• Call to Action: Marketing and Communications in Higher Education

    A space to discuss the ways in which we market and communicate about higher education and the collegiate experience.

  • College Ready Writing

    A blog about education, higher ed, teaching, and trying to re-imagine how we provide education.

  • Confessions of a Community College Dean

    In which a veteran of cultural studies seminars in the 1990s moves into academic administration and finds himself a married suburban father of two. Foucault, plus lawn care.

  • Digital Tweed

    Digital Tweed® is the work of Kenneth C. Green, founding director of The Campus Computing Project. If successful, these posts will inform and entertain, and at times also annoy. A little dissonance can be a good thing.

  • Getting to Green

    An administrator pushes, on a shoestring budget, to move his university and the world toward a more sustainable equilibrium.

  • GlobalHigherEd

    Surveying the Construction of Global Knowledge/Spaces for the ‘Knowledge Economy’

  • GradHacker

    A Blog from GradHacker and MATRIX: The Center for Humane Arts, Letters and Social Sciences Online

  • Higher Ed Gamma

    MOOCS and beyond.

  • Just Visiting

    A blog by John Warner, author of the story collection Tough Day for the Army, and a novel, The Funny Man, on teaching, writing and never knowing when you're going to be asked to leave.

  • Law, Policy -- and IT?

    Tracy Mitrano explores the intersection where higher education, the Internet and the world meet (and sometimes collide).

  • Library Babel Fish

    A college librarian's take on technology

  • Mama PhD

    Mothers attempting to balance parenthood and academics.

  • Prose and Purpose

    After 25 years on the job, a former provost examines the world on campus and in higher ed.

  • Sounding Board

    Analysis and advice on questions and issues of individual ethics and institutional integrity, from Jane Robbins.

    Do you have a question or comment that you wish to make anonymously?

    Click here to send it to me.

  • StratEDgy

    The StratEDgy blog is intended to be a thoughtful hub for discussion about strategy and competition in higher education.

  • Student Affairs and Technology

    News, tips, and practical insights about technology for student affairs practitioners by Eric Stoller.

  • Technology and Learning

    A space for conversation and debate about learning and technology

  • The Education of Oronte Churm

    Oronte Churm is the pen name of John Griswold, who teaches in the MFA program at McNeese State University, proudly nestled in Cajun country on the Louisiana Gulf.

  • The World View

    A blog from the Center for International Higher Education

  • University Diaries

    A professor of English describes American university life.

  • University of Venus

    GenX Women in Higher Ed, Writing from Across the Globe


First Classes

After a day of advising, my first class in “Energy and the Environment,” teaching the first class in my own course, “Classical Political Thought,” and doing some laundry, I was wrecked, so I didn’t write last night. Instead, I went to bed where I tossed and turned for a couple of hours while composing this blog post in my head until I drifted off to sleep vigorously forgetting all I planned for this blog post.

January 20, 2010

After a day of advising, my first class in “Energy and the Environment,” teaching the first class in my own course, “Classical Political Thought,” and doing some laundry, I was wrecked, so I didn’t write last night. Instead, I went to bed where I tossed and turned for a couple of hours while composing this blog post in my head until I drifted off to sleep vigorously forgetting all I planned for this blog post.

Over all, yesterday went well, in his class, Trace Jordan was clear, well-organized, and gently humorous. Then, in the evening, I began teaching my own class and that, I think, went pretty well, too, although I’m pretty certain that if a student had been at both he would have noticed two main differences.

First, there was size and, in education at least, size matters: Energy has 120 students, Classical has 16, so my room was much smaller and even if I was inclined to use a PA system (and I’m not), I wouldn’t have needed one. Trace, on the other hand, was immersed in technological aids: in addition to a microphone, he used a DVD player (to show a clip from “60 Minutes” about the wonders of ethanol), some slides, and an overhead projector while I remained stuck in about the 18th century with no more than a blackboard to support my pedagogical efforts.

Second, while Trace used all of his allotted 75 minutes, I used less than an hour of the 2 ½ hours my class was scheduled for. I told them who I was, asked who they were, went through the syllabus, and informed them of the requirements: do the readings, participate in class, write cogent papers about the philosophers in question, and, of course, my standard spiel on grading, “There is no correct answer, just answers that are well-argued, and that deal seriously with the texts.”

I also offered, and meant it, my standard statement on interpretation: “I don’t care whether you agree with me or not, I care that you offer good arguments for your position!” (This statement is, of course, never believed by students who don’t get good grades; such students remain firmly convinced, probably because it’s a more comforting thought, that their grade was ideologically based). I concluded with a brief introduction to the pre-Socratics, but I didn’t use all the time for the simple reason that they haven’t yet read anything.

There were also certain similarities, despite the radical difference in subject matter. As one would expect, we both assigned readings for the next class, he the first 21 pages of CIC, me “the Symposium,” and neither of us told the students how to read the text. He probably didn’t because he figured that most of the students (except perhaps your correspondent) know how to read something like “Chemistry in Context,” I didn’t because I was equally certain that my students don’t know how to read something like “the Symposium.”

When I say they don’t know how to read a Platonic dialogue, I don’t mean that they are illiterate (although, alas, I have encountered that), I mean that they’re probably not capable of understanding the rhythm of something like the Symposium, of understanding its structure and the way the different interlocutors definitions of love interact with one another. I expect that next week (my class meets once a week, Trace’s twice), the students will tell me that they couldn’t make sense of it, and I will try, and succeed with most of them, to get them to see how a dialogue works so that when we move on to Plato’s other dialogues they will not be wholly lost.

The other thing the courses had in common, and this was supremely gratifying to me, was that, in this science course at least, there didn’t seem to be one right answer. Consider that clip from “60 Minutes,” in it Dan Rather wandered around Iowa, where he talked to farmers who now grow corn for their very own ethanol plant, Berkeley, where he spoke to a scientist, and to an unnamed, book-lined room where he spoke to a shill for the oil companies who, hold the front page, thought that ethanol was a really lousy idea for America’s energy needs. The clip was from 2006 when gasoline was expensive, but now, with gas much cheaper and the problem with ethanol more apparent (you need land to grow corn, or sugar cane which the Brazilians use, and if you’re growing that, you’re not growing something else, and if you’re not growing something else, particularly food, then there will be all sorts of consequences and none of them will be good) it seems decidedly less wise.

After the video, he broke the class into small groups (I was with two young women who must have had one question on their minds: “Who’s the old fart?”) and told to come up with two advantages, two disadvantages, and two questions about the U.S. investing heavily in ethanol. Our advantages were, as Trace rightly pointed out, as much about geo-politics (reduction of dependence on foreign oil for example) as about science. When he said this, I remember thinking, “Great, all I have to do is find a way to keep the course on the geopolitical level I’ll be fine,” but I’m sure that pp 1-22 of “Chemistry in Context” will quickly dash that dream.


Back to Top