The University of Pittsburgh did not violate a professor's right to due process or deprive him of a property right when it reduced his base salary because of consistently poor performance reviews, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in overturning a lower court's decision.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the lower court's view that Pitt's policy on faculty compensation entitled Jerome McKinney, a tenured professor at Pitt’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, to maintain his base salary. While the university's policy neither makes clear that a professor's salary can be reduced nor that it cannot be lowered, the appeals panel said, there isn't nearly enough justification for the court to “wade into the realm of ‘academic decisionmaking,’” for which it is “particularly ill-equipped.”
Opinions on Inside Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed’s Blog U
Inside Higher Ed Careers
Hiring? Post A Job Today!
Browse Faculty Jobs
Browse Administrative Jobs
Browse Executive Administration Jobs
College Pages
Popular Right Now
Federal Student Aid COO resigns; FAFSA has technical difficulties
Senate approves $40 billion for colleges
Long-term online learning in pandemic may impact students' well-being
NACAC creates commission to look at the admissions process, with a focus on race
8 Ways to Improve Your Online Course | Higher Ed Gamma
Reimagining the new post-pandemic roles university systems can play (opinion)
Senate Passes Bill Targeting Confucius Institutes
Common Application data show most applicants are not submitting test scores
Seven recommendations for helping students thrive in times of trauma
Expand commentsHide comments