-
Just Visiting
John Warner is the author of Why They Can't Write: Killing the Five-Paragraph Essay and Other Necessities and The Writer's Practice: Building Confidence in Your Nonfiction Writing.
Title
Diversity and the Pipeline Problem
In my experience as editor of a cultishly popular humor website, seeking diversity was a key to improving quality.
By
I will admit, my familiarity with hiring in academic circles is largely secondhand. I’ve never sat on a hiring committee and barely ever applied for a tenure track job.
But one of the things I hear when people talk about the difficulty of bringing more diversity to the professorate is the “pipeline problem,” that there simply aren’t enough qualified candidates to achieve those diversity goals.
While I have no intimate familiarity with pipelines in academia, I’m highly experienced with pipelines in a different field: comedy writing.
During a recent panel discussion with four executive producers for late-night television shows, the subject of diversity in writing staffs – a longstanding issue in the industry – came up.
While all agreed that things are improving, it was posited that the difficulties in achieving diversity were not because of discrimination, but because there was a “lack of candidates.”
The places where those candidates were to be found – Second City, the Groundlings – had very few women members, for example, and sometimes, not a single woman would apply for open positions. If someone doesn’t apply, they can’t be hired.
In other words, the industry had a pipeline problem.
From 2003 to 2008, I helmed McSweeney’s Internet Tendency, a far more humble comedy enterprise than a network late-night show, but like those shows, we had an insatiable need for humorous content from funny writers.
Because I was working as a college instructor in Virginia and then South Carolina, I had no existing pipeline to places like the Harvard Lampoon – a consistent feeder to late-night TV – or high profile improv groups.
I had an email inbox.
In the earliest days, it was sometimes tough to find material I considered good enough to publish. I leaned on some past contributors pretty heavily, but as our audience increased, so did the traffic to the submissions inbox.
I noticed a few things.
1. At the start, men counted for between 70 and 80 percent of the submissions.
2. Upon receiving a rejection, men were much more inclined to follow up with another submission, sometimes almost immediately.[1]
3. While women were a much smaller percentage of the total submissions, they had a much higher likelihood of acceptance.
4. Women who had received a rejection were much less likely to resubmit right away, and sometimes would not resubmit at all.
On the surface, unlike the more prominent (and actually paying) comedy entities, we had an egalitarian pipeline. I didn’t care what your background was, who you’d interned for, or where you took improv classes, I was starved for content. But even that egalitarian pipeline wasn’t doing the job by itself.
Please recognize, I am not championing myself as some contender for gold in the woke Olympics. I had no explicit goal to achieve diversity on the McSweeney’s Internet Tendency pages. I only wanted to ease my own burden over having to relentlessly seek out funny content. Women were an underutilized source of that content.
I did one small thing. While all rejections were prompt, polite, and personal, reflecting on the lower rates of resubmission among women, I started writing short (and I mean short) bits of encouragement to those writers who really had gotten close, but not quite over the top. At the same time, I – let’s just go with “hounded” – our existing female contributors for more material.
Over time, the percentage of submissions by women increased. Many writers who had been rejected initially ultimately landed material on the site and subsequently became consistent contributors.[2]
Since my ceding the helm to Chris Monks just over ten years ago, that trend has only increased, aided significantly by him taking the site to new heights of audience, while also retaining that egalitarian pipeline.[3]
I now get to read the site for pleasure, rather than ocupationally, and no offense to the fellas, the women are dominating.[4]
I do not know what all of the women I listed in the footnote below do for a living, but if anyone is looking for people who can write funny and feel they would benefit from more women on their staffs, they are an excellent place to start.
One of the unspoken assumptions of the pipeline problem that must be challenged is not just who is getting into the pipeline at the start, but the nature of the “standards” which govern the flow through the pipeline. In comedy, for years, the assumption was that there just weren’t enough women who were up to snuff as measured against the dominant white guy, one-time member of the Harvard Lampoon staffing ethos that predominated in the elite outlets.
When the default goes unquestioned, undoubtedly some people who merit inclusion will be judged as falling short simply because of their differences from that default.
Put another way, what you think you’re looking for may not be what you really need. As higher education institutions change, this problem seems particularly acute, given that faculty positions and searches seem to follow a model codified during very different times. I’m particularly mystified when I see ads for institutions well below the handful of elite schools on the ladder of prestige that sound identical to those elite schools with the exception of doubling (or more) the teaching load.
Bottom line, lack of diversity was a quality problem, one that could be relatively easily remedied (at least for us) with only a small amount of intentionality. Chris Monks has taken the whole thing to a new level, expanding the intentionality of diversity beyond just gender.
There’s nothing inconsistent between this desire for diversity and quality. In fact, for the McSweeney’s Internet Tendency website, they’re explicitly intertwined. Readership has steadily increased, while also becoming increasingly more female. In fact, based on the available data, a majority of the site’s readers are now women. These things happening in tandem is not accidental.
The new thing will inevitably be somewhat different than the old thing, but in my experience, the new thing is far better. McSweeney's has grown into something that can now pay its contributors and sustain itself, not an easy proposition in today's digital publishing landscape.
If the standards reinforce a replication of the existing structures (as the late-night shows relying on existing pipelines did), some superior alternative may be overlooked.
There’s lots of pipelines out there, but it does require one to go looking for them. I wouldn’t have known this until I stumbled on that reality through circumstance, but I feel it could be as true in academia as it was for me in publishing comedy.
What say you?
[1]Because I prided myself on a quick turnaround, sometimes within hours, but no longer than a week, I had to learn who had another in barrel ready to go and occasionally delay a response by a day or two, just to prevent a deluge. The rapid-fire submitters also rarely seemed to hit the target.
[2]Perhaps my proudest “discovery” was Ellie Kemper, who has gone on to great success on The Officeand as star of The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. She submitted several times before breaking through on the site, all well in advance of her much larger breakthrough as a sought after comedic performer. It took no special skill on my part to recognize obvious talent, but if we hadn’t had an open pipeline, we never would’ve had the chance to publish her work.
[3]Chris works in a soundproof, windowless dungeon just outside Boston, with only an internet connection to the outside world, so he’s even less tapped into the existing comedy pipelines than I was.
[4]If you’re curious, check out the work of: Shannon Reed, Sarah Hutto, Cara Michelle Smith, Wendi Aarons, Broti Gupta, Kimberly Harrington, Caitlin Kunkel, Devorah Blachor, Rachel Klein, Wendy Molyneux, Sarah Walker, and Elly Lonon.
Read more by
Inside Higher Ed Careers
Browse Faculty Jobs
Browse Administrative Jobs
Browse Executive Administration Jobs
Topics
College Pages
Popular Right Now
College of New Rochelle announces that it will likely close this year
Scientists rally around Vanderbilt professor whose tenure bid appeared to hit roadblocks as Me Too a
Moves to kill UT Knoxville's Sex Week met with questions
Essay about how white male students dominate discussions sets off debate at Dickinson and beyond
NYU social work school admits to institutional racism in wake of student email
Almost a week of no internet at Amherst College
Professor asks who is the arbiter of lowbrow scholarly interests and pursuits
Opinions on Inside Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed’s Blog U
Sign Up / Sign In
With your existing account from...
{* loginWidget *}With a traditional account...
{* #signInForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *} {* currentPassword *} {* /signInForm *}Newsletter enrollment
Existing account found
We have found an existing account for the email address.
Please sign in to update your newsletter preferences.
{* /signInForm *}Newsletter opt-out
Edit your newsletter preferences
Account Info
Sign In
Welcome back, {* welcomeName *}!
{* loginWidget *}Sign In
Welcome Back
Account Deactivated
Your account has been deactivated.
Account Reactivation Failed
Sorry, we could not verify that email address.
Email Verification Required
You must verify your email address before signing in. Check your email for your verification email, or enter your email address in the form below to resend the email.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *}Almost Done
Please confirm the information below before signing in.
{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* firstName *} {* lastName *} {* displayName *} {* emailAddress *} {* optInIHE *} {* optIn3rdParty *} {* agreeToTerms *}Almost Done
Please confirm the information below before signing in. Already have an account? Sign In.
{* #registrationForm *} {* firstName *} {* lastName *} {* displayName *} {* emailAddress *} {* newPassword *} {* newPasswordConfirm *} {* optInIHE *} {* optIn3rdParty *} {* agreeToTerms *}Thank You for Registering
We have sent a confirmation email to {* emailAddressData *}. Please check your email and click on the link to verify your email address.
Create New Password
We'll send you a link to create a new password.
{* #forgotPasswordForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *}Create New Password
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
Create New Password
This email address was registered with a social account. We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password, which can be used in addition to your linked social providers.
{| current_emailAddress |}
{| foundExistingAccountText |} {| current_emailAddress |}.
{| existing_displayName |} - {| existing_provider |} : {| existing_siteName |} {| existing_createdDate |}
{| existing_provider_emailAddress |}
Sign In to Complete Account Merge
Resend Verification Email
Sorry, we could not verify that email address. Enter your email below, and we'll send you another email.
{* #resendVerificationForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *}Change Password
Create New Password
We didn't recognize that password reset code. Enter your email below, and we'll send you another email.
{* #resetPasswordForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *}Create New Password
We've sent you an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
Edit Your Account
Profile Photo
Linked Accounts
Link Your Accounts
This allows you to sign in to your account using that provider in the future.
Password
Deactivate Account
Change Password
Deactivate Your Account
Are you sure you want to deactivate your account? You will no longer have access to your profile.
{* deactivateAccountForm *} {* /deactivateAccountForm *}
Expand commentsHide comments — Join the conversation!