Skip to main content
Home
  • Search
  • Search
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Become a Member
  • Find A Job
  • Solutions
    • Advertising & Marketing
    • Consulting Services
    • Data & Insights
    • Hiring & Jobs
    • Event Partnerships
    • Campus+
    • Menu
    • Find a Job
    • Become a Member
    • Sign up for Newsletters
    • News
    • Faculty Issues
      • Contingent Faculty
      • Curriculum
      • Teaching
      • Learning & Assessment
      • Diversity & Equity
      • Career Development
      • Tenure
      • Retirement
      • Labor & Unionization
      • Shared Governance
      • Academic Freedom
      • Research
      • Books & Publishing
    • Students
      • Academics
      • Graduate students and Postdocs
      • Retention
      • Financial Aid
      • Careers
      • Residential Life
      • Athletics
      • Free Speech
      • Diversity
      • Physical & Mental Health
      • Safety
    • Diversity
      • Race & Ethnicity
      • Sex & Gender
      • Socioeconomics
      • Religion
      • Disability
      • Age
    • Admissions
      • Traditional-Age
      • Adult & Post-Traditional
      • Transfer
      • Graduate
    • Tech & Innovation
      • Teaching & Learning
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Digital Publishing
      • Data Analytics
      • Libraries
      • Administrative Tech
      • Alternative Credentials
    • Business
      • Financial Health
      • Cost-Cutting
      • Revenue Strategies
      • Academic Programs
      • Physical Campuses
      • Mergers & Collaboration
      • Fundraising
    • Institutions
      • Research Universities
      • Regional Public Universities
      • Community Colleges
      • Private Nonprofit Colleges
      • Minority-Serving Institutions
      • Religious Colleges
      • Women's Colleges
      • Specialized Colleges
      • For-Profit Colleges
    • Governance
      • Executive Leadership
      • Trustees & Regents
      • State Oversight
      • Accreditation
    • Government
      • Politics & Elections
      • Supreme Court
      • Student Aid Policy
      • Science & Research Policy
      • State Policy
      • Colleges & Localities
    • Workplace
      • Employee Satisfaction
      • Remote & Flexible Work
      • Staff Issues
    • Global
      • Study Abroad
      • International Students in U.S.
      • U.S. Colleges in the World
    • Opinion
    • Views
      • Intellectual Affairs
    • Career Advice
      • Conditionally Accepted
      • Seeking a Faculty Job
      • Advancing in the Faculty
      • Teaching
      • Seeking an Administrative Job
      • Advancing as an Administrator
      • Diversity
      • Carpe Careers
    • Columns
      • Alma Mater
      • Beyond Transfer
      • Blog U Special: Apple's Announcement
      • College Ready Writing
      • Construction Trumps Disruption
      • Conversations on Diversity
      • Digital Tweed
      • Education in the Time of Corona
      • Getting to Green
      • GlobalHigherEd
      • GradHacker
      • Hack (Higher) Education
      • Higher Ed Mash Up
      • Library Babel Fish
      • Mama PhD
      • Minor Details
      • Peaks and Valleys
      • Prose and Purpose
      • Reality Check
      • Rethinking Higher Education
      • Sounding Board
      • Statehouse Test
      • Student Affairs and Technology
      • The Education of Oronte Churm
      • The World View
      • University Diaries
      • Call to Action
      • Confessions of a Community College Dean
      • Higher Ed Gamma
      • Higher Ed Policy
      • Just Explain It to Me!
      • Just Visiting
      • Law, Policy—and IT?
      • Leadership & StratEDgy
      • Leadership in Higher Education
      • Learning Innovation
      • Online: Trending Now
      • Rethinking Research Communication
      • -------------
      • Resident Scholar
      • University of Venus
    • Letters
    • Opinion
    • Hubs
    • Student Success
      • Student Voice
      • Academic Life
      • Health & Wellness
      • The College Experience
      • Life After College
    • Special
    • Podcasts
      • The Key
      • Academic Minute
      • Campus
      • The Pulse
      • Weekly Wisdom
    • Reports & Data
    • Events
    • Quick Takes
    • Solutions
    • Advertising & Marketing
    • Consulting Services
    • Data & Insights
    • Hiring & Jobs
    • Event Partnerships
    • Campus+
    • More
    • Post a Job
    • Campus
    • About
    • Contact Us
Insider Dashboard
  • About Membership
  • The Sandbox
  • Webcasts
  • Reports
  • About Membership
  • The Sandbox
  • Webcasts
  • Reports

This resource is available only to Insider members

The Sandbox newsletter is an exclusive benefit of our paid Insider membership. Insiders have access to a unique blend of exclusive data, analysis and emerging best practices. Explore the member benefits here.

September 02, 2023

Survey Says...

A recent survey confused us. Can you explain what we're missing?

By  Rachel Toor

The Sandbox

Inside Higher Ed Insider
Illustration of leaders focused on plans and data while a wall collapses on them.

We Are Perplexed

When Inside Higher Ed surveyed presidents last spring, 80 percent felt good about the financial stability and future of their institutions. One president I asked about this, who did not fill out the survey, said of her colleagues: “They’re on crack.”

Three months later, only two-thirds of chief budget officers IHE surveyed were similarly optimistic.

Are we reading the same news, looking at the same data, living on the same planet?

To us, the presidents’ views don’t reflect today’s demographic and economic realities.

Is this because:

  1. Leaders must be true believers and can’t afford to doubt.
  2. We at Inside Higher Ed are looking at the wrong things.
  3. You’re lying to us because you don’t want to yell “fire” and scare off your students and employees.
  4. You’re kidding yourselves.
  5. You’re too busy trying to reach Genius in Spelling Bee to fill out surveys.

Perhaps it’s natural to believe that things will get better, especially for those who began their careers during the go-go 1990s and 2000s when growth was the word in higher education. But external factors like (and here comes the list you're familiar with): the pending decline in Americans of traditional college age, inflationary-fueled rising costs, eroding public confidence in the perceived value of college, and the central role higher education is now playing in the culture wars seem to be pointing to decidedly not-so-sunny skies.

One long-time higher ed observer concerned about the survey results said, “A failure to acknowledge that the world is different, that we’re not ‘going back’ to the days when many/most colleges had enough students coming through the doors to sustain them open-endedly, may mean that leaders aren’t asking hard-enough questions internally about what their institutions need to do differently to ensure they’ll be sustainable for the long haul. And if they don’t start thinking about those things now, if they keep kicking the can down the road, many more of them will be in a world of hurt financially.”

What percentage of colleges will merge, close or otherwise disappear in the coming decade? Predictions vary from single digits to as high as a third. But most believe their own institution will be an outlier in the trend line. Are leaders and their teams really as confident as they say they are?

Is everyone but us living in Lake Wobegon, where all the children are above average, and all the colleges can grow their way out of a daunting demographic and financial environment?

If you’re a college leader and you believe there are in fact deep, systemic problems, what are you doing differently? Are you looking hard at evidence and data and your own situation and thinking realistically about a strategy that will help you beat the odds? Playing just enough defense to beat the competition? Or hanging tight until you can retire?

It's higher ed finance in 2023. Let's talk about it. For real.

We Asked a Few People for Their Take

A current president (10 years at two institutions):

The reality is presidents have to be optimists—and not just externally for PR purposes. Internally for self-preservation too. While logically, we all understand that our control is limited, that does not stop some presidents from feeling everything is their fault – especially the failures. The freshman class was too small? I should have pushed harder on the discount rate or made changes in our enrollment leadership. The big gift doesn’t come through? They must not have faith in me and my leadership. Faculty are upset about lack of raises? I am failing as a leader.

So, how does one survive when the psychological impacts of organizational failure are felt personally? You must believe that failures are passing—flukes that will quickly be corrected in the next cycle. And that leads directly to strategic plans, enrollment projections, and budget forecasts that are cockeyed in their optimism. These “everything will be fine in two years” planning processes often forestall the tough choices necessary to sustain the institution. Deficits run on for years, reserves are eaten up, and eventually the institution succumbs to the real failure—to face reality.

A former president (until 2021) offers some ways current leaders may be thinking:

  • We were on a good path but a tight budget before the pandemic. Post-pandemic the budget is even tighter, and progress on our vision was set back. Can we account for new realities without losing the confidence of the campus? Instead of thriving, we are just managing to stay afloat. How long can I ask people to tolerate austerity? What are the consequences if I don't?
  • If we pursue a merger, it may save the college, but once we pursue it, that’s all we would be doing and talking about. The results of others trying this are not encouraging. When do I know whether it’s worth the risk (including to my job) of pursuing a merger?
  • Every time a new possibility emerges (partnering with OPMs, working with an online college, creating cross-institutional partnerships) it seems like the Education Department and accreditors get involved and new regulations could wipe out everything we’re trying to do. How do we understand not just the current risks, but the likelihood of future problems?
  • We read about new partnerships in the higher ed media, but then we don’t know much about whether or how they work, we just get an article about the initial announcement and the rosy press release hype. Are these all arrangements of financial convenience, or is there more to it?
  • What’s the deal with big public universities acquiring online institutions, sometimes for-profit ones? Does this change the competitive landscape for the rest of us? Is it a game only the big R1 schools can play, or should we be pursuing this, too?
  • Okay, the high tuition-high financial aid model of operating a private institution doesn't work any more. But the only alternative I've seen is a tuition reset, which uses the same model and just lowers the published rate, and its track record is mixed. Does anyone have a viable idea of how to actually restructure this system? Is anybody even working on it, or do they just keep telling us it is unsustainable? Because I know that already, I just don't know what else to do.
  • I get that change is necessary, but it’s also risky. It’s easy to take risks when you have resources, but hard when things are so tight. Does anyone have reasonable (not self-promoting) guidance about how to evaluate the likely success of different strategies (curriculum change, eliminating the liberal arts, course sharing, new programs, etc.)? I don’t think we’re going under in the next year or two, but we also can’t afford to hemorrhage much longer or invest in the wrong thing. How do we identify ideas that might turn things around? It feels like we only have one chance to get this right before we’re in real trouble.

From a former president (until 2021) who has written widely about higher ed:

In 1981, a Swedish study looked at how people rated their driving abilities. Everyone surveyed was an experienced driver. They were overly optimistic while certainly being aware of ‘average’ drivers. Yet, they consistently viewed themselves as somehow apart, different, and ultimately superior.

I think that is what is occurring in higher ed. It probably speaks to our inherent superiority as a profession. We call each other Doctor, Professor, Dean, Provost, and President X and routinely march around wearing flamboyant robes derived from the Middle Ages. Even medical doctors wear simple white coats and federal judges wear simple black robes. That may have something to do with it.

We’re at a point at which families and students can no longer afford higher education (a multi-generational disaster that could affect the destiny of our country in this century and beyond). It is a five-alarm fire that will require a national response. Higher ed leaders should, at least, know that it is happening.

I once elicited a very genuine response at a presidents' meeting. We were asked what kept us up at night (this was before COVID-19). I said it was projecting hope and optimism to the faculty, staff, trustees, and alumni when I doubted that optimism was warranted. Two presidents looked at me and said, “I can't believe that you just said that. I feel it every day.”

From a current president (a dozen years at two institutions):

You have captured the combination of “see no evil” and “Dunning Kruger” that is occurring. The challenges of being in an idiocracy are, of course, profound and your speculation of a negative response, inclusive of no response, is plausible.

A current chancellor:

The public nature of public university board meetings makes candid conversation and scenario exploration difficult. If I mention fiscal scenarios I'm exploring, you know how much flak from the media, the union, and other groups I will receive? How fast different campus interest groups will start organizing to block and sabotage anything that might be on the menu for change?

You spend 6-8 months getting beat up as you discuss/engage shared governance stakeholders, getting morale to the floor to then have some deal cut in the legislature that saves the day (or most of the day). Patterns like this make people very cynical and in the process, you destroy trust and morale.

From a former president (until 2021):

I think different types of presidents respond to the financial headwinds in different ways, and the survey is linear, which makes it hard to answer why people responded the way they did. But if you think about how different presidents approach these issues, it may give some insight into their answers. Here are some presidential prototypes in relation to financial pressures:

The Emergency Room Technician: “It’s a crisis! Kill tenure! Eliminate programs! Lay off staff! And for goodness sake, quit using colored printer ink!”

The Transplant Surgeon/$6 Million Man Fan: “We can do this. We can rebuild. We will make it better than it was before...Bigger. Stronger. Wealthier. We will carefully extract the liberal arts and deftly remove tenure. Then we will implant health sciences and STEM programs, perhaps even add more online programs. The patient will go through shock and may be in ICU for a while and will have a pig’s heart, but the patient will survive and thrive again.”

The Sports Booster: “We’ll add more sports! We'll give the mascot and our uniforms a makeover! We'll move to Division I (or II)! Students love to play sports! Students love to watch sports! Alumni love to follow sports! People give money to sports! Our coaches will be additional admissions officers! We'll win a national championship!”

The Condescender From the Wealthy Outlier: “It’s really unfortunate so many campuses are struggling. I will help by offering completely irrelevant advice from my position of extreme wealth. But I certainly can't offer any money.”

The Man/Woman/Other with a Plan: “Yes, we've had 3 years of deficits and are looking at 3 more, but we’re partnering with OPMs, we're reaching out to new areas of the country, we’re adding new programs in data analytics/ health sciences/other trendy field. Students are going to flock to us soon! Trust me!”

The Field of Dreams President: “I know there is no money, but we must build anyway. High tech buildings, endowed faculty, new programs, visiting scholars. If you look like you're wealthy, you will become wealthy. Build it and the money will follow.”

The Avuncular Philosopher: “Yes, it's a little challenging right now, but we've been through tough times before, it will all come right in the end. The rumors of our death are greatly...well, Twain-ish. Have you heard only the Catholic church has survived longer than higher education?”

The Collaborator: “Many heads are better than a few. Partnerships are better than going it alone. Anyone want to share some back office services?”

What are your (honest and complicated) feelings about your institution's financial prospects?

Email us

The Litter Box

We believe in diversity, equity, and inclusion. We believe in access. We know the field isn’t level but think everyone should get to play—not just those with pedigrees and good breeding but also the scrappier ones who may have had a rougher start in life. This applies to institutions (community colleges as well as research universities), leaders (the Ivy-all-the-ways and those who came from less “traditional” backgrounds), and our pets.

Here we feature the animals who are part of our families. This is the only place where Insiders can show their snouts (whiskers, beaks) wearing institutional affiliations or school colors.

Harry

Harry Carroll Toor, co-founder

Truro

Truro Scharf-Lederman, co-founder

The Sandbox

Not your typical weekly newsletter. This is a space where presidents and chancellors can say what they really think without fear. Everyone is welcome to read, but only those who have been in the top job can submit to us. The Sandbox, by Rachel Toor, is an exclusive benefit of our paid Insider membership program.

 

 

The Sandbox Archive

The Price of Glory

June 7, 2025

When the President (or Chancellor) Is Your Spouse (or Mom)

May 31, 2025

‘Disruptive Without Being Destructive’

May 24, 2025

Letters From Presidents to Higher Ed Critics

May 17, 2025

‘President Resigns Abruptly’

May 10, 2025
View All
Advertisement

Company

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Work with Us
  • History
  • Meet the Team
  • Advertise
  • Find a Job
  • Post a Job

Legal

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Privacy

Newsletter

Sign up for Newsletters

Group
Higher Education News, Opinion and Careers | Weekdays
Quick Summary of the Week's Higher Ed News | Fridays
Admissions and Enrollment News, Opinion and Careers | Mondays
Diversity News, Opinion and Career Advice | Tuesdays
Student Success News, Ideas, Advice and Inspiration | Wednesdays
Expert advice on how to succeed professionally | Thursdays

Copyright © 2025 Inside Higher Ed All rights reserved. | Website designed by nclud

  • Menu
  • Find a Job
  • Become a Member
  • Sign up for Newsletters
  • News
    • Student Success
      • Academic Life
      • Health & Wellness
      • The College Experience
      • Life After College
  • Faculty Issues
    • Contingent Faculty
    • Curriculum
    • Teaching
    • Learning & Assessment
    • Diversity & Equity
    • Career Development
    • Tenure
    • Retirement
    • Labor & Unionization
    • Shared Governance
    • Academic Freedom
    • Research
    • Books & Publishing
  • Students
    • Academics
    • Graduate students and Postdocs
    • Retention
    • Financial Aid
    • Careers
    • Residential Life
    • Athletics
    • Free Speech
    • Diversity
    • Physical & Mental Health
    • Safety
  • Diversity
    • Race & Ethnicity
    • Sex & Gender
    • Socioeconomics
    • Religion
    • Disability
    • Age
  • Admissions
    • Traditional-Age
    • Adult & Post-Traditional
    • Transfer
    • Graduate
  • Tech & Innovation
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Digital Publishing
    • Data Analytics
    • Libraries
    • Administrative Tech
    • Alternative Credentials
  • Business
    • Financial Health
    • Cost-Cutting
    • Revenue Strategies
    • Academic Programs
    • Physical Campuses
    • Mergers & Collaboration
    • Fundraising
  • Institutions
    • Research Universities
    • Regional Public Universities
    • Community Colleges
    • Private Nonprofit Colleges
    • Minority-Serving Institutions
    • Religious Colleges
    • Women's Colleges
    • Specialized Colleges
    • For-Profit Colleges
  • Governance
    • Executive Leadership
    • Trustees & Regents
    • State Oversight
    • Accreditation
  • Government
    • Politics & Elections
    • Supreme Court
    • Student Aid Policy
    • Science & Research Policy
    • State Policy
    • Colleges & Localities
  • Workplace
    • Employee Satisfaction
    • Remote & Flexible Work
    • Staff Issues
  • Global
    • Study Abroad
    • International Students in U.S.
    • U.S. Colleges in the World
  • Opinion
  • Views
    • Intellectual Affairs
  • Career Advice
    • Conditionally Accepted
    • Seeking a Faculty Job
    • Advancing in the Faculty
    • Teaching
    • Seeking an Administrative Job
    • Advancing as an Administrator
    • Diversity
    • Carpe Careers
  • Columns
    • Alma Mater
    • Beyond Transfer
    • Blog U Special: Apple's Announcement
    • College Ready Writing
    • Construction Trumps Disruption
    • Conversations on Diversity
    • Digital Tweed
    • Education in the Time of Corona
    • Getting to Green
    • GlobalHigherEd
    • GradHacker
    • Hack (Higher) Education
    • Higher Ed Mash Up
    • Library Babel Fish
    • Mama PhD
    • Minor Details
    • Peaks and Valleys
    • Prose and Purpose
    • Reality Check
    • Rethinking Higher Education
    • Sounding Board
    • Statehouse Test
    • Student Affairs and Technology
    • The Education of Oronte Churm
    • The World View
    • University Diaries
    • Call to Action
    • Confessions of a Community College Dean
    • Higher Ed Gamma
    • Higher Ed Policy
    • Just Explain It to Me!
    • Just Visiting
    • Law, Policy—and IT?
    • Leadership & StratEDgy
    • Leadership in Higher Education
    • Learning Innovation
    • Online: Trending Now
    • Rethinking Research Communication
    • -------------
    • Resident Scholar
    • University of Venus
  • Letters
  • Opinion
    • Archive
  • Hubs
  • Student Success
    • Student Voice
    • Academic Life
    • Health & Wellness
    • The College Experience
    • Life After College
  • Special
  • Podcasts
    • The Key
    • Academic Minute
    • Campus
    • The Pulse
    • Weekly Wisdom
  • Reports & Data
  • Events
  • Quick Takes
  • Solutions
  • Advertising & Marketing
  • Consulting Services
  • Data & Insights
  • Hiring & Jobs
  • Event Partnerships
  • Campus+
  • More
  • Post a Job
  • Campus
  • About
  • Contact Us

4/5 Articles remaining
this month.

Sign up for a free account or log in.