The Law School Admission Council has sued the state of California over a new law barring the council from alerting law schools that applicants have received extra time on the Law School Admission Test, The National Law Journal reported. Supporters of the new law and advocates for people with disabilities say that time extensions are an appropriate tool to help people with some disabilities, and that their scores should not be called into question through "flagging" them, as the process is known. But the Law School Admission Council's suit charges that California is violating the group's First Amendment rights by controlling what it says. Further, the suit says that the law inappropriately focuses on only the LSAT and not other standardized tests that may use flagging.
- Law school group agrees to stop flagging scores of students who get extra time due to disabilities
- Judge Challenges MCAT Rules
- Appeals Court Rejects Use of State Law to Demand Time Extensions on MCAT
- A Crack in the Dominance of the LSAT?
- Appeals court rejects suit by ex-student against medical school
- Building a Better Admissions Test
- ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement
- Admissions leaders and legal experts debate how to define merit
Search for Jobs