-
Learning Innovation
A space for conversation and debate about learning and technology.
Title
Can We Argue With 'The Value of Everything’?
An invitation to academics to my right.
By
The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy by Mariana Mazzucato
Published in September of 2018.
In The Value of Everything, Mariana Mazzucato makes three interlocking arguments.
The first is that the measure of economic activity should not be profit or growth, but instead societal and family and individual well-being.
The second argument is a book-length rebuttal to the idea that the purpose of a company is to maximize shareholder, as opposed to stakeholder, value.
Third, Mazzucato takes on the belief that government spending on social programs and infrastructure and R&D is akin to non-productive consumption. She argues that government plays a key and irreplaceable role as an investor in building societal wealth.
The question is if this Mazzucato, a professor at University College London (UCL), will convince anyone to change their mind?
I have a hard time imagining a more eloquently argued, data-driven, or historically contextualized book than The Value of Everything.
Mazzucato has done an excellent job of synthesizing the history of economic thought. The book excels in its explanation of how we got a place where GDP growth and stock valuation is prioritized over other outcomes, such as reducing childhood poverty or improving public health or expanding educational opportunities.
As convinced as I was by the Value of Everything, I fear that a book like this perfectly plays into my prior beliefs. I’m all for public investment in education (especially higher education), public health, and infrastructure. I already know the role that defense spending played in the development of the technologies that you and I depend, from the internet to the smartphone.
What I’m looking for is a book explicitly aimed at persuading liberal-to-moderate types (like me) that we are wrong in how we think about economics. Almost as good would be a book that takes the thinking of Hayek and his intellectual followers seriously, and then attempts a new synthesis with a set of economic ideas.
As with every excellent economics and public policy book that I read from the centrist-to-lefty side of the spectrum, I want to know the counter-arguments. The right person with to discuss The Value of Everything would be someone on the right.
My ask to professor Mazzucato, and other economic thinkers that I admire, is to acquire a research and writing partner who disagrees with you. Once paired up, try to listen to and understand the arguments against your thinking - and then see if scholarship can be created at a place of common ground.
Does this ever happen in academia?
If you are a right-of-center academic, would you be willing to read and talk about The Value of Everything?
What would you like us to be reading that has shaped your beliefs on the role of government and companies in society?
What are you reading?
Read more by
Inside Higher Ed Careers
Hiring? Post A Job Today!
Browse Faculty Jobs
Browse Administrative Jobs
Browse Executive Administration Jobs
College Pages
Popular Right Now
Grand Canyon sues U.S. Education Department for rejecting its conversion to nonprofit status
Long-term online learning in pandemic may impact students' well-being
Education Department releases billions in aid to colleges
How to write an effective diversity statement (essay)
10 strategies to support students and help them learn during the coronavirus crisis (opinion)
Students in great need of mental health support during pandemic
Advice for students so they don't sound silly in emails (essay)
Trump's claim about saving HBCUs was false, but his administration has largely backed sector
Chapman professor who spoke at Jan. 6 pro-Trump rally retires
We are retiring comments and introducing Letters to the Editor. Share your thoughts »
Expand commentsHide comments