Giving students and parents targeted information about colleges' pricing and outcomes is a worthy goal that could improve their decision-making about higher education, the Center for American Progress says in a report released today. But the federal government's process for developing its "College Scorecard" has fallen well short in practice, says the report, which offers a slew of recommendations for how the government could rework the document, particularly with advice from actual consumers. Among the report's findings are that the government should: test ways of communicating the concept of “net price”; emphasize four-year graduation rates, not six-year rates, if further testing confirms that the shorter time-frame is more relevant to students’ decision-making; and develop alternative measures of student debt that matter to students if further testing confirms that traditional measures such as repayment rate or default rate are not meaningful to students.
- White House's new scorecard oversimplifies institutions, liberal arts advocates say
- Quick Takes: Israel Reconsiders Ban on Gaza Students' Travel, Oregon State Drops Italian, Med Schools Ranked on Ethics, Rosemont to Go Fully Coed, Shifting History Specializations, SAGE Buys CQ Press, Rejected Ph.D. Candidate Sues
- California community colleges release completion scorecards
- Public universities propose alternative to Obama ratings plan
- What we don't know about college student debt
Search for Jobs
Popular Job Categories