You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.
When we think of democracy, we often picture elections, debates and the legislative process. But some of the most impactful democratic actions take place far from formal institutions, in grassroots movements that mobilize communities, challenge injustices and redefine what is possible.
Community organizing demonstrates that democracy is not just about the power vested in elected leaders; it’s about the power that ordinary people hold to reshape society. American democracy is often celebrated for its ideals of liberty and equality, yet it is the collective action of everyday citizens that has frequently propelled the nation’s most profound social transformations.
Throughout the 20th century, community-led initiatives have fueled each wave of reform, from labor rights to civil rights, underscoring the power of grassroots efforts to unite citizens around shared causes and tackle pressing issues.
These movements reveal democracy’s fullest expression as a participatory, resilient force rooted in the struggles and dreams of the people. Community organizing exemplifies democracy in action, inviting citizens to transcend the role of spectators and become active participants in shaping their future.
Behind many of America’s transformative reforms lies a powerful yet often overlooked engine of change—grassroots movements. By uniting individuals to advocate for justice, build solidarity and press for reforms, these movements make democracy accessible to all. True democracy isn’t only about casting votes; it’s about communities driving the change they wish to see. When we examine the impact of these movements on American society, we gain a deeper understanding of democracy as a living, evolving process driven by citizens in their pursuit of justice, equality and a more inclusive future.
“Change begins where people gather.” “Democracy is built from below, one community at a time.” These catchphrases encapsulate the core of grassroots movements: democracy in action, powered by ordinary citizens determined to create a more just society. In an era dominated by top-down politics, reclaiming democracy starts in neighborhoods, communities and local organizations—spaces where people come together, share their struggles and organize for change. Unlike politics controlled by elites in state capitals or Washington, community organizing brings power to the people, showing that real change grows from the ground up.
Grassroots movements exemplify participatory democracy at its most authentic. They provide ordinary people with the tools to address issues that institutional politics often ignore, empowering communities to advocate for their own needs and redefine what is possible. By mobilizing collective action, these movements give voice to citizens often sidelined in national debates, proving that democracy’s true strength lies in the commitment of its people to make a difference from below.
Community organizing stands as a powerful counterpoint to top-down approaches, reminding us that meaningful, lasting reform arises when individuals come together, driven by shared values and a commitment to justice. These grassroots efforts are not merely adjuncts to formal political structures; they are the lifeblood of democracy itself, actively building democratic values of participation, equity and solidarity from the ground up. In the hands of committed citizens, grassroots movements become engines of social transformation—one neighborhood, one issue and one victory at a time.
***
Several scholars and activists have explored community organizing and grassroots social movements, analyzing the factors that contribute to their success or failure and the relative strengths of local versus national movements.
Saul Alinsky, often regarded as a pioneer of modern community organizing, focused on empowering disadvantaged urban communities through a pragmatic, adaptable approach. His Rules for Radicals advocates for tactical flexibility, an understanding of power structures and cultivating local leadership. Alinsky argued that successful movements should target winnable issues that directly impact people’s lives, highlighting the effectiveness of local movements, where organizers can connect with communities on a personal level.
Marshall Ganz, who organized with the United Farm Workers, emphasizes “strategic capacity”—the ability to read the environment, develop innovative strategies and adapt quickly—as essential to effective organizing. In Why David Sometimes Wins, Ganz highlights the importance of narrative framing and relational power, whereby organizers build personal connections to sustain engagement. He argues that grassroots movements have a distinct advantage over national efforts due to their adaptability to local contexts and the personal bonds they foster within communities.
Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, in their analysis of grassroots movements in Poor People’s Movements, contend that the power of grassroots movements lies in their ability to create disruption that pressures elites to make concessions. They caution against early formalization, which can dilute a movement’s flexibility and reduce its impact. According to Piven and Cloward, local movements can be especially powerful by responding spontaneously to injustices, mobilizing quickly and focusing on specific grievances that resonate deeply within communities.
Erica Chenoweth, author of Why Civil Resistance Works, argues that nonviolent movements with broad-based participation are often more successful, particularly when they maintain sustained, strategic disruption. Chenoweth’s research suggests that local movements can be highly effective if they engage diverse community members and maintain pressure over time.
Sara Evans and Harry Boyte, in Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America, argue that community spaces where people can gather independently of the influence of elites or formal institutions—are essential for fostering democratic engagement and social change. These spaces (such as community centers, religious organizations or even informal gatherings) allow people to build relationships, share knowledge and develop a collective identity. They believe that these free spaces empower ordinary citizens, providing them with the skills, confidence and solidarity needed to participate in democratic life and pursue change from the bottom up. Their work stresses the importance of localized, democratic practices and the role of everyday people in sustaining movements.
Paul Almeida’s Social Movements: The Structure of Collective Mobilization examines the structural conditions that enable or constrain social movements. He emphasizes how economic crises, state repression and political shifts can trigger mobilization by creating grievances and perceived threats. He explores how grassroots movements succeed by developing what he calls “social movement organizations” that can sustain participation, recruit new members and expand their influence. Almeida also discusses the importance of networks in mobilizing resources and building alliances, showing how movements can grow by linking with other groups facing similar issues. His analysis provides insight into how structural factors and organizational strategies shape the effectiveness of grassroots mobilization.
In Practical Radicals, Deepak Bhargava and Stephanie Luce spell out nine actionable strategies for building powerful and sustainable movements. They argue that grassroots movements succeed by combining long-term vision with practical tactics, such as broad-based coalition building, effective messaging and direct action. They stress the importance of inclusivity and cross-class alliances in building a “majoritarian” movement, aiming to unite a diverse set of groups around common goals. Their book emphasizes pragmatic, flexible approaches that adapt to the specific needs and political climate of each movement, advocating for a balance between grassroots pressure and institutional engagement to achieve concrete wins while building lasting power.
In No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age, Jane F. McAlevey critiques what she terms “mobilizing”—short-term efforts to turn out support for events or petitions—and advocates instead for “deep organizing.” She argues that true social change requires extensive base-building efforts that prioritize relational organizing and develop leadership from within communities. She stresses the importance of engaging people as active participants rather than passive supporters and emphasizes the role of strategic strikes, especially within labor movements, as effective tools for empowering workers. Her focus is on creating movements that build power from the ground up, fostering a strong, democratic base with the capacity to sustain itself over time and confront powerful adversaries.
Together, these scholars suggest several overarching principles about grassroots and national movements:
- A hybrid strategy combines local agility with national influence. Local and national movements each bring unique strengths to social change. Local movements, as Alinsky and Ganz argue, have the advantage of agility and deep community connections, which allow them to respond quickly to local needs, foster trust and mobilize around immediate, relevant issues. They often serve as “laboratories” for new strategies, testing approaches that can later be scaled nationally. National movements, by contrast, can command media attention, shape policy and mobilize resources at a broader level—benefits that are vital for systemic change. However, as Piven and Cloward note, national movements may struggle to maintain grassroots engagement and can be hindered by bureaucratic rigidity. Movements like the civil rights movement and contemporary environmental movements have effectively combined both approaches, harnessing local organizing power while leveraging national resources to create widespread, sustained impact.
- Success lies in balancing immediate mobilization with long-term vision and adaptability. Successful movements are strategically flexible, capable of adapting to evolving circumstances and resonate with the lived experiences of participants. Relational power and community involvement are central, as they help sustain momentum and build a supportive base. Successful movements also balance disruption with institution-building to create lasting impact. In contrast, unsuccessful movements often lean too heavily on bureaucratic structures, which can stifle responsiveness and alienate potential supporters. They may overemphasize ideology or pursue goals disconnected from the needs of the communities they claim to represent.
Together, these insights underscore that grassroots movements are a powerful force for participatory democracy and social reform, particularly when they are able to combine the localized strength of community organizing with the scale of national movements. By understanding the dynamics of both local and national organizing, activists can foster movements that are resilient, inclusive and impactful, bridging the divide between everyday experiences and larger societal transformations.
In their influential 2021 call for action, Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty-First-Century America, Hahrie Han, Elizabeth McKenna and Michelle Oyakawa examine the factors that enable grassroots movements to drive social change effectively. Their research identifies key strategies that distinguish successful movements from those that struggle to make an impact.
Successful movements share several core strategies:
- Transformative organizing: Effective movements act as “prisms of the people,” transforming individual participation into collective power. This involves engaging members deeply, fostering leadership from within and building an organizational structure that amplifies the voices and concerns of its constituents.
- Strategic capacity: Successful movements are adaptable, able to analyze power dynamics, set clear goals and adjust tactics as needed. This strategic flexibility allows them to navigate complex political landscapes and respond effectively to changing circumstances.
- Relational power: Building strong relationships within the community and with allies is essential. By cultivating trust and solidarity, movements can mobilize resources, coordinate actions and sustain long-term engagement and commitment.
- Narrative framing: Crafting narratives that resonate with broader societal values is critical for gaining public support. By framing issues in ways that connect with people’s lived experiences and aspirations, movements can shift public discourse and shape policy debates.
In contrast, less effective movements often rely on unsuccessful strategies, including:
- Transactional mobilization: Movements that focus solely on short-term mobilization without investing in a strong organizational foundation often struggle to achieve lasting impact. While they may see temporary participation spikes, they lack the depth needed to sustain engagement or drive systemic change.
- Lack of internal democracy: Organizations that do not foster inclusive decision-making risk alienating members and weakening internal cohesion. Without democratic practices, movements may lose legitimacy and see diminished engagement.
- Overreliance on charismatic leadership: While charismatic leaders can galvanize action, movements that rely too heavily on individual figures are at risk if those leaders depart. Building collective leadership ensures continuity and resilience.
By prioritizing transformative organizing, strategic adaptability, relational power and effective narrative framing, grassroots movements strengthen their capacity to achieve meaningful social change and avoid common pitfalls.
Grassroots organizing has historically been associated with left-wing and progressive causes, from labor and civil rights to environmental and LGBTQ+ movements. These movements sought to expand rights, push for social justice and challenge established power structures.
However, in recent years, moral and political conservatives have increasingly adopted grassroots strategies to influence local government, especially in areas like school boards and city councils. This shift challenges the traditional understanding of grassroots movements as inherently liberal or radical forces and shows that grassroots organizing can be a powerful tool for both conservative and progressive agendas.
Conservative grassroots movements have gained traction in several key areas. Perhaps most prominently, they have successfully mobilized around education, specifically through school boards. Across the United States, conservative groups have campaigned to elect school board members who oppose certain curricula, such as those that include race, sex education or progressive interpretations of American history.
These grassroots efforts have pushed for changes in school policies, curriculum oversight and even book bans, arguing that they are protecting traditional values and parental rights. For example, in Texas, Florida and Virginia, conservative-backed candidates have won school board seats, subsequently shaping the policies and curriculum standards of local schools. The 2021 Virginia gubernatorial race brought national attention to parental rights in education, and conservative grassroots organizations played a key role in mobilizing support around these issues, demonstrating the local impact of coordinated organizing efforts.
Another arena where conservative grassroots organizing has made significant inroads is in the realm of public health and local governance. During the COVID-19 pandemic, conservative activists in various states organized protests and filed legal challenges against mask mandates, business closures and vaccine requirements. These activists worked to influence county health boards and local government policies, emphasizing personal liberty and limited government.
Organizations like Moms for Liberty, which initially focused on school-related issues, expanded their reach to other aspects of public policy, demonstrating how grassroots conservative activism is expanding its focus.
Conservative grassroots organizing has also embraced social media and digital platforms to build communities and share strategies. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram and local news forums have become powerful tools for mobilizing conservative activists. For instance, groups like Turning Point USA and local conservative networks use social media to galvanize supporters, provide training in grassroots tactics and organize events.
By focusing on local issues, these groups have successfully tapped into the frustrations and anxieties of community members, using digital strategies to rapidly build networks of like-minded individuals.
Just as left-leaning movements historically used grassroots organizing to disrupt the status quo, conservative movements are now leveraging the same strategies to defend or re-establish traditional values within their communities, demonstrating that grassroots efforts are not tied to a single political orientation.
Moreover, the success of conservative grassroots activism has led to a more complex understanding of how grassroots movements can shape policy and public opinion from the bottom up. Whereas progressive movements often position themselves as pushing against established power structures for greater inclusivity and reform, conservative grassroots movements often frame their efforts as defending communities against outside forces or government overreach.
This framing has resonated deeply with supporters who feel that national trends or elite opinions are out of step with local values. As a result, grassroots organizing has proven to be a flexible vehicle that can serve the interests of any group willing to build a community network, mobilize local support and actively engage in local governance.
This shift in grassroots activism complicates our understanding of participatory democracy, showing that local organizing has the power to influence society’s values, norms and policies, whether it aims for social transformation or the preservation of tradition. The rising success of conservative grassroots efforts is a reminder that community-led organizing remains one of the most potent forces in American politics, capable of reshaping both local and national landscapes.
Grassroots movements remind us that democracy is not a fixed institution; it is a living, evolving process powered by the voices, actions and aspirations of the people. Community organizing amplifies those voices from the ground up, creating spaces for genuine reform and empowering individuals to shape the future of their communities. These movements reveal that the true work of democracy often begins not in the halls of power but in the streets, neighborhoods and gathering places where ordinary people join forces to build a better world.
The enduring impact of grassroots activism lies in its ability to harness collective power for real, lasting change. By looking to these movements as examples of democracy in action, we witness the potential for ordinary citizens to reshape society, affirming that democratic participation doesn’t start or end at the ballot box; it is a continuous process that thrives on the commitment and courage of the people themselves.
Grassroots organizing exemplifies the essence of participatory democracy, offering communities a pathway to assert their power and define their futures. At a time of increased polarization, these movements model unity, purpose and democratic engagement, reminding us of the power people wield when they act collectively.
Their legacy shows that lasting social transformation grows from the grassroots, where citizens work to address the issues that matter most to them. By studying these movements, we can begin to understand democracy itself—messy, dynamic and continually reborn through people’s collective will.
