The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed an order by a district court dismissing a suit brought by a Chinese graduate student at the University of California, Los Angeles, who alleged the university discriminated against him based on sex in the course of a Title IX disciplinary investigation after a former student accused him of misconduct.
In a Jan. 11 ruling in favor of the student, identified as John Doe, the three-judge panel “concluded that Doe’s allegations of external pressures impacting how the university handled sexual misconduct complaints, an internal pattern and practice of bias in the University of California and at UCLA in particular, and specific instances of bias in Doe’s particular disciplinary case, when combined, raised a plausible inference of discrimination on the basis of sex sufficient to withstand dismissal.”
Opinions on Inside Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed’s Blog U
Trending Stories
- Young adults today are slower to gain financial independence
- You Can’t Ignore That a Pandemic Happened | Just Visiting
- Racist Fraternity Joke Prompts Outrage at Duke
- Why the First Year Matters Most for Transfer | Beyond Transfer
- Seven professor actions that contribute to student well-being (infographic)
Most Shared Stories
- Turnover, burnout and demoralization in higher ed
- Britain's largest academic union divided by transgender issues
- Jury awards falsely accused former Clemson student $5.3 million
- Higher education should prepare for five new realities (opinion) | Inside Higher Ed
- Innovative solution to deferred maintenance costs
We have retired comments and introduced Letters to the Editor. Letters may be sent to [email protected].
Read the Letters to the Editor »