George Mason University on Thursday announced that it had renamed its law school the Antonin Scalia School of Law. The law school also received $20 million from an anonymous donor and $10 million from the Charles Koch Foundation, a high-profile funder of conservative causes.
Those gifts, the combined amount being the largest ever received by George Mason, will be used to create three new scholarships for law students, the university said. One of the scholarships also will be named for Scalia, the conservative U.S. Supreme Court associate justice who died in February. Scalia was a longtime resident of Northern Virginia, where George Mason is located.
The law school is well known for its conservative scholarship and for attracting many conservative students.
Another Beltway law school, at Georgetown University, in February issued a statement mourning Scalia's death. Some professors objected to the law school's move, saying such "unmitigated praise" should not have been attributed to the entire law school community.
A former Stanford University student and all-star swimmer was found guilty Thursday of sexually assaulting a woman on Stanford's campus. The former swimmer, Brock Turner, was accused of assaulting a woman last year, the San Jose Mercury News reported, after she attended a party on campus with her sister. Two men biking to that same party came across Turner assaulting the unconscious woman, and the pair held the swimmer down until police arrived.
Turner said he and the victim, who was not a Stanford student, left the party together and that the sex was consensual, though they were both heavily intoxicated. The woman did not wake up until more than three hours after the assault. Stanford -- which, like many institutions in recent years, has faced criticism for mishandling cases of sexual assault -- expelled Turner last year.
"Today a jury of Santa Clara County residents gave a verdict which I hope will clearly reverberate throughout colleges, in high schools, anywhere where there may be any doubt about the distinction between consent and sexual assault," Jeff Rosen, district attorney, said in a statement. "No means no, drunk means no, passed out means no and sex without consent means criminal assault."
Seven public urban universities have banded together to form a new collaboration aimed at helping more low-income, underrepresented students earn degrees. The Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) and the Coalition of Urban Serving Universities are leading the creation of the new group, which is dubbed Collaborating for Change.
“Collaborating for Change isn’t just about outlining steps public urban universities can take to improve student success, it’s about helping them actually implement those changes so we can begin to see the progress and improvement that is needed,” APLU President Peter McPherson said in a written statement.
The work will include strategies designed to admit, retain, educate and graduate at-risk students, the groups said, while reducing costs and re-examining campus business models.
The new collaboration in some ways resembles the University Innovation Alliance, a completion-oriented joint project that 11 research universities began in 2014. The alliance earlier this month announced gains in completion rates of low-income students. Georgia State University is participating in both groups.
Angry with how Ohio Dominican University has handled declining enrollment and mounting debt, a group of students and alumni are demanding that the president, Peter Cimbolic, be replaced. The university is $40 million in debt, the group wrote in a letter to the Board of Trustees. Between 2007 and 2013, enrollment declined by 40 percent. When Forbesgraded private colleges’ financial health, Ohio Dominican was one of five to receive an F.
“He has had six years to fix things, but the situation gets worse on campus every day,” Eric Rauschenbach, a member of the Alumni Council, said in an email.
In a message to the board, Cimbolic said that those problems came before his time. His presidency began in 2010 -- and between 2010 and 2013, enrollment declined only 14 percent. The $40 million in debt, he wrote, was there when he arrived. “They haven’t mentioned our graduate enrollment, which is on the rise,” said university spokesman Tom Brockman. “It’s not like we are 100 percent dependent on undergraduate enrollment.” Across Ohio, he added, many similar universities are seeing undergraduate enrollment declines.
In an email to students and staff, Cimbolic said that the group’s claims were “inaccurate or intentionally misleading.” The Board of Trustees rejected the group’s request to remove Cimbolic, saying that they stand behind the president.
Students on college campuses where there is "wide support for mental health issues" are more than 20 percent more likely to receive mental health services and 60 percent more likely to receive that help on campus, according to a new study from the RAND Corporation.
The study, to be published in the journal Psychiatric Services, is based on an online survey of nearly 34,000 students at California colleges and universities. The researchers found that 19 percent of students reported experiencing "serious psychological distress" in the past 30 days and 11 percent reported significant "mental health-related academic impairment" in the past year, including having to drop a course. About 20 percent of all students reported using mental health services while in college.
“We found that it was not just the students’ perception of campus climate that was important,” Bradley Stein, one of the study's authors and a senior scientist at RAND, said. “On campuses where the faculty and staff felt they had adequate resources and services to support students with mental health problems, there was significantly higher use of mental health services by students, both on and off campus.”
The Faculty Association of the University of British Columbia has voted no confidence in the institution's board, CBC News reported. Professors have been angry over the board's role in the departure of the president last year, and the way board leaders have responded to criticism from professors. The university released a statement after the vote in which it said that it took faculty concerns seriously and that faculty, alumni and student representatives had been to a board meeting in April to discuss governance issues.
Catharine Hill announced Tuesday that she plans to step down next June as president of Vassar College. She will have served 11 years in the position. Hill has been a leading advocate for spending more money on low-income students. In 2007, early in her tenure, Hill led Vassar to a return to need-blind admissions, a commitment some wealthier colleges have not made. The policy -- and a range of other initiatives -- has paid off in diversifying Vassar's student body. Currently, nearly 25 percent of Vassar students are eligible for Pell Grants, up 11 percentage points since 2008. Vassar has also seen gains in the enrollments of minority students, first-generation students and veterans.
A coalition of consumer groups, legal aid organizations and unions object to the state of New York joining an agreement that would change how colleges offering distance education courses in the state would be regulated. As coalition members asserted in an Inside Higher Ed article, the state would be ceding its authority to other states. Students would be left with no protection from predatory colleges, and it would make it easier for “bad actors to take advantage of students and harder for states to crack down on them.”
That all sounds ominous. It would be, if it were true.
Even in the digital era, the regulation of educational institutions is left to each state. The resulting array of requirements confuses both students and institutional faculty and staff. The State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) was created to apply consistent review standards across the states. An institution approved in its home state is eligible to enroll students (within limits) in any other SARA member state. As of this writing, 36 states have joined in a little over two years. That number may approach 45 by the end of 2016.
SARA means now there is a consistently applied set of regulations over distance education when students from one state take courses from an institution in another SARA state. Chief critic Robert Shireman, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation and former official at the U.S. Department of Education, cites Iowa as proof that “some states have discovered they can’t add more qualifications,” as if that were a surprise. Reciprocity agreements depend upon consistency. If Iowa wishes to change a policy, there is a process for regulators in the state to suggest a change. States enter into the agreement openly knowing that consistency is a requirement.
Currently, many states -- notably including New York -- have no regulations in place to protect their in-state students who enroll in courses from many out-of-state colleges. SARA’s critics depict New York as “a national leader in protecting its citizens from unfair business practices.” If a college has no other physical presence in New York other than enrolling students in an online course, it is not regulated and those students are not protected. The state has not allocated any funds to regulate the estimated hundreds of colleges from throughout the country currently serving online students in the state. Asking each state to regulate the institutions headquartered in their state regardless of where they serve students is a much more reasonable solution. Put another way, SARA increases the amount of regulatory oversight of distance education, but does it in a manner more relevant to today’s economy.
To be fair, New York has been aggressive in pursuing bad actors in the for-profit education sector, as evidenced by its $10.25 million settlement with Career Education Corporation. It is worth noting, however, that the lawsuit was largely based on brick-and-mortar schools that have nothing to do with SARA. In addition, this action was brought by the New York attorney general’s office and was not the result of education-based regulation. There is a relevant section in the SARA policy stating that nothing precludes “a state from using its laws of general application to pursue action against an institution that violates those laws” and another stating that “nothing precludes the state in which the complaining person is located from also working to resolve the complaint.”
The reality of SARA hardly qualifies as “ceding the ability to guard its citizens against abusive practices,” as a Century Foundation letter objecting to New York signing the SARA agreement claims.
What would be lost if New York were not to sign the SARA agreement? There is certainly a downside for institutions offering distance education courses and programs for out-of-state students. It might surprise readers of the letter, but fully 70 percent of students who take all of their courses at a distance do so from public and nonprofit institutions. Institutions like Empire State College, a longtime leader in distance education that is part of the SUNY system. Furthermore, the large for-profit institutions referenced in the article have the budget and history of obtaining state-by-state approval already. It is the smaller-profile nonprofits that have the most difficulty in obtaining authorization to serve students in different states.
A reciprocity agreement between Massachusetts and Connecticut is cited as an alternative. As best we can tell, it allows each state to continue using its own current regulations. This is not reciprocity and does not improve the consumer protection landscape for students or institutions.
Were New York to avoid signing the agreement, students who live in the state would end up with fewer choices, primarily from fewer nonprofit institutions that can operate there. Under SARA, New York students actually would have more consumer protection than currently exists as well as regulatory support for any complaint process, including from in-state agencies. Additionally, states systematically working in concert through SARA will more quickly find and deal with institutions that treat students poorly. This is far better than hypothetical, unfunded regulatory oversight by New York trying to operate independently from any other state.
New York has the opportunity to sign an agreement that would expand the regulatory oversight of distance education programs, would leave the state with the same ability to go after bad actors as they have done in the past and would increase choices for resident students -- particularly working adults -- seeking to get a valuable degree that is only enabled by distance education. It would be a mistake to let a complaint based on hypotheticals and misrepresentations of reality derail this progress.
Phil Hill is co-publisher of the e-Literate blog, co-producer of e-Literate TV and partner at MindWires Consulting. Russ Poulin is director of policy and analysis at WCET (WICHE Cooperative for Educational Technologies), which is a division of the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.