Academics remain reluctant to allow their journal articles to be deposited in open-access repositories, according to the Oxford University Press. The press announced Thursday that the percentage of Oxford Press articles authorized for re-publication in its open-access repository decreased overall from 6.7 to 5.9 percent between 2008 and 2009. Officials attributed the decrease to a relatively low rate of opt-ins from 11 new journals to which the option was extended in 2009; putting those new titles aside, the proportion of authors allowing their work to be made freely available stayed roughly the same. Still, the stagnation of that rate indicates that researchers are still wary of endorsing an open-access model, Oxford officials said in a release. Humanities scholars were the least willing to participate in Oxford Open, the press's open-access initiative, opting in at a rate of 2.5 percent. Life sciences scholars were the most generous with their work, with 11.4 percent allowing their papers to be freely accessible.
- Harvard Opts In to 'Opt Out' Plan
- Academic, library and technology groups criticize new Elsevier sharing and hosting policy
- Historians' organization issues statement calling for caution on 'open access'
- More higher ed, library groups speak out in support of Lingua editors
- Taming the Textbook Market
- MLA embraces "open access" writer agreements for journals
- Questioning the 'Citation Advantage'
- Publishers, universities both prep open access plans
Search for Jobs