- Student Aid Remains a State Priority
- The Rapid Rise of Merit Aid
- New ACE report finds diversity gaps between graduates, overall students
- Keeping Connected With Iran
- Anticipating Impact of New GI Bill
- 'Roadmap' for Latino College Success
- Study shows decadelong dip in remedial coursetaking
- 'Unprecedented' 2-Year Decline for U.S. Science Funds
Documenting the Decline of (Print) Law Reviews
You don't have to look far for evidence of the decline of the print medium, as daily newspapers contract by the day, amid other signs.
But not surprisingly, perhaps, publishers are not exactly advertising their woes, and as a result, Ross E. Davies, editor in chief of The Green Bag law journal and a professor of law at George Mason University, had some difficulty when he sought to catalog the print readership of the country's leading law reviews.
In a paper prepared for The Green Bag's annual almanac and available now on the Social Science Research Network, Davies found that many law reviews were inconsistent, to be kind, in keeping up with a U.S. Postal Service requirement to publish their circulation numbers. Seven of the 15 leading journals he examined had not published their statistics for 2007-8, and several of them seemed to flout the rule consistently.
While Davies speculates about whether ignorance or something else explains the failure, he suggests that it may be better explained by what is revealed by the data he was able to collect, which show that all of the law reviews have seen significant drops -- most in the range of half to two-thirds -- in their print circulations. Harvard's law review fell to 2,610 paid subscriptions in 2007-8, down from a peak of 8,760 in 1979-80, and the University of Virginia's had dipped to 530 from 2,396 in 1980-81, as seen in the table below.
Total Paid Circulation for Law Reviews in Top 15 of 'U.S. News' Rankings
|Yale||Did not report||3,700||3,300||Did not report|
|Stanford||Did not report||Did not report||Did not report||1,008|
|Columbia||3,795||2,947||2,273||Did not report|
|New York U.||2,100||Did not report||1,362||Did not report|
|Boalt Hall (U. of Calif.)||2,549||1,990||Did not report||884|
|Chicago||2,068||Did not report||1,922||Did not report|
|Northwestern||1,771||1,264||Did not report||Did not report|
|Virginia||Did not report||2,029||1,536||530|
|Cornell||3,350||Did not report||2,803||Did not report|
|Duke||1,326||1,335||Did not report||957|
|Georgetown||3,197||Did not report||1,487||Did not report|
Does the underreporting of the numbers reflect an "unwillingness ... to confront the possibility that a drop in circulation might be connected to a drop in influence or status[?]" Davies wonders.
He is quick to note, though, that with the increased availability of the law reviews through electronic means, including services such as Westlaw and Lexis and HeinOnline, it is distinctly possible that the "net consumption of law reviews is actually on the rise, along with their influence or status."
But without good and accurate data from the publishers, Davies says, "Who knows?"
Search for Jobs