In which a veteran of cultural studies seminars in the 1990s moves into academic administration and finds himself a married suburban father of two. Foucault, plus lawn care.
Just a few weeks after the City College of San Francisco was put on severe notice by its regional accreditor, and just a few days after an audit report found that the college is verging on insolvency, CCSF proudly announced ... its new 14 story, $138 million building!
I can’t. I just...I can’t even.
Okay, I’ll try to stop pounding my head on the table long enough to try to make sense of this.
In fairness, construction projects are years in the making. This project apparently started back in the 1990’s, when the college’s situation was less dire. And in this case, as in most, the money that was spent on construction generally would not have been available for other uses. In this case, it came from bond issues, donations, and state funds. The state funds may or may not have theoretically been available for other things, but the bond issues and donations were earmarked. (The article isn’t clear on who is responsible for paying off the bonds.)
In some ways, that fiscal distribution shows how long the building has been in the works. These days, campus construction tends to be more self-funded. But before the Great Recession, it wasn’t unusual to get dedicated state funds (whether through state bond issues or appropriations) that could only be used for construction. Capital budgets, which paid for buildings, and operating budgets, which paid for people, couldn’t be mixed. For a while, it was often easier to pay for a building than to pay for the people who would work in it.
That said, though, a project of this magnitude, at this time, pretty much confirms the picture of a college without a central administration strong enough to say “no.” Even leaving the money aside -- which is a bit like leaving the iceberg aside when discussing the Titanic -- there’s a basic issue of project and site management. Given the administrative thinness of CCSF, the idea of adding another site of this magnitude and complexity is simply absurd. Who’s there to mind the store?
The article doesn’t inspire confidence. It notes:
Closing some City College campuses has been discussed as one way to save money. But even the state's Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team - brought in to help City College - was frustrated because the college is unsure of how much any of its campuses cost.
"They don't have the data to show whether they're saving money or not" on the new campus, said Michelle Plumbtree, an analyst with the team. "It's definitely a problem."
Yes, it is.
I’m guessing that the people on campus are thinking that this will bring in tremendous new revenue, one way or another, and/or swing community political sentiment to its side. Anything is possible, but if it looks like an albatross and it walks like an albatross...
I don’t say this lightly. The new building may well fetch a good price at the liquidation sale. Meanwhile, it’s time for the California system to draw up an entirely new plan for serving the students of San Francisco.