By its very design and nature as a subscription-free publication on the Web, Inside Higher Ed embraces the small-d democracy of open access (with the occasional messiness that comes with it). But the conversation into which we invite our readers has its limits -- our editors moderate it, using their judgment -- and participation in it carries with it some responsibility.
Commenters should understand that Inside Higher Ed reviews every comment prior to publication. While this results in small delays in when comments appear, we believe these standards are important enough to warrant such a system. Inside Higher Ed reserves the right to edit comments in ways that do not alter the meaning of a comment. For example, if a reader submits a three paragraph comment, and the last paragraph contains a personal attack, Inside Higher Ed may remove that paragraph but publish the rest of the comment.
Inside Higher Ed encourages, but does not require, comments to include real names and job titles. Many readers want to know who is making a certain point. Inside Higher Ed permits anonymous posts because some subsets of our readers (adjuncts without job security, for example, or those on the job market) might otherwise feel unable to participate in our conversations.
Following are the standards to which Inside Higher Ed holds comments (and by extension commenters) on the site:
- They must not engage in libel.
- They must stick to the subject (or subjects) discussed in the article, column or blog post. A news article about a financial aid proposal put forward by Congressional Republicans does not clear the way for a derogatory comment about the GOP’s presidential candidate; a blog post about cultural studies does not invite a comment blasting affirmative action.
- They must not contain spam, commercially promotional material, or self-promotional links.
- They must not engage in personal attacks. If you disagree with an opinion expressed in an article or in another comment, feel free to respectfully challenge that opinion with a posting of your own. Commenters who engage in uncivil exchanges with others will be warned and, if the behavior continues, blocked from participating.
- If a comment makes a point that has been made repeatedly by previous commenters on that article, we may reject it.
- Comments may contain links to articles that back up their points. But commenters may not paste entire copyrighted articles into a comment.
Thank you. Welcome to the discussion.