• Call to Action: Marketing and Communications in Higher Education

    A space to discuss the ways in which we market and communicate about higher education and the collegiate experience.

  • College Ready Writing

    A blog about education, higher ed, teaching, and trying to re-imagine how we provide education.

  • Confessions of a Community College Dean

    In which a veteran of cultural studies seminars in the 1990s moves into academic administration and finds himself a married suburban father of two. Foucault, plus lawn care.

  • Digital Tweed

    Digital Tweed® is the work of Kenneth C. Green, founding director of The Campus Computing Project. If successful, these posts will inform and entertain, and at times also annoy. A little dissonance can be a good thing.

  • Getting to Green

    An administrator pushes, on a shoestring budget, to move his university and the world toward a more sustainable equilibrium.

  • GlobalHigherEd

    Surveying the Construction of Global Knowledge/Spaces for the ‘Knowledge Economy’

  • GradHacker

    A Blog from GradHacker and MATRIX: The Center for Humane Arts, Letters and Social Sciences Online

  • Higher Ed Gamma

    MOOCS and beyond.

  • Just Visiting

    A blog by John Warner, author of the story collection Tough Day for the Army, and a novel, The Funny Man, on teaching, writing and never knowing when you're going to be asked to leave.

  • Law, Policy -- and IT?

    Tracy Mitrano explores the intersection where higher education, the Internet and the world meet (and sometimes collide).

  • Library Babel Fish

    A college librarian's take on technology

  • Mama PhD

    Mothers attempting to balance parenthood and academics.

  • Prose and Purpose

    After 25 years on the job, a former provost examines the world on campus and in higher ed.

  • Rethinking Research

    How scholars and researchers are working to restore confidence in peer-reviewed science.

  • Sounding Board

    Analysis and advice on questions and issues of individual ethics and institutional integrity, from Jane Robbins.

    Do you have a question or comment that you wish to make anonymously?

    Click here to send it to me.

  • StratEDgy

    The StratEDgy blog is intended to be a thoughtful hub for discussion about strategy and competition in higher education.

  • Student Affairs and Technology

    News, tips, and practical insights about technology for student affairs practitioners by Eric Stoller.

  • Technology and Learning

    A space for conversation and debate about learning and technology

  • The Education of Oronte Churm

    Oronte Churm is the pen name of John Griswold, who teaches in the MFA program at McNeese State University, proudly nestled in Cajun country on the Louisiana Gulf.

  • The World View

    A blog from the Center for International Higher Education

  • University Diaries

    A professor of English describes American university life.

  • University of Venus

    GenX Women in Higher Ed, Writing from Across the Globe


FUNQs: Won't Ask, Won't Tell

Today I have the urge to address a perennial, insidious, and unnecessary condition that afflicts higher education in this country. It results from the most Frequently UNasked Question (by students) that is also the most Frequently UNanswered Question (by faculty): What is a primary source?

November 1, 2009

Today I have the urge to address a perennial, insidious, and unnecessary condition that afflicts higher education in this country. It results from the most Frequently UNasked Question (by students) that is also the most Frequently UNanswered Question (by faculty): What is a primary source?

The silence surrounding this question is deafening. Undergrads are oblivious to the issue, think they already know the answer because they memorized a definition in eighth grade (“A primary source was written at the time”), or are afraid to show their ignorance by asking in class or in private communication with a professor. Faculty are far more culpable, in my view, because they assume, based on no evidence whatsoever, that students have grasped the difference between primary and secondary sources at about the same time, and with the same clarity, that they figured out sex.

Au contraire: what with tidy textbooks, packaged compilations of readings — or worse yet, summaries and excerpts — that mix original material with commentary, compounded by a torrent of electronic resources, students are bound to be hazy about what makes anything primary. My hunch is that the problem is at least in part visceral: no pain, no gain in this context becomes no effort (to acquire a primary source), no understanding (of what one is). My second hunch is that, lacking attention to the issue, students will confuse the container with its content. A paperback edition of Romeo and Juliet appears identical to a casebook of critical essays about the play. So if both look like a book, feel like a book, and smell like a book, and if both come from a bookstore, library shelf, or Blackboard site, then they both must be...? My third, and most troubling, hunch is that every IHE confers degrees on some students who are still uncertain about what’s what, sourcewise.

To test these suspicions, I often ask small groups of students to distinguish between primary and secondary sources. Originally I thought their answers would help me cast my own presentation of library research concepts and strategies, but I quickly realized that I was blundering into an abyss of muddle and guesswork.

Here is how the drama usually unfolds. First, there is silence and a close examination of fingernails and keypads. Then a brave soul or two will dig deep and recite a version of the memorized definition. But when I ask them to elaborate or provide an example of a primary source in the context of their course, I am apt to hear such assertions as that a primary source is (a) what they are supposed to read first, (b) the most important piece of their research, (c) the item they should list at the top of their bibliography, and (d) the earliest treatment of their topic. My favorite response of all time came from a class smart aleck who announced, “I’m not sure what a primary source is, but I figure it must be one if it makes me sneeze.” Lunacy or profundity, do you think?

While none of these notions is dead wrong, and while I applaud the attempt to use the etymology of primary as a clue, it is apparent to me that there has been a crucial gap in student learning. Boiled down, faculty reason, and teach, as follows:

--This is what we’re studying.

--This is what we know about it.

--This is what people have said about it.

--Now we’ll consider what it means and its consequences.

What’s missing from this syllogism is a careful look at what it is and at how we might either verify or extend our knowledge systematically. In short, what are the primary sources any college course is concerned with and what are the appropriate ways to engage them.

Faculty in the experimental sciences do the best job of imparting ideas about the substance of their field, along with the rigor, logic, and safety precautions good research demands. Students enroll in laboratory classes expecting to learn about phenomena by conducting guided investigations that entail precise procedures and analysis. But there is rarely an equivalent detailed look at objects or approaches in the rest of the college curriculum. Instead, there may be a research assignment requiring a preliminary bibliography or draft, with scribbled professorial feedback, and some instructions about what to do, but no coaching on how — let alone why — to do it. Repetition over four years will eventually lead students to a sort of fluency, but there’s no guarantee that students will graduate with the same mastery of methods that they have of facts and theories. To judge from the e-mail queries we get from alumni about how to find information in areas outside their major, I have to conclude that many people cannot adapt their undergraduate research experiences to different disciplines or endeavors.

Neither faculty nor librarians, acting as individuals, can impart everything students need to understand about sources or research methods, but we can, and should, talk repeatedly with students about the origin, nature, and transmission of the primary sources they are studying. We must not allow “What is a primary source?” to remain a taboo question.


Be the first to know.
Get our free daily newsletter.


Back to Top