Skip to main content
Inside Higher Ed Home
  • Search
  • Institutional Access

    Your institution provides full access to Inside Higher Ed content.

  • Subscribe
Menu
  • Search
  • Subscribe
  • Insider Dashboard
  • My Account
  • Institutional Access

    Your institution provides full access to Inside Higher Ed content.

    • Menu
    • Subscribe
    • Find a Job
    • News
    • Faculty
      • Contingent Faculty
      • Curriculum
      • Teaching
      • Learning & Assessment
      • Diversity & Equity
      • Career Development
      • Tenure
      • Retirement
      • Labor & Unionization
      • Shared Governance
      • Academic Freedom
      • Research
      • Books & Publishing
    • Students
      • Academics
      • Graduate students and Postdocs
      • Retention
      • Financial Aid
      • Careers
      • Residential Life
      • Athletics
      • Free Speech
      • Physical & Mental Health
      • Safety
    • Diversity
      • Race & Ethnicity
      • Sex & Gender
      • Socioeconomics
      • Religion
      • Disability
      • Age
    • Admissions
      • Traditional-Age
      • Adult & Post-Traditional
      • Transfer
      • Graduate
    • Tech & Innovation
      • Teaching & Learning
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Digital Publishing
      • Data Analytics
      • Libraries
      • Administrative Tech
      • Alternative Credentials
    • Business
      • Financial Health
      • Cost-Cutting
      • Revenue Strategies
      • Academic Programs
      • Physical Campuses
      • Mergers & Collaboration
      • Fundraising
    • Institutions
      • Research Universities
      • Regional Public Universities
      • Community Colleges
      • Private Nonprofit Colleges
      • Minority-Serving Institutions
      • Religious Colleges
      • Women's Colleges
      • Specialized Colleges
      • For-Profit Colleges
    • Governance
      • Executive Leadership
      • Trustees & Regents
      • State Oversight
      • Accreditation
    • Government
      • Politics & Elections
      • Courts
      • Student Aid Policy
      • Science & Research Policy
      • State Policy
      • Colleges & Localities
    • Workplace
      • Employee Satisfaction
      • Remote & Flexible Work
      • Staff Issues
    • Global
      • Study Abroad
      • International Students in U.S.
      • U.S. Colleges in the World
    • Opinion
    • Views
      • Intellectual Affairs
    • Career Advice
      • Seeking a Faculty Job
      • Advancing in the Faculty
      • Teaching
      • Seeking an Administrative Job
      • Advancing as an Administrator
      • Diversity
    • Columns
      • The Academic Worker
      • Beyond Transfer
      • Call to Action
      • Confessions of a Community College Dean
      • Debatable Ideas
      • Echoes in the Quad
      • Editor’s Note
      • Everything Is Fine
      • Just Visiting
      • Leadership in Higher Education
      • Learning Innovation
      • Online: Trending Now
      • The Public Scholar
      • Resident Scholar
      • Small World
      • Tough Love
    • Letters
    • Hubs
    • Student Success
      • Student Voice
      • Academic Life
      • Health & Wellness
      • The College Experience
      • Life After College
    • Special
    • Podcasts
      • The Key
      • Academic Minute
      • Campus
      • The Pulse
      • Weekly Wisdom
    • Reports & Data
    • Events
    • Quick Takes
    • Solutions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Advertising & Marketing
    • Consulting Services
    • Data & Insights
    • Hiring & Jobs
    • Event Partnerships
    • Campus+
    • More
    • Post a Job
    • Campus
    • About
    • Contact Us
Insider Dashboard
  • About Insider
  • The Sandbox
  • Webcasts
  • Reports
  • About Insider
  • The Sandbox
  • Webcasts
  • Reports
October 10, 2026

A Proposal for Fundraising

How to solve money problems in one easy step.

By  Rachel Toor

The Sandbox

Inside Higher Ed Insider
stacking a bunch of dollar bills

From Rachel Toor

Every teacher knows this feeling: When students take what you’ve offered them and tweak it to give it a unique twist, often coming up with something better than you could have imagined, well, that’s as good as it gets.

The wonderful readers of The Sandbox have picked up on the idea that this forum is a place to play, to experiment, to have fun. A few weeks ago when the two lady presidents sent me their text messages, I whooped hooray! And now I have a fellow Swift enthusiast offering his own modest proposal.

I do think it’s not impossible that in our current climate there may someday be a real suggestion coming out of D.C. that we do something akin to eating babies. And we all know which kinds of babies would be served up: those whose families are having to choose between gas, food, and rent.

At a time when everyone is mad, sad, or hopeless, we all have to try to keep a sense of humor. Sure, this one is beating up on the “elite” at a time when that is too much in fashion, but I think they can take it.

The writer is a former president.

There’s a simple way to raise funds for doing the good work that we do—making the world a better place by educating young minds—with a minimal, incremental increase in moral compromise from what now happens regularly in the most elite colleges and universities in America. 

Not all of them, of course, but at most of the truly great universities, most of the American “ancients,” surely. It will not be hard at all. We can minimally modify our existing systems in which admissions slots at those elite colleges and universities (and so many of us know exactly which ones) are sold in a market, albeit a market that is not visible to the vast majority of students and their families trying to gain admission to these grand institutions. 

We add a single step to the process of submission and formalizing grades of students: The proposed grade lists are pinged against a list of donors or potential donors to the school who have expressed an interest in selected students graduating with the highest GPA possible. 

Someone either in the office of the president or in the development office will communicate with selected donors or potential donors (let’s just call them DPDs—acronyms are so much more palatable!) and if the DPD wishes to have the anticipated grade of the student raised, the contact will arrange a conversation to explore how the school can help the DPD “manifest their vision of impact on society” while helping the school meet its mission. You know that narrative. 

Of course, we will not be so crass as to have a specific price list, though that is the natural next incremental step (the cost of a grade increase would depend upon the perceived difficulty of the course and the proposed grade and the gap between the actual and the proposed grade). The school’s representative will suggest a price that is reasonable (maybe in the form of a question: “Do you think your contribution might meaningfully fit with your vision for assisting our mission at the level of a small scholarship, perhaps $100,000?”) and the DPD will signal acceptance with a knowing nod. Now, because these sums are likely to be smaller than what it takes to get a kid into one of the American ancients, the money will have to be in hand before the grade is changed. 

At some point, we might think of packaging DPDs’ prepaid contributions at the time of admission. Perhaps 10 course grade increases of one level each over the four years of the time of the student (whose admission was also purchased, of course)? But we can worry about the details later.

I know, I know, something about this proposal surely makes you just a little bit anxious. It just doesn’t seem right. But trust me on this one. You and I will soon manage to convince ourselves that it is justifiable when you look at the bigger picture. We will think of it as we already do when it comes to selling admissions to elite colleges and universities: The ends justify the means. 

Think of the deadly diseases we can cure, the scholarships and professorships we can fund, the student centers we can build! Think of how much good can be done with this small incremental moral compromise. And it really is tiny when you think about it, just a small leap from the current circumstances in which every year many of the most selective colleges and universities in the world sell slots for the children of those DPDs. 

I have been told by a knowing young acquaintance that at some elite secondary schools with large populations of wealthy students, the price of admission to colleges is actually well-known and discussed widely within those circles of students. And the level of wealth of the DPD sufficient to gain even interest from the ancients for admissions “assistance” continues to increase. These days, it usually takes wealth of over $100 million for the ancients to be seriously interested. Soon it will be $500 million or even $1 billion.

And, I am told, that one clue that a purchase (let’s stop calling these “donor admissions,” shall we and call a fig a fig—they are purchases!) is in the works: The student seems strangely confident of getting into a somewhat surprisingly competitive list of schools. Disproportionately confident, I might avow, in light of their academic, social, and athletic record during a first meeting with the college admissions counselor. 

And of course, in a world in which the majority of students at elite private secondary schools, as well as colleges and universities, already earn A’s in most of their classes and with the now widespread use of AI, the moral compromise from selling a mark-up from a B or even a C to an A is nothing compared to selling an admissions slot. We are so deeply compromised already, this small step really is nothing.

But grades are about the work of the student, you say? Well, isn’t an admissions offer supposed to be about the work of the student? Even athletics admissions—dripping in the taint of wealth as they are—are at least on some level (the Varsity Blues scandal not withstanding) defensibly about the performance of the student. How is selling grades any different? 
 
It is not different. We just haven’t done it widely. Yet. But give us time (and at the rate of destruction of higher education institutions with the Trump attacks, this may happen sooner than we might think). Let’s stop pretending that we are these august institutions that care about principles and character when our most elite institutions regularly demonstrate neither when they sell admissions slots. 
 
And we need to stop whining about students becoming more “transactional” with our noses in the air when students are merely following the modeling of our great colleges and universities. Let the market decide grades, as it does admissions—for some. Let’s fully live our real values! Surely there is an apt expression in Latin for that sentiment. Excuse me while I go scan a few college seals.
 
I profess, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavoring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the public good of the higher education of our wealthiest families and the continued survival of our most ancient colleges and universities. I am no longer in the position of being a leader of a “highly selective” institution and can in no way benefit from this practice. And my children have all now earned their degrees. 
https://moderncampus.com/the-5g-learner

Want to advertise here?

Feel free to forward this email to anyone.

photo of Harry the dog shaking off water

We know the haters are gonna hate, hate, hate, hate. So be like Harry: Shake it off, friends. 

JOIN TODAY

 

The Sandbox

Not your typical weekly newsletter. This is a space where presidents and chancellors can say what they really think without fear. Everyone is welcome to read, but only those who have been in the top job can submit to us. The Sandbox, by Rachel Toor, is an exclusive benefit of our paid Insider membership program.

 

 

The Sandbox Archive

The Worst of Times: FY 2025–26

October 3, 2026

Hiring a Leadership Team

September 26, 2026

The Real Text Messages of Lady Presidents

September 19, 2026

Retreat Rights

September 12, 2026

What Does a College Student Look Like?

August 29, 2026
View All
Advertisement

Company

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Work with Us
  • History
  • Meet the Team
  • Advertise
  • Subscriptions
  • Find a Job
  • Post a Job

Legal

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Newsletter

Create a free account and get higher ed's most essential news, analysis, and career advice delivered to your inbox.

Copyright © 2026 Inside Higher Ed All rights reserved.

  • Menu
  • Insider Dashboard
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Find a Job
  • News
  • Faculty
    • Contingent Faculty
    • Curriculum
    • Teaching
    • Learning & Assessment
    • Diversity & Equity
    • Career Development
    • Tenure
    • Retirement
    • Labor & Unionization
    • Shared Governance
    • Academic Freedom
    • Research
    • Books & Publishing
  • Students
    • Academics
    • Graduate students and Postdocs
    • Retention
    • Financial Aid
    • Careers
    • Residential Life
    • Athletics
    • Free Speech
    • Physical & Mental Health
    • Safety
  • Diversity
    • Race & Ethnicity
    • Sex & Gender
    • Socioeconomics
    • Religion
    • Disability
    • Age
  • Admissions
    • Traditional-Age
    • Adult & Post-Traditional
    • Transfer
    • Graduate
  • Tech & Innovation
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Digital Publishing
    • Data Analytics
    • Libraries
    • Administrative Tech
    • Alternative Credentials
  • Business
    • Financial Health
    • Cost-Cutting
    • Revenue Strategies
    • Academic Programs
    • Physical Campuses
    • Mergers & Collaboration
    • Fundraising
  • Institutions
    • Research Universities
    • Regional Public Universities
    • Community Colleges
    • Private Nonprofit Colleges
    • Minority-Serving Institutions
    • Religious Colleges
    • Women's Colleges
    • Specialized Colleges
    • For-Profit Colleges
  • Governance
    • Executive Leadership
    • Trustees & Regents
    • State Oversight
    • Accreditation
  • Government
    • Politics & Elections
    • Courts
    • Student Aid Policy
    • Science & Research Policy
    • State Policy
    • Colleges & Localities
  • Workplace
    • Employee Satisfaction
    • Remote & Flexible Work
    • Staff Issues
  • Global
    • Study Abroad
    • International Students in U.S.
    • U.S. Colleges in the World
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
  • Views
    • Intellectual Affairs
  • Career Advice
    • Seeking a Faculty Job
    • Advancing in the Faculty
    • Teaching
    • Seeking an Administrative Job
    • Advancing as an Administrator
    • Diversity
  • Columns
    • The Academic Worker
    • Beyond Transfer
    • Call to Action
    • Confessions of a Community College Dean
    • Debatable Ideas
    • Echoes in the Quad
    • Editor’s Note
    • Everything Is Fine
    • Just Visiting
    • Leadership in Higher Education
    • Learning Innovation
    • Online: Trending Now
    • The Public Scholar
    • Resident Scholar
    • Small World
    • Tough Love
  • Letters
  • Hubs
  • Student Success
    • Student Voice
    • Academic Life
    • Health & Wellness
    • The College Experience
    • Life After College
  • Special
  • Podcasts
    • The Key
    • Academic Minute
    • Campus
    • The Pulse
    • Weekly Wisdom
  • Reports & Data
  • Events
  • Quick Takes
  • Solutions
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Advertising & Marketing
  • Consulting Services
  • Data & Insights
  • Hiring & Jobs
  • Event Partnerships
  • Campus+
  • More
  • Post a Job
  • Campus
  • About
  • Contact Us