors Ministries. see job

Executive Director for Front Range Board of Cooperative Educational Services for Teacher Leadership
University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center-Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora

Posting Description: The School of Education and Human Development (SEHD) at the University of Colorado ... see job

Executive Director, CU-Advance Center
Cornell University

Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is an inclusive, dynamic, and innovative Ivy League university and New ... see job

Associate Claims Counsel
United Educators Insurance

United Educators Insurance, the premier risk management and insurance company serving colleges, universities, and K-12 public ... see job

Executive Director of Cultural and Special Programs
Elon University

Elon University is a dynamic, private comprehensive institution known for excellent arts and sciences along with outstanding ... see job