Filter & Sort
Woman excitedly discussing new project with colleagues

Advice on Selecting Service Opportunities

Steve Baule describes some service options that might be available to new faculty members and provides advice on those they may want to consider.

Woman standing on a ledge holds briefcase and looks through spyglass at mountain beside her with flag on top but now way to get across to it

Academic Hybrid Positions and the F Word

As administrative scholars become more prominent across campuses, who should be considered capital-F Faculty, Chelsea Brislin asks, and what opportunities should be extended to them?

Illustration: Two women scientists working at a table, one looking through a microscope

Increasing Women’s Representation in STEM Fields

Leaders in academe hold several keys to correct the well-documented tendency to undervalue women’s work, writes Nina Gray.

Man sits working on computer in middle of network of hubs

Helping Faculty Increase Their Research Impact

Publicly sharing research with future readers and collaborators can significantly increase publication and presentation opportunities, writes Christine Tulley.

Lone woman walks with back to viewer in a futuristic room

On ChatGPT: Confessions of an Anonymous Lecturer

I can’t stop students from cheating, they write, so is it even worth it to try—especially when I’m so overworked and underpaid?

Black magnifying glass, eyeglasses and pen sit on papers with charts and graphs

When the Little Things Matter

Getting your research published can feel overwhelming, writes Natalie Schriefer, who offers editing tips about references, citations, charts and formats to help you feel more confident submitting.

hand paging through a guidebook

Guidance for an Often Thankless Task

Laura L. Behling gives advice for revising the Faculty Handbook, which can be challenging and take longer than hoped but is nevertheless crucial for faculty and institutions alike.

The Tenure and Promotion Process, Reimagined

How, Deborah J. Cohan asks, can academe make it more productive, meaningful and streamlined for everyone—including the candidate, the reviewers and the institution?