Views

Keith B. Murray argues that thinking of students as customers gets the professor’s role all wrong.

Social trust is fraying, zombie bugs are on the loose and human ingenuity never fails to surprise—Scott McLemee rounds up select forthcoming titles from university presses.

In shifting much of the responsibility for upholding academic integrity from instructors to students, we leave students with an unfair burden, Daniel Cryer writes.

You know there’s something wrong when the proportion of low-income students at elite colleges has barely changed over a century, Jim Jump writes.

Daniel A. Collier writes that Linda McMahon’s approach as secretary of education may not mirror that of Betsy DeVos.

Annmarie Caño suggests systemic changes to awards and recognition processes to make them more inclusive and less prone to bias.

Melinda Manning, an erstwhile critic of UNC Chapel Hill’s Title IX processes, writes that she was happily surprised to see improved processes in action.

Building reliance on Silicon Valley AI companies carries risks, Collin Bjork writes.