BYU-Idaho Fires Adjunct for Pro-LGBT Post

Brigham Young University, Idaho, terminated an adjunct professor of political science after she criticized the position the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints holds on same-sex relationships on her Facebook page, then refused to remove the post, according to KUTV. Ruthie Robertson was reportedly allowed to finish teaching her summer course but saw her contracted classes for the fall and winter semesters canceled after administrators were alerted to a post on her private Facebook page about LGBT pride month.

“I’m currently a member of the LDS Church,” Robertson wrote in the June post, which accused the Mormon church and others faith groups of selectively following portions of the Old Testament. “This organization has openly and forcefully opposed same-sex relationships and legalized same-sex marriage.” Yet church history, she wrote, “shows that the church has rescinded policies before that weren't doctrinal, and that weren't inspired by the Lord. I hope that this will someday apply to the stance on the LGBT community. I will always and forever stand up for the equality of the LGBT community.”

Robertson said she wrote the post to express support for her LGBT friends, and did not think it would compromise her job because she is not friends with any students online. Yet she was called to campus to talk about the post within hours of sharing it, she said. Robertson said it was “implied” that removing the post might save her position, but she said she could not do it. Instead, she posted an update saying she was speaking for herself only, and that her personal views had no place in the classroom. The university told KUTV that it does not comment on personnel matters.

Ad keywords: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

How to integrate millennials into higher ed administration (essay)

For the last 15 years, researchers have been trying to understand millennials -- people born between the early 1980s and the early 2000s -- and their potential impacts on higher education institutions. Yet despite the wealth of accumulated knowledge, colleges still seem to have problems integrating younger people into the culture of higher education administration.

For millennials, educational institutions are considered among the least innovative and satisfying places to work, according to an article by Dian Schaffhauser in The Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology. That is particularly alarming for institutions of higher learning since, as boomer-generation administrators start to retire, upper administration and leadership turnover is predicted to hit record numbers. The U.S. Department of Education also projects enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions will increase 14 percent from 2013 to 2024, suggesting not only a high replacement demand from a millennial work force but also a need for their increased participation. In other words, as people in leadership positions start to leave higher education, it will be increasingly important to take measures to ensure that the best and brightest of Generation Y stick around.

Unfortunately, that is anything but guaranteed. In a survey of 600 millennials, as many as 61 percent complained of a lack of pathways to productive outcomes from innovative ideas. Schaffhauser’s article also noted that higher education has fairly low appeal among millennial workers due to perceived inflexible and outdated administrative practices regarding collaboration, brainstorming and incorporating innovative ideas into institutional policy. Moreover, millennials address those perceived deficiencies in ways that run counter to those from their nonmillennial colleagues and superiors. They can be brash, and they tend to ignore long-established institutional hierarchies when they make their opinions known -- such as voicing policy and procedural concerns when their boss’s boss is present. That can create feelings of disrespect among nonmillennial administrators and ultimately cause rifts.

Millennials also have distinct views about institutional hierarchy and politics. They value communication and collaboration, as well as individual empowerment. Likewise, they communicate in real time -- they text, tweet and make use of budding communication platforms more than any other generation -- and value continuing conversations over sporadic email streams and sparse evaluations.

Millennials also want to contribute meaningfully to their institutions, and so they try to interject themselves into important conversations with anyone who will engage. Unfortunately, that can look like entitlement and even hubris in institutions like colleges and universities that value strong hierarchies and seniority.

In addition, balance and overall well-being are important to millennial workers. That includes physical, mental and emotional well-being, as well as balance between work and personal life, as Micah Solomon wrote in Forbes. For them, innovation is not limited to the practices and procedures that lead to the achievement of specific goals but also extends to factors that influence employee morale -- including schedules, project loads and day-to-day operations.

Finally, millennials are idealistic. They work to develop their strengths as professionals and to contribute to the overall purpose of an institution. Where nonmillennials may have been more concerned about compensation, millennials are more concerned about institutional mission, vision and culture. This means that, to them, more is at stake when an institution is not maximizing its effectiveness in its efforts to reach its goals. That is not to say that nonmillennials are not concerned with institutional purpose and vision; rather, it just says that millennials have made this their No. 1 priority, despite institutional politics, and in ways that nonmillennials traditionally have not.

Overcoming Barriers

Fortunately, established upper-level administrators can use a number of strategies to address the aforementioned barriers and challenges. First, they can communicate their feelings about institutional practices and clarify why things are done a certain way. Millennials want coaches and mentors, not bosses, as Jim Clifton, chairman and CEO of Gallup, has written. They want to feel like they are involved in a dialogue with someone who is invested in their professional growth. Millennials also want to know that their superiors value their input and that it’s OK to ask questions about institutional procedures.

Second, understand that, to millennials, the job is life. Not only should they be integrated into office culture, but they should be given some stake in it as well. They should be encouraged as agents of change and not treated just as grunt workers fulfilling daily tasks. Likewise, they should be encouraged to critically examine how their office functions in ways that enhance its ability to achieve goals and contribute to an overall institutional vision. This kind of encouragement can foster such employees’ ties with the institution -- ties that are deeply meaningful and can balance the more mundane but necessary daily tasks.

Most important, do not tell millennials, “We can’t do that.” They come from a world where change is inevitable, if not highly encouraged. Just within higher education, millennials have seen changes that only a decade or two ago would have been perceived as ludicrous and near impossible: the positive impact of online resources on student access; software applications facilitating the collection and use of institutional data on unprecedented levels; the conducting of communications using mass student relations management strategies. Even more low-tech innovations -- block plans and flexible academic calendars -- are now significantly impacting higher education institutions.

In fact, innovation and change should be seen as the norm. Not only do millennials realize this, but they understand that the tools to make it happen are well within reach. (Go to any higher education administration conference and see the number of vendors introducing new platforms for every possible issue, spanning from mass course registration to forms processing.) That is why they become cynical when new ideas are dismissed outright. However, millennials aren’t stupid. They know about budget constraints and institutional priorities. All they ask is that their ideas be given a fair and sincere hearing.

To be clear, cultural integration for millennial workers is not a one-way street. Millennials can do a lot themselves to help with their integration. First, they can understand that many people have previously occupied the space into which they are stepping and that even outdated practices were successful at one point. Second, they can practice the kind of empathy that they are asking of their nonmillennial superiors. Change is difficult -- especially for institutions of higher learning -- and buy-in from experienced administrators is better earned with an understanding of where they have been as opposed to just a vision of where millennials want to go.

Ultimately, all of higher education will soon face the problem of record turnover and increased enrollment. We need to be able to count on millennials to fill the leadership gaps, but we cannot take their long-term participation for granted. If we want the best and brightest, we must be better facilitators of their integration into our campus’s administrative cultures.

James Wicks is a doctoral student of higher education and the associate director of recruitment and school relations at Texas A&M International University.

Image Source: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

OER Webcast


Inside Digital Learning: Video Games -- Educational or Just Fun?

In this week’s “Inside Digital Learning”:

Editorial Tags: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Email Teaser: 
Inside Digital Learning: Video Games -- Educational or Just Fun?
Smart Title: 
Inside Digital Learning -- July 19, 2017, newsletter

Think Tank Aims to Assess College Outcomes

A new report from Third Way, a centrist think tank, attempts to measure higher education's performance across sectors and types of institutions. The group used federal data on completion, students' earnings six years after enrollment and loan repayment rates. The report features aggregate figures for four-year institutions, community colleges and certificate-granting institutions, with breakouts by sector.

Findings from the report include:

  • At 85 percent of four-year institutions, at least half of students who used federal aid were able to earn more than the typical high school graduate six years after enrollment. However, at 222 four-year colleges, the majority of students earned less than high school graduates.
  • At 59 percent of community colleges, most students are earning less than $25,000 per year six years after first enrolling.
  • At roughly a quarter of four-year institutions, more than half of students fail to begin repaying their loans three years after attending college.
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Report: Students Prefer College App's Academic Features

A report by DubLabs, a provider of personalized campus mobile applications, said that a majority of the students the company surveyed use their campus mobile app to stay on top of assignments, and that learners preferred the app's academic features over its social elements. When asked to rate the importance of each feature, respondents cited:

Student Debt May Be Reducing Home Ownership

A new study from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that rising student debt levels are a substantial contributor to the decline in home ownership among young Americans.

Annual public college tuition on average rose $3,843, or 81 percent, between 2001 and 2009, according to the study. Rising tuition in turn accounted for $1,628 of the increase in average student debt per capita among 24-year-olds during that time period.

The report found that increasing student debt and tuition "can explain between 11 and 35 percent of the observed approximate eight-percentage-point decline in home ownership for 28- to 30-year-olds over 2007-15."

The New York Fed in April released a study on the same topic, but with a different outcome.

That study, which looked at somewhat older cohorts, found that people's level of education is a bigger predictor of home ownership than student debt. Home ownership rates are higher among college graduates and those who have pursued credentials beyond an associate degree, according to the research, regardless of how much debt they took on.

Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Shuttered Military College Can't Pay Faculty

Wentworth Military Academy and College, now defunct, reportedly can’t afford to pay its former faculty members, as it previously promised. Michael Lierman, college president, told faculty members via email in mid-May that they’d continue being paid until the end of their contracts, and the campus closed two weeks later, according to the Associated Press. But a campus caretaker emailed instructors at the end of June, saying that Wentworth doesn’t have the money to make additional salary payments now. The academy’s board hopes to liquidate campus assets and collect unpaid tuition to honor the duration of faculty contracts. An attorney for the Missouri college, which dates back to 1880, did not respond to requests for comment.

Wentworth announced it was closing in April, citing lowered enrollments, rising costs and an aging campus, the AP reported. Some 220 cadets were boarding there at the time, most of them two-year college students. Several hundred civilians also were enrolled in college courses there. The Higher Learning Commission placed Wentworth on ongoing probation in 2015 over concerns about finances and resources to support academic programs.

Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Pennsylvania University System Chancellor to Retire

The chancellor of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education plans to retire at the beginning of September after just under four years in the position.

Frank T. Brogan, 63, is retiring Sept. 1, the state system said Monday. The announcement comes less than a week after a consultant’s report called for major changes to the leadership structure at Pennsylvania’s state system, which is made up of 14 universities and is faced with growing enrollment and financial pressures.

Last year, Brogan and the state system’s Board of Governors began an independent review process that led to the consultant’s report. But the report did not prompt the chancellor’s retirement, system officials said. Brogan told the Board of Governors of his plans to retire shortly before they met last week and heard the report’s findings for the first time.

In his retirement announcement, Brogan called the review “perhaps the most important effort” the system has undertaken. “This is the system’s opportunity to make bold choices that will ensure our universities are here to meet the needs of our current and future students and the commonwealth for decades to come, and beyond,” he said in a statement.

Cynthia D. Shapira, the chair of the Board of Governors, said in a statement that Brogan has prompted a discussion about the need to do things differently at the system, which enrolls more than 100,000 students at its universities. “Because of his leadership, we are better positioned to make important decisions about the future of our system,” she said.

Brogan will be the shortest-tenured chancellor in PASSHE’s 34-year history when he retires. The Board of Governors has yet to announce a timeline for naming interim and full-time successors.

The consultant’s report, presented in summary last week, also included recommendations such as changes at the state level to better coordinate higher education policy across different entities -- PASSHE does not include state-related universities like Pennsylvania State University. The report also called for realigning system universities to share more resources and for reaching better collective bargaining agreements. A full version of the report is expected to be released Friday.

The state system was hit by a three-day faculty strike in October before it reached an agreement with the Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties. The leader of that union said Monday that it wants to work with the university system as it changes chancellors. “Leadership changes often provide opportunities for constructive changes,” said Kenneth M. Mash, president of APSCUF, in a statement.

Brogan was previously chancellor of the State University System of Florida and president of Florida Atlantic University. He has also been Florida’s lieutenant governor and secretary of education.

Ad keywords: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Faculty members who have been lead critics of administration lose jobs at Sierra Nevada

Smart Title: 

Six full-time professors -- including leaders of efforts to question administration -- lose jobs.


Subscribe to RSS - administrators
Back to Top