Transforming History Education Into a More Immersive, Interactive Process of Inquiry and Discovery

The future of history education lies in empowering students to engage in intensive research with carefully curated collections of primary sources, enhanced by AI-driven tools that provide context, insights and deeper connections. Not only is there no better way to enrich the learning experience, but this approach will foster critical thinking, research skills and a more nuanced understanding of historical events.

Primary sources—letters, diaries, official documents, maps, photographs—are the foundation of historical inquiry. These resources offer students a direct connection to the past. Engaging with these materials allows students to develop their own interpretations and form independent conclusions based on evidence. This inquiry-based approach mirrors the work of professional historians, shifting students from passive consumers of information to active participants in the construction of historical knowledge.

By directly interacting with the evidence of history rather than relying solely on secondary interpretations, students can develop a deeper connection with the past. Also, by engaging with primary sources, students develop critical research skills such as document analysis, source verification and argumentation based on evidence.

Carefully curated collections of primary sources ensure that students are exposed to materials that are both relevant and rich in historical significance. These collections can be tailored to match specific themes, events or time periods, providing a structured yet flexible framework for student research.

Curated collections help guide students to focus on particular historical events, figures or movements, reducing the overwhelming nature of vast archives and enabling them to explore deeper within a manageable scope. Of course, it’s essential that these collections include diverse and marginalized viewpoints, such as letters from soldiers and civilians during wartime and Indigenous accounts during colonial or later periods. This ensures a more comprehensive view of history, encouraging students to engage with multiple perspectives.

AI tools will play a crucial role in this future of history teaching by providing essential context, synthesizing large amounts of information and guiding students through complex historical inquiries. By providing summaries, background information and explanations of primary sources, these tools can help students quickly grasp the significance of documents they might not otherwise understand. AI can clarify archaic terms, unfamiliar references or complex historical concepts in real time, allowing students to dive into sources without getting lost or disengaged by unfamiliar language or context.

In addition, AI can analyze patterns in primary sources, identifying recurring themes, connections between documents and trends across time periods. This provides students with a broader understanding of how events are interconnected across history.

AI tools can personalize the learning experience by adapting content and questions to each student’s level of understanding and interests. Through adaptive technologies, AI can suggest sources and questions based on a student’s previous inquiries, helping them dig deeper into topics they are passionate about. AI can recommend additional resources, suggest new areas of exploration and prompt more complex questions as the student’s understanding grows.

AI tools can provide scaffolding for younger or less experienced students, while encouraging advanced students to pursue in-depth research. This makes it possible for a wide range of learners to engage meaningfully with historical inquiry.

History is not studied in isolation, and AI-driven tools can help students make connections across disciplines, linking historical documents to related fields such as literature and art, giving students a more integrated understanding of the past.

By guiding students through the process of historical inquiry, AI tools promote critical thinking. Rather than simply absorbing facts, students will be encouraged to ask questions, form hypotheses and engage in the process of historical analysis. In this way, we can better teach students how to construct well-reasoned arguments based on evidence.

By putting students in the role of historical researchers, this approach empowers them to take ownership of their learning, fostering curiosity, independence and a deeper appreciation for history and a richer understanding of the complexities of the past.

---

To truly transform history education, we must move beyond the limitations of traditional keyword searches, which fail to capture the depth and nuance required for meaningful historical inquiry.

Keyword searches, which match exact words but struggle to grasp the user’s intent or interpret context, are about to be overtaken by an AI-powered tools that hold out the prospect of transforming research into a more meaningful, dynamic and personalized inquiry and discovery process.

The Library of Congress recently issued a request for proposal to make its wealth of primary sources more accessible by K-12 teachers and students. That would be wonderful, but not if the library continues to rely on keyword searches. After all, keyword searches are highly literal and do not easily handle variations in phrasing, synonyms or more complex language. If users don’t use the exact right term, the search may fail to deliver relevant results.

Also, such searches rank results based on popularity and click-through rates, meaning that the most commonly viewed pages appear first. This can skew results toward popular or well-optimized content rather than the most insightful or relevant information.

Worse yet, keyword searches are not designed to handle complex, multilayered queries that require deeper analysis or cross-disciplinary thinking. They tend to return fragmented results rather than synthesizing information into meaningful insights.

I might add a number of other problems with keyword searches:

• Keyword searches typically treat every user the same. They don’t adjust to the user’s individual background, knowledge level or learning goals, making it harder to deliver results that are truly relevant to the user’s needs. A beginner and an expert searching for “the American Revolution” receive similar results, even though their needs and comprehension levels differ.
• Keyword searches struggle with ambiguous terms or questions, often returning results that are too broad or irrelevant. They cannot clarify user intent through follow-up questions or dialogue.
• Keyword searches operate on a linear retrieval model, presenting users with lists of results, ranked by relevance or popularity. This often leads to information silos, where users are limited to exploring only what the search engine presents rather than discovering new, related concepts.
• Keyword searches are passive in nature, relying on users to provide precise input and offering no opportunity for active engagement or iterative inquiry. They don’t guide users in refining or expanding their queries, leaving much of the search process to chance. If a user’s search query is too broad or vague, the search engine will deliver unsatisfactory results, without offering guidance or asking clarifying questions to improve the search.
• Keyword searches are generally text-based and don’t easily integrate other forms of content like images, audio or video into a cohesive learning experience.

As the limitations of keyword searches become more obvious, we need a new paradigm that allows students and teachers to explore deeper and engage with content in more meaningful ways. We need to empower users to go beyond information retrieval and embark on more active exploration.

The goal is to transform education the research process from passive information consumption to active discovery, tailored to the students’ needs, abilities and interests.

---

Let me offer an example of how we can do this.

If the learning resources and primary sources of the Library of Congress’s American Memory collection or the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History (which has the largest privately held collection of U.S. history documents and partners with over 40,000 schools) were curated by an AI-powered inquiry and discovery system, it would transform the learning process in profound ways:

• Personalized resource suggestions: AI could recommend documents, images and multimedia content aligned with students’ interests and knowledge levels and teachers’ objectives. A student studying the Civil War, for instance, might be guided from soldiers’ letters to political cartoons, Lincoln’s speeches and battle maps.
• Tailored content for varied skill levels: For younger students, AI could simplify complex materials through summaries or scaffolds. For advanced learners, it could suggest deeper research paths that link themes and historical periods.
• Differentiated instruction: AI could create customized lesson plans based on student performance, assign reading materials and group activities, or generate quizzes to assess understanding.
• Amplifying marginalized voices: AI could surface overlooked documents—such as Indigenous accounts, letters from enslaved people or immigrant perspectives—enriching students’ understanding with alternative viewpoints.
• Uncovering lesser-known sources: AI could recommend personal letters, obscure pamphlets and local newspapers, offering a deeper, more textured view of history.
• Historical simulations and role-playing: AI could use primary sources to create immersive experiences, where students virtually walk through events like the Lewis and Clark Expedition or debate the U.S. Constitution’s ratification using a variety of firsthand documents.
• Cross-disciplinary connections: AI could link historical documents with related literature, art and social movements. For example, exploring the Harlem Renaissance might reveal connections to both historical and literary works.
• Contextualizing and clarifying sources: AI could provide essential background information and define archaic terms in real time, making historical documents more accessible. A student studying Frederick Douglass’s speeches might instantly receive summaries of the abolitionist movement and his role within it using vetted materials already in the Library of Congress and Gilder Lehrman Institute’s collections.
• Concept maps and historical trends: AI could generate visual maps showing relationships between events, figures and themes, helping students grasp broader historical trends.
• Text analysis and recurrent themes: AI could analyze historical documents, identifying recurring terms, phrases or rhetoric, revealing patterns in historical discourse.
• Real-time feedback and inquiry guidance: AI could offer immediate feedback on student interpretations of primary sources, drawing attention to areas for further inquiry or missed connections.
• Advanced semantic search: AI would enable sophisticated searches, helping students find related concepts and themes beyond simple keywords, guiding them to explore further and ask more informed questions.
• Interactive engagement with historical figures: Students could virtually speak with figures like Susan B. Anthony, receiving AI-generated responses based on historical texts and speeches, creating a more dynamic interaction with history.

Integrating AI-powered inquiry and discovery systems with resources from the Gilder Lehrman Institute or the Library of Congress’s American Memory would revolutionize how students engage with history. This would provide personalized, immersive and interdisciplinary exploration, allowing students to uncover lesser-known narratives, draw connections across eras and develop critical thinking as they delve into the complexities of American history through AI-curated pathways.

---

AI has the potential to move beyond traditional keyword searches, transforming research into a dynamic process of inquiry and discovery. Here’s what’s already taking place:

1. Natural language understanding and processing. To surpass keyword-based search, AI uses advanced natural language processing and natural language understanding to interpret user queries expressed in natural, conversational language. This involves understanding the user’s true intent, beyond the literal words used; analyzing previous searches, user knowledge and context to provide more relevant responses; and identifying key concepts, relationships and meanings embedded in the query.
2. Semantic search and knowledge graphs. AI already has semantic search capabilities that go beyond word matching to grasp relationships between concepts. This requires constructing knowledge graphs that connect ideas not directly mentioned in the query, allowing deeper insights; that differentiate between similar terms and contexts to deliver more relevant and interconnected results; and that surface connections between fields, often overlooked in traditional search methods.
3. Contextual and personalized search. AI can adapt to the user’s knowledge level, preferences and goals. This means dynamically refining results based on feedback, past searches and ongoing interactions.
4. Supporting dynamic two-way interaction. The interface must engage in dialogue to prompt the students to refine or expand their inquiry; generate follow-up questions to deepen the user’s understanding of the subject; integrate text, images, video and audio to enrich the discovery process; and synthesize and summarize key insights from multiple sources, avoiding information overload.
5. Proactive discovery and recommendations. AI can recommend new areas of inquiry based on user interactions and search patterns, by suggesting related topics, guiding students through stages of research and linking knowledge across domains.
6. User-centric feedback loop. Collecting user feedback on search relevance and quality enables the AI to continually improve over time, refining its responses based on real-world use.
7. Analytic and visualization tools. AI can be supplemented with tools for text analysis and data visualization, enabling users to visualize information by generating charts, graphs or maps to make complex connections and relationships more visible and understandable.

---

To truly transform history education into an immersive and inquiry-driven experience, the integration of AI-powered tools must go beyond mere implementation. It requires a fundamental shift in how we approach teaching and learning. While tools like DreamBox, Khan Academy and AI-driven platforms such as ChatGPT and Khanmigo have already demonstrated the potential to personalize learning and support contextual understanding, the real breakthrough lies in leveraging these technologies to make education more dynamic, interactive and student-centered.

The promise of AI in history education is not just about providing more efficient access to information but about fostering a deeper, more engaged exploration of the past. By tailoring learning paths, encouraging cross-disciplinary connections and allowing students to interact with historical content in meaningful ways, AI can elevate education to a new level of active discovery.

However, the full realization of this vision requires thoughtful investments in teacher training, robust privacy protections, the curation of high-quality source materials and the development of tools that align with educational goals. Teachers will need to be trained and empowered to harness the potential of AI, guiding students through personalized inquiries while ensuring that technology enhances—rather than overshadows—the human element of learning.

These investments are not just an opportunity; they are essential. By embracing AI, we can cultivate students’ natural curiosity, promote critical thinking and provide a richer, more immersive learning experience. In doing so, we equip the next generation with the tools and insights they need to navigate the complexities of both history and the world around them. The future of education lies not in passive consumption but in active, inquiry-driven discovery—and AI is the key to unlocking that future.