How to Prevent Votes of No Confidence

New York division of AAUP prepares template for professors to be truly involved in institutional decision-making.

June 17, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Seeking to add “teeth” to the growing number of faculty votes of no confidence in presidents, the New York State Conference of the American Association of University Professors on Saturday unveiled its “Profile for 21st Century President” to serve as a template for future presidential searches.

“Under the principles of shared governance, even where primary responsibility  rests with one of the other institutional components, the faculty should be afforded a meaningful participatory role in the significant decision-making processes affecting the future well-being of the institution,” reads the document, which was presented as a resolution at the annual meeting of the national AAUP.

Under the template, faculty members would have the right to:

  • Define and shape all new academic and curricular initiatives, including those at global locations.
  • Be represented on the governing board.
  • Participate meaningfully in the selection of new presidents and provosts.
  • Have full knowledge of the fiscal of the affairs of the institution.
  • Review and participate in the approval of all new building and expansion plans.
  • Extensions of the protections of academic freedom for all faculty members, including adjuncts, direction and dealings with faculty.

“In New York City as a whole we’ve see a vote of no confidence ‘spring,’” said Andrew Ross, professor of social and cultural analysis at New York University said, referring to votes at his institution and others at the City University of New York, where faculty have rallied against the general education system Pathways. But such votes essentially are “empty” and “needed accompanying talking points,” he said. “Rather than hand of the ‘red [AAUP policy] book’ to faculty, this is a ‘one-stop’ sheet on the faculty role in governance.”

The profile is serves as template, Ross added, so that institutions can amend it to fit their needs. AAUP members passed the resolution presented after Hank Reichman, national first vice president, reiterated that the vote signified only the recognition of the state conference’s action – not AAUP’s adoption of the template.

“The floor of the membership meeting isn’t the wisest place to make AAUP policy,” he said.

Rudy Fichtenbaum, AAUP president and professor of economics at Wright State University, said he wasn’t intimately familiar with the resolution, as it hadn’t come to the floor through the body’s resolution committee. But he said it reflected a general feeling “all over that administrations and boards are usurping the rights and responsibilities of the faculty to control curriculum” and other things within their purview.

The resolution seemed to be a way of fighting back, he said.

Share Article

Colleen Flaherty

Colleen Flaherty, Reporter, covers faculty issues for Inside Higher Ed. Prior to joining the publication in 2012, Colleen was military editor at the Killeen Daily Herald, outside Fort Hood, Texas. Before that, she covered government and land use issues for the Greenwich Time and Hersam Acorn Newspapers in her home state of Connecticut. After graduating from McGill University in Montreal in 2005 with a degree in English literature, Colleen taught English and English as a second language in public schools in the Bronx, N.Y. She earned her M.S.Ed. from City University of New York Lehman College in 2008 as part of the New York City Teaching Fellows program. 

Back to Top