-
Learning Innovation
A space for conversation and debate about learning and technology.
Title
A Calm, Reasonable, and Wise 'On the Future’
Humanity's prospects.
On the Future: Prospects for Humanity by Martin Rees
Published in October of 2018.
How would you answer this question:
Will the lives of our grandkids be better than our own?
This is a question about progress. Are things, in general, likely to get better or worse? Will the world be a better place in 2050 than it is in 2018?
When posed these questions, many higher ed people will answer in the negative. Academics who are optimistic about the future are often viewed as unthinking, naive, and privileged.
If you count yourself among the tribe of pessimists, or even if you are agnostic about the future, I suggest that you first take the time to read On the Future.
It was Scott McLemee’s review that first led me the book. That I could read Scott’s well-written and informative book review at zero cost to me, and then download the audiobook version for $6.95, is evidence that the world is a pretty great place. The fact that I did all of these things on my phone says something about progress.
Martin Rees, who when he is not writing books is Astronomer Royal, is guardedly optimistic about humanity’s future. He is a technology optimist and a political realist. The big message that Reese wants to impart is that governments and companies need to have the discipline and courage to take the long view.
As a renowned astrophysicist, Rees has considerable experience as a big picture thinker. Rees would like to see much greater investments in clean energy, as well as more substantial commitments by wealthy nations to combat climate change and global poverty, then today’s shortsighted politicians seem able to muster.
On the Future is a concise book about big ideas. The book contains brief, but well-articulated, descriptions of the likely impact of artificial intelligence and automation on employment and well-being. The warning that it is not the technology that will drive greater inequality, but rather the political choices that we will make on how excess income will be distributed, is worthy of further discussion.
Rees is modest in his predictions, taking pains to point out that it almost never ends well when academics stray from their disciplinary expertise. We need more professors to write more books about the future.
How are you feeling about 2050?
What books would you recommend about the prospects for humanity?
What are you reading?
Trending Stories
THE Campus
Resources for faculty and staff from our partners at Times Higher Education.
- How to tell if your university is making a genuine effort to increase diversity
- Strengthening academic integrity requires action from students and teachers alike
- Asynchronous pedagogy to improve student engagement
- How to raise the bar on the teaching section of your CV
- Challenges and opportunities of the 60-year curriculum
Most Shared Stories
- Academic experts offer advice on ChatGPT
- ChatGPT sparks debate on how to design student assignments now
- Women chairs face mushrooming demands with inadequate support (opinion) | Inside Higher Ed
- When disgraced presidents return (or never go away)
- The role of the liberal arts in an era of skills-based hiring
But What About Outcomes?
It’s Complicated