In which a veteran of cultural studies seminars in the 1990s moves into academic administration and finds himself a married suburban father of two. Foucault, plus lawn care.
A new correspondent writes:
I'm a postdoc at a big research university. We have a confluence of events at our University which could really lead to something really great happening, but no one seems much interested, and it would
frustrate me to no end if the opportunity is missed. So I'd like to know -- what's the best way to pitch a new idea to a new Dean?
Without spending a single dollar, our University is in the process of having a large supercomputing center plopped down right in the middle of it, and in fact the necessary flow of money will be adminstered by
the University.This was arranged from start to finish by a small number of fiefdoms, who quite reasonably feel very possessive about it, and who control most of the new center and are gearing up and ready to use this fantastic resource once it comes online.
As things stand now, this enormous resource will ensure that the members of the founding fiefdoms do exactly what they have already been doing, but bigger and better. And that is surely all to the good; but if this is *all* that happens, it's an enormous missed opportunity. This could be a boon to the entire University if handled properly - if expertise were shared, both among the fiefdoms and to other groups within the school who currently aren't huge users of supercomputing for their research. It could become a catalyst for bringing together interdisciplinary work - first by sharing techniques amongst researchers, then by sharing courses (why should every department have to teach its graduate students their own separate computational techniques classes?), and hopefully bringing people across departmental divides to work on problems of overlapping interests once people realize they're approaching similar problems. It could improve connections with researchers within the same city and with some access to this resource but outside the walls of the University.
But there's currently not much motivation for anyone to follow this path. The members of the small group of founding fiefs don't have much incentive to encourage other groups to use the resource, and
other departments don't seem to be chomping at the bit - partly because they're almost completely out of the loop as to what's going on. Even once they start realizing how to use this new resource on their own, again it'll just be the same groups doing exactly the same thing as before but scaled up. Not a disaster, but not what could be.
Given that the resource exists, it seems like encouraging its use and using its existence to encourage interdepartmental collaboration through a campus-wide `computational science' program could be done
without spending a lot of dollars - it's not clear new faculty lines necessarily need to be created, for instance. The founding areas are already ensuring that new hires are made with this new resource in
mind (at least one such person is already hired). It's `just' a matter of setting up institutional incentives for these new people to talk to each other, and to find people in corners of other departments willing to start using this resource for their own work.
The other part of this equation is that we have a brand new Dean -- a very gifted administrator and one who has already successfully shepherded collective projects across multiple administrative units, but one whose background is such that the appeal of a campus wide push for interdisciplinary computational science might not be self-evident.
I want to make sure that the new Dean knows (with lots of examples) what could be with some administrative support. I know that everyone on campus has their own Great Ideas for the school and there may well be important reasons why this particular one may not work or can't be a priority now, but I want to make sure that it at least gets real consideration. So what's the best way to do this?
There's a lot here. I'll start with the obvious.
In the short term, the political battles you're asking the new Dean to pick are substantial, and the payoff pretty theoretical. That's a tough sell. (This is especially true if the new Dean isn't a subject matter expert in this area. I've been in situations when I was pretty sure that faculty in a particular area were trying to exploit their greater expertise to paint a pet project as a mortal necessity. Go through that a few times, and the skepticism starts to come easy.) From this side of the desk, it looks like you're asking someone to do all the political dirty work for you, in service of your pet idea. Your pet idea may or may not be great – I have no way of knowing, and neither does he – but the dirty work is clearly difficult.
My suggestion would be to come at the Dean indirectly. Instead of just marching into his office with an idea and a plea, start by doing some of the political groundwork yourself. Flesh out some of the benefits of your pet idea, then target some of the faculty to whom those benefits would be the most attractive. In other words, gain allies. If you can do that in multiple fiefdoms, all the better. This will involve some basic shoe-leather diplomacy, as well as considerable patience and listening skills. It's not something that a few tossed-off emails will achieve.
That said, though, the upside is considerable. For one, you may learn from your prospective recruits that there are real obstacles of which you're currently unaware. Those obstacles may come from the rules set by whomever's paying for the thing, or from logistics, or from technological limits, or weird policy intersections, or departmental budgeting, or just about anything else. By finding out what those are, you will be able to develop work-arounds, or to know what work-arounds to ask to have constructed, or you may decide it simply can't be done in your current context. But whatever happens, you won't leave yourself vulnerable to devastating blindside attacks.
In addition to strengthening the merits of your proposal, you'll also be able – if you play your cards right and catch a break or two – to get around the objection that it's Your Idea. (This works particularly well if you're open to amendments.) The way this usually plays out in campus politics is that the proposal is reduced to the affiliation of the person proposing it. "Oh, that came from X department. We know what they're really up to." If you have interdepartmental allies, that argument is much harder to sustain.
(If someone gets wind of what you're doing and raises an objection, ask to be recognized as a committee. Deaning 101 suggests that when confronted with conflict, the first and easiest path is to appoint a committee. You'll be pushing an open door.)
When you have interdepartmental sponsorship and an inherently stronger proposal, you'll have a much more compelling argument to take to the new Dean. Theoretical appeals are fine, but theoretical appeals that also have faculty champions across departments, and that have already been vetted for their practicality, are so much better.
The other thing I'd do is be prepared to achieve success gradually, rather than all at once. "Pilot project" can be a magic phrase, when properly deployed. The great virtue of presenting an idea as a pilot project is that it's much harder to argue against an experiment than against a wholesale change. If you can create enough of an opening to at least generate some of your proposed payoff on a pilot basis, then you can argue from actual success. Nothing succeeds like success, especially when that success has faculty champions from multiple areas at once. At that point, the momentum will be considerable, and the Dean will be both more sympathetic and better positioned to do something about it. (Insider Tip: we administrators get all excited whenever someone builds "outcomes assessment" into the design of the pilot. In other words, when pitching the pilot, tell us how you'd define and measure success. It takes a little more time upfront, but being able to say "we met or exceeded our expectations in key areas" gives you major credibility.) A pilot project that succeeded on its own terms becomes an incredibly powerful argument for a larger project.
Of course, you can also try the traditional and time-honored methods of brown-nosing, currying favor, etc. I have to admit that those sometimes work, depending on context, but they're pretty much independent of the merits of the proposal. The approach I'm suggesting could actually strengthen the merits of your proposal in demonstrable ways, such that you wouldn't have to worry overmuch about the usual political crap. Try the high road first; the low road will always be there anyway.
Wise and worldly readers – any thoughts?
Have a question? Ask the Administrator at deandad (at) gmail (dot) com.