2013 March Madness academic bracket, women's edition
- Who would win the NCAA women's basketball tournament if academics ruled?
- The 2012 NCAA March Madness Academic Performance Tournament, Women's Edition
- Who would win the NCAA tournament if the games were decided by academic performance?
- A Bracket Not to Bet On
- The 2012 NCAA March Madness Academic Performance Tournament
Welcome to the second annual women's Academic Performance Tournament, where the seeds are irrelevant and studies are paramount. In this reimagined March Madness, we determine the winners of the National Collegiate Athletic Association women's basketball tournament based on classroom skills, not court finesse.
That's not to say the two are mutually exclusive -- although the 2012 men's bracket saw more similarities between the academic winners and the athletic ones than the women's bracket did. Last year, DePaul took the academic title, while Baylor emerged victorious on the court. (Both teams look to repeat their respective titles this year.)
In our tournament, teams progress based on their multiyear Academic Progress Rate, an NCAA measure of their classroom performance. When two teams with perfect APRs meet, we turn to the NCAA's Graduation Success Rate, which measures the proportion of athletes on track to matriculate within six years. If teams mirror one another on that score -- and a handful did this year -- our ultimate tiebreaker is the federal graduation rate.
We had a few nail-biter match-ups this year, with the tournament champion edging out the runner-up by a single GSR point. Check out the bracket below (and if you missed it Monday, click here for the results of the men's tournament).