A study released Wednesday by Policy Matters Ohio, a nonpartisan think tank, found that deregulating the governance structure of public higher education institutions -- a primary component of Ohio Governor John Kasich's higher education agenda -- doesn't have a significant effect on outcomes such as enrollment, graduation rate and the number of low-income students who graduate, but could lead to higher tuition rates, at least in the states examined. The study looked at three classes of institutions: "highly deregulated" (Virginia and Colorado), "partially deregulated" (Illinois, New Jersey and Texas), and "coordinated" (Kentucky, Maryland and Minnesota) and compared their outcomes to that of the nation and Ohio over the past decade.
"Given the track record of deregulation in other states, we have little reason to think that this approach will make tuition more affordable, increase access for low- and moderate-income students, or increase graduation rates," the report's authors write. "The primary factor affecting access and affordability is state support for higher education and state targeting of support for low- and moderate-income families."
The report's authors readily acknowledge that most of the deregulation took place about halfway through the decade and that confounding variables in the states selected might have an effect on the overall outcomes.
- Several ballot measures could have significant impact on higher ed this November
- New report on debt and class of 2011
- A new academic underclass: the adjunct committee member (essay)
- Educause, Gates Unveil Grants for 'Breakthrough' Models
- Constance Gee publishes memoir on time as first lady at Ohio State, Brown, Vanderbilt
- NYU announces changes to its law school curriculum
- Divided appeals court refuses to reconsider decision on graduate student's lawsuit
- Innovation Overload
Search for Jobs