Philosophy journal apologizes for symposium on Black Lives Matter written without black people


Political philosophy journal, subject of two scathing open letters, apologizes for lack of black authors.

LGBTQ group causes friction on Samford campus


Though a new pro-LGBTQ group on Samford University’s campus has been approved by both students and faculty, it has roiled Alabama Baptists.

Government policies could thwart the progress of Latinos and the country (essay)

In recent years, Latinos have made significant gains in education. For example, they are now graduating from high school at higher rates, and their dropout rates are lower than ever before. Moreover, Latinos are enrolling in higher education in record numbers -- surpassing their white and African-American counterparts.

Through a mix of policies and substantive initiatives, President Obama spurred forward the improvement of Latino education. During his eight years in office, he focused his efforts on areas that are often cited as having the most potential to improve Latino education, such as developing standards that helped ensure Latinos are ready for college and career, ending bullying in schools and communities, closing for-profit institutions that prey on vulnerable students, and providing college graduates relief from the burden of student loans.

Under the Trump administration, however, all of this progress toward improving the educational and career outcomes of Latino students is in danger of stalling and -- much worse -- reverting back to the disastrous educational attainment rates of the 1970s.

Here is just some of what is at stake.

Federal student aid. The previous administration made substantial contributions to bolster the federal student aid system. Pell Grants -- the signature federal aid program -- provided increased access to higher education for millions of Latino and low-income students across the country. In addition, the Obama administration worked to ease the burden of student loans through initiatives that reward students for their commitment to public service. President Trump’s recent actions have put these advancements in jeopardy through proposed reductions in federal student aid and the reversal of protections for student borrowers.

The 2018 budget proposal that the Trump administration released this week calls for the elimination of the Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program -- the recipients of which are usually Pell-eligible students -- and cuts the Federal Work-Study program by nearly half. Such measures could significantly restrict access to education for Latinos and other low-income and minority students.

DACA and DAPA. In June 2012, Obama signed an executive order on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which provides immigrant youth relief from deportation and an opportunity to secure employment. In November 2014, he also announced Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, intended to provide older immigrants the opportunity to earn a work permit and stay in the United States for up to three years. Both of these programs have the opportunity to impact the lives of millions of immigrants. To date, Trump has not canceled either of these programs but has spoken of potential abuses to DACA and appeared conflicted about it. Uncertainty looms over what will happen in the coming months, leaving students to fear what the future holds.

Campus climate. During his time in office, Obama worked diligently to end bullying and make sure that students felt safe in their schools and communities. Through those efforts, he raised the profile of this long-standing issue and initiated long-term solutions.

Since the last election, however, K-12 schools across the country have reported incidents that threaten the well-being of students. For example, in a Texas high school, students chanted “build the wall” during a volleyball match. And in many schools, there is continuing fear and anxiety among Latino children and racial and ethnic tensions. The consequences can be serious: research indicates that bullying negatively impacts educational attainment and is often linked to lower school achievement.

On college campuses across the country, many undergraduates are feeling a similar sense of fear and have been victims of similar incidents. Research indicates that women, low-income and minority students often face a chilly climate -- one filled with microaggressions and other psychologically damaging racist and sexist acts. In recent years, scholars and practitioners have worked to shed light on those acts and improve the situation for all students. But numerous acts of discrimination have continued to erupt over the past months on campuses across the country. Against this divisive backdrop, how will we ensure that all students feel safe and supported so that they can then thrive in and out of the classroom?

For-profit institutions. One of the key features of Obama’s higher education legacy is his enduring work to crack down on for-profit institutions. Such institutions are notorious for aggressively recruiting low-income, minority and otherwise vulnerable students without providing the appropriate supports to ensure their success. Under the new administration, it is highly likely that for-profit institutions will again return to prominence -- Trump’s secretary of education, Betsy DeVos, has close ties to the for-profit industry and has hinted at rolling back regulations for the industry. That will, in turn risk the futures of millions of Latinos, low-income students and veterans. If that were to happen, how will we ensure that such vulnerable student populations are gainfully employed upon completing their degrees?

All the policies that I’ve described will have implications not only for Latinos but also for our nation as a whole. Latinos are the fastest-growing population in the country as well as the youngest. If we do not stand up and ensure that Latinos have the educational supports and resources necessary to succeed, what will our country look like in the coming decades? We will not be “making America great again.” We will be taking our country backward to the late 1940s and 1950s, when marginalized groups were fighting for basic rights -- like access to an education.

University administrators and policy makers all have a role to play in ensuring that that Latino students feel supported during these difficult times. Institutional leaders can establish campuswide initiatives such as dialogues on diversity to ensure that all students feel comfortable and supported as they pursue their education. They can also provide direct support to students through safe spaces and diversity training so that more students can expand their view of the world and the importance of different viewpoints. And policy makers can and should advocate for effective policies that will support Latino students throughout K-12 and postsecondary education. Through such efforts, we will be able to improve Latino higher education in the United States and ultimately improve the future of our nation.

Amilcar Guzman is a third-year doctoral student in in higher education at the University of Maryland at College Park, where he studies the postsecondary outcomes of Latino college graduates. He is also the national president of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Alumni Association. He can be reached via email at amilguzman@gmail.com or on Twitter at @AmilcarGuzman1.

Image Source: 
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Newsletter Order: 
Diversity Newsletter publication date: 
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Popular Native American studies scholar declines deanship at Dartmouth amid concerns over his past support for Israel boycott

Popular Native American studies scholar who was named faculty dean at Dartmouth withdraws from position, following criticism of his past support for Israel boycott. Some fear impact on academic freedom.

Effects of Female Mentors on Women in Engineering

Nilanjana Dasgupta, a professor of psychology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, made headlines in 2105 for her study suggesting that female undergraduates in engineering were much more likely to participate in problem-solving group activities when they made up more than half the group. Dasgupta and Tara Dennehy, a graduate student in social psychology UMass-Amherst, have new study out this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that could help engineering programs further support women.

For the paper, “Female Peer Mentors Early in College Increase Women's Positive Academic experiences and Retention in Engineering,” the authors had 150 female engineering students meet with peer female or male mentors, or no mentors at all, once a month for a year. Students’ experiences were surveyed three times in the first year and once again a year later. Survey responses and retention data showed that female mentors positively influenced mentees’ retention, as well as their feelings of confidence, motivation and belonging and desire to continue in engineering as a career. Male mentors had no such effect. 

Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Dozens walk out at Notre Dame to protest Pence, who criticizes political correctness

Dozens walk out on his commencement speech. Vice president attacks “noxious wave” he sees in higher education.

Iowa Will Pay $6.5 Million to Settle 2 Bias Suits

The University of Iowa has agreed to pay $6.5 million to a former athletics administrator and a former coach, both women who said they were forced out of their jobs in ways that reflected sexism and anti-gay bias, The Gazette reported. The women are both lesbians and are partners. The agreement follows a jury award of $1.4 million to the administrator, Jane Meyer -- an award that could have grown in additional court hearings. Experts said the verdict points to widespread discrimination faced by women in athletics administration.

Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 

Yale dean whose Yelp reviews led to uproar is now on leave


What started as a controversy about two posts escalated as more of her comments materialized.

U of Illinois calls off James Watson lecture over his racist comments


U of Illinois research institute agreed to host James Watson. But it called off the event after faculty members cited his comments on race, intelligence and geography.

Democrats Introduce Bill to Bolster Pell Grants

Democrats in the House and Senate introduced new legislation Tuesday that would permanently index the value of the grant to inflation, while making funding for the program mandatory and expanding or reinstating access for a number of student groups.

Senators Mazie K. Hirono of Hawaii and Patty Murray of Washington and Representatives Susan Davis of California and Bobby Scott of Virginia introduced the bill, the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act. Murray and Scott are the ranking Democrats on their chambers' respective education committees.

The senators say the Pell Grant would remain fixed at the current maximum of $5,920 in fiscal year 2018 without additional fixes, eroding the value of the grant. And they say making funding for the program mandatory, rather than discretionary, would protect it from cuts during spikes in demand. The bill would also extend access to Pell Grants to "high-quality, short-term" job-training programs, raise the income threshold for the grant, and increase lifetime eligibility to 14 semesters. It also would reinstate or expand access for defrauded students who make successful borrower-defense claims, Dreamers, incarcerated students and students with drug-related convictions.

While Pell Grants have received bipartisan support -- evidenced by the reinstatement of year-round Pell in the 2017 omnibus funding package -- the bill will likely struggle to get Republican support. It's part of a higher ed campaign House Democrats announced Monday focused on access, affordability and completion.

Democrats launched a similar campaign last year -- called In the Red -- that went nowhere.

Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 


Subscribe to RSS - diversity
Back to Top