You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.

I recently came across the phrase “Death is not the end.” It wasn’t a reference to the Christian promise of resurrection, but a tagline for zombie movies—those stories of supernaturally reanimated corpses, vampires, ghouls and other creatures that rise from their graves, driven by an unquenchable hunger or excruciating pain.

In today’s world, the phrase “Death is not the end” carries very different connotations than it once did. Traditionally, this expression was rooted in religious or spiritual beliefs, offering comfort in the face of death. For centuries, people found solace in the promise of life beyond the grave, whether through Christian resurrection, reincarnation in Eastern religions or philosophical views framing death as part of a natural cycle. In these contexts, death was not feared as final, but as a gateway to something greater.

However, as society has grown more secular, the spiritual comfort once provided by these traditions has waned. Today, death is mostly defined in scientific terms—as the irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions (cardiopulmonary death) or the irreversible cessation of all brain activity (brain death). These medical definitions are crucial for end-of-life care and organ donation decisions, but they offer little comfort in confronting the existential fear of mortality. Without the metaphysical assurances of the past, many struggle with the finality of death in a secular, scientifically minded society.

In this void, popular culture has reimagined death in a different, often macabre way. The fascination with zombies, vampires and other undead creatures taps into our fears of what happens when death doesn’t bring rest. The phrase “Death is not the end” has become the catchphrase for countless films and books that explore death not as a conclusion, but as a twisted continuation where the dead walk the earth in soulless or monstrous forms.

Zombies, with their mindless hunger for flesh, and vampires, cursed with eternal life and an insatiable thirst for blood, embody a darker relationship with death—one where there is no spiritual transcendence, only endless suffering or predation. These creatures represent the fear not only of death itself but of a death without peace, where the body persists but the soul is lost. In this cultural shift, “Death is not the end” no longer offers comfort, but a grim reminder of our modern discomfort with mortality.


The core appeal of zombie and vampire movies lies in their ability to tap into deep-seated fears, societal anxieties and fantasies that evolve with the times.

At the heart of both genres is a fascination with mortality and the mysteries of what happens after death. Zombies represent a terrifying scenario where the body persists but the soul or consciousness is lost, turning individuals into mindless husks. This evokes fears of losing humanity, individuality and control, along with the primal fear of death itself.

Vampires, by contrast, offer a seductive version of immortality, retaining their personalities but at the cost of becoming predators. This dynamic raises unsettling questions about the price of eternal life and the ethical compromises that accompany it.

Zombie movies often serve as metaphors for societal collapse. Whether caused by a virus, contagion or supernatural force, the zombie apocalypse symbolizes the breakdown of civilization, order and social structures. Survivors must navigate a chaotic world without law or government, reflecting fears of instability, pandemics and war. These narratives also explore human behavior in extreme conditions, examining how individuals respond when morality crumbles—tapping into both our survival instincts and fears of societal disintegration.

Zombies and vampires also play into fears of the other. Zombies, especially, are depicted as faceless, unstoppable hordes threatening to overwhelm the last remnants of humanity. They represent an anonymous, destructive force that erases individuality, creating a visceral sense of dread. Vampires, on the other hand, embody an alluring yet dangerous other, often aristocratic and seductive. Their bite symbolizes contagion and loss of bodily autonomy, evoking fears of illness, infection and the surrender of control.

Zombie narratives often provide a fantasy of empowerment in the face of overwhelming odds. In a world overrun by the undead, characters face impossible challenges yet have the freedom to reinvent themselves as heroes, survivors or leaders in a lawless world. These stories offer escapism and catharsis, allowing viewers to imagine themselves overcoming adversity and emerging victorious.

Vampire stories play on the fantasy of power and control. Vampires possess superhuman abilities, mystery and dominance, offering an escape into a world where normal human limitations are transcended. Their allure lies in the mix of horror and fascination, where the seduction of power conflicts with moral boundaries.

Both zombie and vampire films explore moral ambiguity. In zombie movies, the line between human and monster often blurs, with survivors sometimes becoming as ruthless as the creatures they battle. Ethical dilemmas surrounding survival, sacrifice and human worth frequently surface.

Similarly, vampire narratives explore the moral conflict as vampires wrestle with their predatory nature and a desire to retain their humanity. This inner struggle between desire and morality adds depth to vampire characters, making them tragic figures torn between good and evil, life and death.

These films provide a safe space to confront deep fears about death, disease and societal collapse. They offer audiences a cathartic release of anxiety by presenting extreme scenarios that remain distant from reality. At the same time, these genres frequently engage in social commentary. Zombies have been used as metaphors for consumerism, conformity and environmental destruction, while vampire stories often explore themes like class struggle, sexual repression and addiction. The flexibility of both genres allows filmmakers to address contemporary issues in symbolic, exaggerated ways.

Zombie and vampire movies endure in popularity because they reflect fundamental human fears and desires—about death, identity, survival and power. They allow audiences to explore these anxieties in a fantastical context, offering both horror and empowerment. Whether reflecting societal concerns or providing escapist thrills, these genres remain relevant by adapting to the shifting fears and desires of their time.


Of course, zombie and vampire movies and novels are also deeply tied to themes of sexuality, exploring desire, power and societal taboos in ways that both unsettle and fascinate audiences.

Vampires, in particular, have long been portrayed as highly sexualized figures. The act of drinking blood—often depicted as an intimate, sensual experience—symbolizes sexual desire. Vampires are typically attractive, alluring and dangerous, evoking forbidden sexual fantasies.

In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, for example, the vampire’s bite is a metaphor for sexual penetration and the loss of innocence, with victims, often women, experiencing a mix of fear and pleasure. This reflects the tension between repression and desire, especially in the sexually conservative context of Victorian society.

In modern interpretations like Twilight and True Blood, vampires are presented as tortured, romantic figures, blending erotic attraction with themes of control, submission and moral dilemmas around desire. The allure of immortality, eternal youth and moral decay heightens the sexual undertones, where seduction often leads to transformation—another metaphor for sexual initiation.

Zombie narratives, though less overtly erotic, explore sexuality through its absence or degradation. Zombies, depicted as mindless, flesh-eating creatures, devoid of emotion and desire, represent a terrifying inversion of human sexuality. They strip away the complexities of love and intimacy, reducing bodies to mere vessels for consumption. The decaying, grotesque body of the zombie evokes fears of aging, the loss of sexual vitality and physical deterioration—an unsettling contrast to the eternal beauty of vampires.

Both genres explore consent, control and power dynamics in sexual relationships. Vampire stories often hinge on the seductive control of the vampire and the victim’s submission or resistance. The vampire bite, a mix of violation and pleasure, taps into fears of control, coercion and dominance. The predator-prey dynamic can mirror unhealthy or exploitative relationships, offering a way to examine consent and agency.

Zombie films, set in societies on the brink of collapse, reveal ugly aspects of human nature, including themes of rape, exploitation and sexual violence. Stories like The Walking Dead confront survivors with moral dilemmas about relationships and consent in a lawless world, using the breakdown of society to explore primal expressions of sexuality.

Vampires, especially, embody the allure and fear of repressed desires. Victorian literature framed them as symbols of forbidden sexuality in a society that suppressed open discussions of sex. In Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu, the relationship between the female vampire and her victim contains lesbian undertones, reflecting anxieties about non-heteronormative sexuality. In recent works like Anne Rice’s The Vampire Chronicles, vampirism is linked with sexual fluidity and ambiguous gender roles, providing space to explore queer identities and desires.

Both vampires and zombies represent the fear of losing control, particularly sexual control. Vampires symbolize the fear of being overpowered by desire and succumbing to forbidden urges. Zombies, with their lack of intellect and agency, represent a complete loss of control over the body and mind, presenting a terrifying vision of humanity reduced to base, primal instincts.


I will suggest that the recent resurgence of apocalyptic zombie films and brooding vampire antiheroes in popular culture also reflects our modern discomfort with death.

In the past, many found comfort in religious and philosophical beliefs that framed death as part of a greater journey. Today, however, in an increasingly secular world, these traditional frameworks have lost much of their power. Death, once surrounded by ritual, spirituality and philosophical inquiry, is now defined in purely biological terms, leaving many people struggling to find meaning without the spiritual assurances of the past.

In a world where science and technology extend life and promise to stave off aging and disease, death has become more abstract, yet no less terrifying. Instead of accepting death as a natural part of life, we imagine scenarios where the dead rise again—soulless, reanimated bodies that persist without the consciousness that once gave them meaning. These creatures reflect not only our fear of death but our fear of a death that is incomplete—where the body remains, but the self is lost.

In contrast to earlier views that saw death as a necessary process of transformation or reincarnation, today’s secular society often treats death as something to be avoided at all costs. This may explain the enduring appeal of zombies and vampires as cultural symbols. They offer a twisted form of immortality—zombies never die but are soulless and vampires live forever but at the cost of becoming predators. These myths provide no comfort but instead highlight the unsettling thought that death might not be a peaceful release, but rather an eternal torment.

This modern fascination with the undead also reveals the tension between our scientific understanding of death and our deep, primal fear of it. Medicine can prolong life, revive the heart or keep organs functioning on machines, but it cannot conquer death entirely. The depiction of undead beings mirrors our anxiety about living in an age where death is ever-present but seemingly defied by modern technology.

Life support machines can keep bodies alive even after consciousness is gone, and cryogenics promises to preserve the body for future revival. These advances blur the boundaries between life and death in ways that unsettle us, much like the living dead blur the line between humanity and monstrosity.

In earlier times, belief in life after death offered solace—through resurrection, reincarnation or spiritual transformation. But in our secular world, where such beliefs no longer hold as much sway, the concept of “death is not the end” has been reimagined in darker, more troubling ways. Rather than expecting death to lead to a better place, we now fear it might lead nowhere—or worse, to a state of endless hunger, pain and isolation.

As society continues to grapple with these existential questions, the undead in popular culture will likely evolve, reflecting our shifting relationship with death. Without the comfort of spiritual narratives, these creatures embody our deepest fears about what it means to die—and perhaps even worse, what it means to live on after death. They remind us that despite all our scientific progress, the mystery of death remains unresolved and our quest to understand or conquer it is far from over.

Ultimately, the phrase “Death is not the end” has shifted from a promise of life eternal to an unsettling image of soulless bodies seeking blood or flesh. This transformation from spiritual comfort to cultural horror mirrors the broader existential uncertainty of our age, as we wrestle with the reality of death in a world where traditional answers are no longer as persuasive.


While popular culture often portrays the undead—soulless zombies, predatory vampires and grotesque ghouls—these narratives reflect a deeper cultural tension: the loss of traditional frameworks for understanding death and the search for new ways to find meaning in it.

In the past, religious beliefs about the afterlife provided comfort, offering the promise of continuity through eternal life, reincarnation or spiritual transformation. These systems framed death as part of a larger cosmic plan, imbuing it with purpose. Philosophies like Stoicism and Buddhism similarly viewed death as a natural transition, helping individuals come to terms with mortality as part of existence.

However, as secularism has grown, these traditional frameworks have lost their influence. Many now confront death without the spiritual or metaphysical assurances that once softened its blow. Instead, science and medicine define death in biological terms. While necessary for ethical and legal decisions, these definitions provide little existential comfort when facing the finality of death.

The scientific view—death as the cessation of biological function—offers no answer to the deeper human question “What is the purpose of life and how do we face its inevitable end?”

This is where the challenge of finding meaning in death becomes crucial. Without religious or spiritual narratives to guide us, how can secular society find a sense of purpose in death that transcends personal achievements or relationships?

One way is to reframe death not as something to be feared, but as a reminder of life’s finite nature and the importance of our choices. In the absence of promises of an afterlife, secular philosophies encourage us to focus on the legacy we leave, the relationships we nurture and the impact we have on others and the world.

Existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus argued that meaning is not something given but something we must actively create through our actions and commitments. In this view, death is not a looming terror, but a reminder of life’s urgency and the need to live with authenticity and purpose.

Humanism, too, offers a meaningful lens. It emphasizes the value of human life and the importance of compassion and connection. The meaning of death, from a humanist perspective, is found not in what happens after we die, but in how we live in solidarity with others, contributing to the well-being of society and future generations.

In a secular society, embracing mortality becomes central to finding meaning in death. Instead of seeking to transcend death, we can accept its inevitability and focus on the legacy we leave—whether through creative works, scientific discoveries or acts of kindness that ripple through the lives of others.

By considering how our actions impact others and contribute to something larger than ourselves, we can find purpose that extends beyond individual existence. Death becomes a moment of reflection on the broader, intergenerational continuity of human experience. Our personal achievements, while important, are part of a larger web of meaning that connects us to past and future generations.

This perspective allows us to see death not as an isolated event but as part of the cycle of life. Our lives are chapters in a larger story that began long before us and will continue long after we are gone. By embracing this interconnectedness, we can find solace in the idea that our contributions—whether through relationships, creativity or kindness—will resonate long after we are physically present.

In this way, death is not merely an end but a passage that prompts reflection on the significance of our actions in the larger human tapestry. Though our time is finite, the impact of our lives carries forward, offering a sense of purpose that endures beyond our own existence. Death, then, becomes part of the ongoing story of humanity, reminding us that while our individual lives may conclude, our legacies continue to shape the future.


In find it interesting that as secular society grapples with the realities of death, there has been a noticeable resurgence of interest in older forms of storytelling, ritual and tradition. While many no longer adhere to the religious doctrines that once provided meaning and comfort in the face of mortality, there is a growing desire to reconnect with practices that offer continuity, reflection and a sense of closure. Funerals, memorials, wakes and other rituals that honor the dead serve as vital frameworks for processing grief, acknowledging loss and confronting death—even in the absence of spiritual beliefs.

In this context, the challenge of finding meaning in death within a secular culture is not about rejecting tradition, but rather about reinterpreting it in ways that resonate with contemporary values. Whether through celebrating a life well-lived, commemorating an individual’s impact on their community or creating rituals to help us navigate grief, we can derive meaning from death that speaks to both personal and collective experiences. These practices remind us that death, while final in a physical sense, is part of a broader human continuity—one that links generations through memory, legacy and shared human experience.

The phrase “Death is not the end” has evolved from a religious promise into a cultural reflection of our ongoing struggle with mortality. Yet, even in a secular world, the quest for meaning in death remains central to the human condition. It is through the legacies we leave behind, the connections we foster and the ways in which we live purposefully in the face of mortality that we find meaning. In embracing our mortality, we realize that death is not an enemy to be feared, but a mirror reflecting the value and urgency of life itself. In this realization, we may come to see that the true meaning of death lies not in its finality, but in how it pushes us to live fully, love deeply and leave an enduring mark on the world.

Steven Mintz is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin and the author, most recently, of The Learning-Centered University: Making College a More Developmental, Transformational and Equitable Experience.

Next Story

Written By

More from Higher Ed Gamma