A federal appeals court has partially revived a whistle-blower lawsuit against several student loan providers accused of improperly inflating their portfolios to obtain higher subsidies from the Education Department.
The case, brought by on Jon H. Oberg, a former Education Department researcher, alleges that a handful of lenders took advantage of a loophole in federal law to collect hundreds of millions of dollars in excess federal subsidies.
On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that a lower court erred in dismissing the lawsuit against two of the defendants: the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency and the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation. The district court will now have to reconsider whether the case against them can proceed.
But the court also upheld the lower court’s decision to dismiss the suit against the Arkansas Student Loan Authority, concluding that the loan provider was clearly a state entity and therefore can not be sued under the False Claims Act.
Four of the other lenders involved in the case collectively paid $57.8 million in 2010 to resolve their part of the lawsuit.
- Appeals court says borrowers can sue major student loan agency
- Appeals Court Revives Suit Against Harvard-Affiliated Teaching Hospitals
- House subcommittee approves bill that would cut NSF social science research
- 4 Lenders Settle Lawsuit Over Use of Student Loan Loophole
- Northwestern Prof Accused of Assault Won't Teach in Spring
- Details of gainful employment proposal expected Friday
- Cautionary words about academic productivity and the problem of hyperactivity (essay)
- Appeals Court Backs Dismissal of Whistleblower Suit Against Lenders
Search for Jobs