The University of Pittsburgh did not violate a professor's right to due process or deprive him of a property right when it reduced his base salary because of consistently poor performance reviews, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in overturning a lower court's decision.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the lower court's view that Pitt's policy on faculty compensation entitled Jerome McKinney, a tenured professor at Pitt’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, to maintain his base salary. While the university's policy neither makes clear that a professor's salary can be reduced nor that it cannot be lowered, the appeals panel said, there isn't nearly enough justification for the court to “wade into the realm of ‘academic decisionmaking,’” for which it is “particularly ill-equipped.”
You must verify your email address before signing in. Check your email for your verification email, or enter your email address in the form below to resend the email.
We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.
Create New Password
This email address was registered with a social account. We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password, which can be used in addition to your linked social providers.
Expand commentsHide comments — Join the conversation!