New research by professors at the University of Bristol suggests that biologists may be avoiding scientific papers that have extensive mathematical detail, Times Higher Education reported. The Bristol researchers studied the number of citations to 600 evolutionary biology papers published in 1998. They found that the most "maths-heavy" papers were cited by others half as much as other papers. Each additional math equation appears to reduce the odds of a paper being cited. Tim Fawcett, a co-author of the paper, told Times Higher Education, "I think this is potentially something that could be a problem for all areas of science where there is a tight link between the theoretical mathematical models and experiment."
- Illinois Professor Fined for Skipping State's Ethics Training
- After months of build-up, BCS presidents approve college football playoff
- Academic Minute: Dating the Solar System
- Essay on why academics need to protect their health
- Review of Zygmunt Bauman, 'On Education'
- At birthday celebration, land-grant colleges get advice about their future
- German University Uses Subtitles for Foreign Students
- Texas Wesleyan Law School Joins Texas A&M
Search for Jobs