Many law schools in recent years have increased spending on merit scholarships, hoping to attract top students and to boost rankings. But an article in The New York Times noted why some of the recipients feel that the law schools are playing a game of bait and switch. Many of the scholarships have grade-point-average requirements that recipients assume they can meet, but some of the law schools use curves on grading that make it virtually impossible for a good number of scholarship recipients to hold on to their grants. This means they end up enrolling at expensive institutions, and are faced with unexpectedly high bills their second or third years.
- The law school transfer market heats up, getting some deans hot under the collar
- Baylor Abandons SAT Payments
- Baylor Pays for SAT Gains
- 'New York Times' introduces new index of colleges' commitment to low-income students
- Law school makes applicants a 24-hour offer
- Rankings Are Useful -- But Go Beyond 'U.S. News'
- Colorado colleges can double-count merit scholars to grow non-resident enrollment
- Admissions leaders and legal experts debate how to define merit
Search for Jobs