Professors Question Marshall U. Athletic Spending
- Quick Takes: Students Who Work, Churchill Objects to New Charges, Indictments in Lab Attack, Bond Vote Called Off, Harvard Law Curricular Review, Court Permits Suit Against Marshall, House Panel Acts on Humanities Funds, Cornerstone Keeps Vice Bans
- Bad Time for Sports Overspending
- Nothing to Cheer About
- Universities spend more on athletics per athlete than on academics per student, report finds
- Franklin & Marshall targets charter schools like KIPP for new source of students
Faculty leaders at Marshall University are raising questions about athletic spending, particularly in light of budget cuts to academic programs, The Herald-Dispatch reported. Faculty members say that they have been promised for years that athletics would become self-supporting, but that it remains a serious drain on funds. Last year, the athletics budget was nearly $25 million, and 46 percent of that was financed through student fees or direct university support. Professors are asking why those funds shouldn't be used to minimize academic cuts. Pamela Mulder, a psychology professor, told the newspaper that athletics was helping "very few people and not remotely connected to the physical well-being of our overall student body." David Steele, Marshall's associate athletics director, said that the university spends less on athletics than many of its peers. He added: "We're part of the institution, and we have to work together to make it work."