The University of Connecticut men’s basketball team will have to sit out the 2012-13 postseason, after it failed in its final effort to appeal a National Collegiate Athletic Association decision that banned the team from the tournament because of poor academic performance. The team is ineligible because it didn’t reach the (newly raised) minimum NCAA Academic Progress Rate of 930, which would indicate that half its players were on track to graduate. That measurement is a cumulative one, meaning the APR that got Connecticut banned from the 2013 tournament actually reflects the academic performance of players on the team from 2007-11. Connecticut appealed to an NCAA committee after its initial request for a waiver was denied in February.
The university issued a statement Thursday pointing to the improved academic performance of its past two men’s basketball teams. “It is disturbing that our current players must pay a penalty for the academic performance of students no longer enrolled,” Connecticut President Susan Herbst said in the statement. “As I have said repeatedly, no educator or parent purposefully punishes young people for the failings of others.”
This is the first year the NCAA has issued postseason bans for poor APR scores. The new rule is part of a series of Division I reform efforts that NCAA President Mark Emmert pushed through in October.
- NCAA postseason bans for poor academic performance continue to rise, especially at HBCUs
- NCAA bans teams from postseason for low APR scores
- NCAA Levies Academic Penalties
- NCAA Academic Metric Hits HBCUs
- 21 of 24 Division I historically black colleges face possible postseason bans in 2016
- Gap in academic spending for athletes begs for more support for low-performing teams at low-resource colleges
- The 2012 NCAA March Madness Academic Performance Tournament
- Who would win the NCAA tournament if the games were decided by academic performance?
Search for Jobs