Facilities

Campuses remove monuments and building names with legacies of racism

College leaders are reconsidering the names of campus buildings and monuments that memorialize white supremacists, in reaction to the current movement against racial injustice.

Faculty concerns about the fall are mounting

Section: 

Professors across institutions increasingly wave red flags about the private and public health implications of default face-to-face instruction come fall, along with a lack of shared decision making in staffing and teaching decisions.

SUNY Binghamton receives largest donation in its history

Binghamton University hopes to expand its national profile with a new baseball stadium paid for by an anonymous donor.

Study shows how different types of college dormitories can affect grades

A new study found that slick, apartment-style housing might be aesthetically pleasing but could lower students' grade point averages.

Job ad at U of Louisville raises questions about considering race in faculty hires

Many colleges want more ethnically and racially diverse faculty members. But should searches be limited to underrepresented groups? One university just tried.

'Interactive Learning Spaces' at the center of Ball State U.'s faculty development program

Section: 

Can active learning techniques and flexible classroom seating improve student outcomes? Research at Ball State University has produced mixed results.

Colleges should hang portraits of diverse people on their campus walls (opinion)

The corridors and lecture halls of colleges and universities and their academic medical centers are traditionally adorned with oil portraits portraying former presidents, chancellors, deans, academic department chairs, professors and other notables. Dressed in academic gowns, or in starched white laboratory coats or surgical scrub suits, they appear with their hands resting on a stack of books, a microscope or some other object used to indicate their scholarly interest. Looking wise, thoughtful and distinguished, the portraits stare down at passersby walking through hallways or students seated in lecture halls. In the vast majority of cases, the individuals portrayed are gray-haired white men.

People have raised their voices against building names and statues at higher education institutions around the country. New Jersey’s Monmouth University will remove Woodrow Wilson’s name from a campus building. Monmouth’s president referred to Wilson as “a controversial politician who never actually set foot in the current building.” Wilson, who served as U.S. president from 1913 to 1921, supported segregation in the federal government, denied admission of Black students to Princeton University when he served as that institution’s president, and commended the Ku Klux Klan.

In June of 2018, the leadership of one of Harvard Medical School’s teaching hospitals, the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, announced that 31 gold-framed portraits of former medical school department chairs would be removed from the hospital’s amphitheater and dispersed to departmental conference rooms and lobbies as part of a broader diversity initiative. Thirty of the 31 portraits are of white males.

“I have watched the faces of individuals as they have come into the amphitheater,” said Elizabeth Nabel, M.D., president of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “I have watched them look at the walls. I read on their faces, ‘Interesting, but I am not represented here.’ That got me thinking that maybe it’s time that we think about respecting our past in a different way … We need to make sure that our culture creates a sense of belonging for all.”

A year after the portraits were removed, the former dean of Harvard Medical School, Jeffrey Flier, M.D., published an op-ed in The Boston Globe criticizing the removal of the portraits. “Unlike disputed portraits and statuary related to slavery and the Civil War, these men [portrayed in the portraits] made contributions to medicine and research that stand up well to current scrutiny,” Flier wrote. “Removing all the historic amphitheater portraits -- leaving bare walls in their place for the past year -- won’t advance diversity. What might? An array of art that reflects today’s rapidly changing physician leadership, while recognizing essential but less male-dominated health-related professions, such as nursing and social work.” Flier also observed that many of his colleagues, who shared his sentiments, were afraid to speak up in defense of the portraits.

At New York Medical College, a member of the Touro College and University system, we have taken a distinctly different approach to concerns regarding portraits in our hallways and amphitheaters. NYMC was founded in 1860. When I arrived on campus in 2012, the college had 30 oil portraits of the institution’s key luminaries hanging on its walls. Twenty-nine were of white men. My judgment was the same as Flier’s: none of the distinguished physicians and scientists had done anything in their careers to warrant being removed from the walls. Rather than wring our hands about these oil portraits that might make some in our campus community feel uncomfortable or unwelcome, we promptly went about rectifying the gaps in the historical record were anyone to rely solely on the portraits as a source of information.

I am sure that most academic institutions, if they subject themselves to careful historical research, will be able to recapture a more diverse and inclusive history. No one is stopping us from augmenting the portraits on our university’s walls with other images that portray the full scope of our diverse institutional histories.

At NYMC, for example, we learned though research that New York State’s first African American female physician graduated from our college in the 1860s, as did one of the first female physicians in Canadian history. We learned about our first African American male medical school graduate in the 1880s and the creation of the scholarships specially designated for African American medical school applicants in the 1920s. Other notable African Americans in our institutional history were the first dean of a historically white-majority medical school, a pioneering female open-heart surgeon and member of the American College of Surgeons, and a decorated hero of the French military medical corps during World War I.

In the process, we discovered stories of virulent anti-Semitism directed against physicians in the first half of the 20th century and their heroic responses. We learned of pioneering female department chairs in the basic and clinical sciences in the early 20th century. We found out that our college had America’s first Nisei clinical department chair. Each of the stories was carefully researched and correlative illustrations were found. And for each one a display was hung equivalent in size to an oil portrait and side by side with our 30 existing paintings.

Removing Woodrow Wilson’s name from a university building illustrates the problem. As governor, Wilson appointed the first Jewish person to the New Jersey Supreme Court. As president, he appointed the first Jewish person to the U.S. Supreme Court. He lowered tariffs, created a graduated income tax to reform federal finances, created the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Trade Commission, signed the Clayton Antitrust Act, led America through World War I, and gave birth to the League of Nations. He was, however, a product of his upbringing in Virginia and Georgia. Was Wilson a racist? Yes. Did he accomplish great things? Yes. He was human. People are multidimensional, not one-dimensional.

Campuses that have statues in honor of Confederate generals or politicians and/or buildings named in their honor represent special cases deserving particular scrutiny. The majority of citizens believe that we should remove statues honoring people who engaged in armed insurrection against the lawful government of the U.S. and supported slavery. In dealing with those statues, we should solicit advice from historical experts who understand that judging a person of the past means looking at the big picture.

Broad-based conversations, including a role for public space utilization committees, must play a role in this debate. When such statues are removed and relocated and buildings are renamed, people of good will can create contextual descriptions to help us understand why our predecessors did what they did and how we might understand their behavior today. It is possible to create new building names, statues and monuments that more fully reflect the diversity of a higher education institution’s story.

In the same spirit, when you walk the corridors of New York Medical College and sit in our amphitheaters now, you are looked down upon by distinguished individuals in academic gowns and starched white coats. You are, however, also looked down upon by a rainbow of diversity in American higher education. Telling previously untold historical stories is, I submit, a far more fruitful way of dealing with any concerns about the portraits hanging on a college or university’s walls than removing portraits of physicians who did nothing during their lives that warrant them being removed. You don’t ignore a portion of your history. Rather, you strive to truthfully portray and contextualize all of it.

Edward C. Halperin, M.D., M.A., is chancellor and chief executive officer at New York Medical College, a member of the Touro College and University system. This essay represents his views and not those of the college.

Section: 
Editorial Tags: 
Image Source: 
Istock.com/bananahuman
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Newsletter Order: 
5
Diversity Newsletter publication date: 
Tuesday, July 7, 2020
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Email Teaser: 
Portraits of Diversity
Live Updates: 
liveupdates0

Cerritos builds first homeless student housing in California

Cerritos College has opened a 28-bed housing development for homeless students as part of an initiative to help them complete their studies and earn associate degrees.

Colleges should rethink how they will reuse their facilities this fall (opinion)

It is now probable that a national all-clear signal for the coronavirus pandemic won’t be possible until a vaccine is developed and administered broadly. That is very unlikely to occur before the opening of the fall semester on American campuses. The more hopeful and probable scenario is that new infections will level off and treatments will improve. Nevertheless, by September, a reservoir of millions of yet-uninfected Americans will probably remain, and some forms of social distancing will still be necessary.

What does that mean for higher education -- a sector of our economy composed of billions of dollars of public and private investments in campuses that are currently deserts, without students, faculty or staff? Most institutions are battling heroically to communicate online and to manage a very uncertain financial future. It will be surprising if donations will hold up in the face of an overall economic depression and erosion of personal portfolios and institutional endowments. The competition with other nonprofits for charitable giving will be fierce. Yet perhaps even more threatening will be the conversations in millions of households focused on whether students should return to campuses in the fall.

The conventional wisdom has been that enrollments increased during economic recessions, but that wisdom doesn’t factor in a wholly different medical environment. Now, many students may elect to stay home because they are afraid or because the pleasures of residential life have disappeared. They will seek to eke out their educational futures with various online providers. How they will discern what kind of educational focus will be productive in the new post-COVID economy, which is at this stage unknowable?

Few campuses should expect a return to normalcy next year, so what further adjustments will need to be made? Residential campuses will face a different set of problems than commuter schools, though many institutions are combinations. If there are considerably fewer students taking in-person courses on many campuses, what should trustees and administrators do?

In the short term, it is hard to see an alternative use for the largest buildings on many campuses, the cavernous football stadiums or basketball and hockey arenas. In an era of continued social distancing, sitting side by side with thousands of fans you do not know, or exchanging hugs with people you do know at tailgates or postgame parties, seem to be unattractive activities now. Even playing games without spectators, marching bands or cheerleaders runs risks for players and coaches, who must practice, perform and travel together. Will institutions be able to honor scholarships for athletes who cannot be on campus together?

In a national survey of 130 athletics directors, more than half foresaw revenue decreases of more than 20 percent. Even that is probably whistling in the dark. A recent Seton Hall University survey showed that 72 percent of the respondents said they would not attend resumed sporting events until a virus vaccine was available. Existing athletic conferences will have to be redesigned to eliminate travel costs; Seton Hall’s Big East Conference, for example, includes institutions in Nebraska, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. Without paying spectators, may universities will have to drop intercollegiate sports altogether or convert them to club teams or even intramurals.

In contrast, arts, music and other cultural activities may survive without in-person audiences, if they can practice and perform without close proximity. Already some musical groups have given concerts thorough Zoom. It will be difficult, but colleges and universities should make cultural events accessible to off-campus audiences, perhaps with nominal prices. If a campus has a functioning radio or television station, it might extend access and programing to community groups. Similarly, campus libraries might create new agreements with other local libraries, so their resources might be shared electronically and patrons need not travel.

If inexpensive and quick infection tests become available, it is possible to imagine that administering them daily to small groups of students at the classroom doors would be feasible. For large lecture hall classes, that probably would not work. So with fewer residential students and excess classrooms, campuses will need to find new uses for these spaces. In the short run, some campuses may follow Stanford University’s example of clearing student rooms for medical personnel and persons awaiting COVID-19 test results.

With millions of workers now unemployed, campuses will also need to think through how they can engage in on-site or online training for the new skills the changed economy will require. Some departments and faculty will be able to adopt that new very vocational mission better than others. For remaining residential students, new internships and other programs will need to be designed so that these privileged citizens can help other citizens with great needs. Students may be able to help with contact tracing, supporting health-care workers and, if safe, providing activities in nursing homes.

On residential campuses, lower enrollment will mean some empty dormitories. Simply turning off the heat, utilities and water is not civically acceptable. In an environment where many families will no longer be able to pay mortgages or afford rents, it would be irresponsible to let campus housing stay empty. Governments could create Section 8-like housing vouchers for families that would benefit from living on a campus. Rules would have to be worked out to assure nondiscrimination, family priorities and what campus facilities would be accessible to these nonstudents. Campuses should be free to negotiate some conditions in return for these vouchers within the basic legal framework.

Higher education is not as desperate as the cruise line, air transportation or hotel industries, but serious adjustments will need to be made. And some small colleges with low endowments and limited status sadly may fail, perhaps converted into senior retirement villages or corporate locations.

In the recently passed stimulus package, about $14 billion was allocated to higher education based on a formula of campus enrollment of 75 percent Pell Grant students and 25 percent non-Pell Grant students. Support for propping up largely empty campuses, however, will dissipate over time, given the enormous number of immediate needs governments must address. It will not be enough to point to the long-term benefits of higher education given the nation’s immediate health and economic crisis. Higher education will make new friends and long-term supporters if it shows it can be responsive to the crisis in a nonpartisan pragmatic repurposing of some of its facilities.

George R. La Noue is Research Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at the University of Maryland Baltimore County and author of Silenced Stages: The Loss of Academic Freedom and Campus Policy Debates.

Editorial Tags: 
Image Source: 
Istockphoto.com/BrandonJ74
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Live Updates: 
liveupdates0

Librarians advocate closing campus libraries during coronavirus pandemic

While many colleges and universities have closed their libraries, others say they can't operate without keeping them open.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Facilities
Back to Top