It's generally a good thing when a post receives more than 20 comments. Sometimes comments are brought about by a radical idea or question. In other posts, comments have a bit more "troll flavor" to them. And, sometimes comments on a post are a mix of troll drive-bys, appreciation, criticism, and once in a while...wisdom. Last week, after a rather hectic week of work, business travel, and logistics, I sat down and wrote a post about my preference for Starbucks stores. Little did I realize the turmoil that my post would generate.
Having been a blogger since 2004, I get how this genre works. Bloggers write, commenters comment, and most of the time (if we're lucky) discourse is achieved. However, perhaps the London heat is getting to me, but I find it to be incredibly ironic that a higher education news site attracts so many people who seem hell-bent on always being hyperbolically critical in their commentary. Regarding the comment that said that my blog is "losing its appeal," I say thank you (it's sort of a compliment when you really look at it...past appeal, currently declining, potential for upswing?) and I hope that you continue reading. In the case of the "corporate endorsement" commenter, I must say that I will continue to remain a member of this mostly-capitalist-based global society until radical changes (my vote would be towards worldwide socialism and unified currency) take place. Additionally, I hope that you abstain from buying anything from Target, driving a motor vehicle, and engaging in any type of non-credit-union-based-banking activity.
Blogging has been my calm port in an always stormy cerebral sea. Writing as it most-likely always has been, is a cathartic release of ideas and consciousness. It is true that I have definitely engaged in a hyper-critical style of blogging in the past. And, I will most-likely continue to ebb and flow with my critical pieces juxtaposed with my "I like LinkedIn" posts.
When I began blogging, as part of my graduate school experience, I wrote from a mostly-critical point of view. However, as I have grown as both a person and a professional, critiquing everything in sight is not always a rewarding exercise. In fact, it often alienates those who most need to read something that might just push them in a more positive direction.
As a consultant, speaker, and writer, I often say that I get paid to think. The one constant that has been woven throughout my career is a sense that the impenetrable wall that keeps my fellow practitioners from being more technologically adept and informed is both a blessing and a curse. My sole proprietorship is constructed and consistent due to the seemingly endless need that higher education entities have for strategic communications consulting. My ideas aren't always radical or critical, but I do hope that the anti-technology wall eventually crumbles and I am able to engage in rhetoric that builds things up rather than dealing with the sense that this space will always be about banging my sense of hope into a brick wall. So, bring comments and good will. Bring insights and information. The journey of blogging, writing, thinking, and churning through this wonderful jumble that is higher education continues.
Do you tweet? Let's connect. Follow me on Twitter.
Read more by
Opinions on Inside Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed’s Blog U
What Others Are Reading